Affidavit: Kevin Tierney is a Traitor of the United States of America

Plus, I name forty-seven other Traitors of Connecticut.

FROM THE DESK OF Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, American & Beneficiary in Equity-Executor
DOCKET NO. FST-CV15-6026844-S : SUPERIOR COURT
DOCKET NO. NWH-CV22-6006923-S
DOCKET NO. FST-CV23-5028567-S
DOCKET NO. FST-CV23-5029576-S
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. : J.D. STAMFORD/NORWALK
LD PROPERTIES LLC; LUTHY, THOMAS E.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
S01S-CR22-0169490-T; S01S-CR23-0250191-S;
S01S-CR23-0251706-S; S01S-CR23-0251708-S;
S01S-CR23-0251790-S
V. : AT STAMFORD
PRITCHARD, ANDREW H., ET AL : JULY 24, 2025
PRITCHARD, BRIDGET R., ET AL

Affidavit, a statement of truth:
Kevin Tierney is a traitor.
Kevin Tierney wars against the Constitution for the United States of America and engages in acts of treason.
Kevin Tierney is the “ENEMY” (Title 50 US Code 2204).
Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Ed. Definition: Traitor:
One who, being trusted, betrays; one guilty of treason.
Legal Maxim:
The government is to be subject to the law, for the law makes the government.
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)

Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Liberty: In Meyer v. State of Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923),
“While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed, the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”

Kevin Tierney does not work alone.
Traitors of Connecticut:
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Judge
Sarala V. Nagala

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
Chase Theodora Rogers (RET. 2018)
Richard A. Robinson

Superior Court Judges
Robert L. Genuario
Kevin M. Tierney
Kevin A. Randolph
John F. Blawie
Charles T. Lee
A. William Mottolese
John F. Kavanewsky, Jt.
Ronald E. Kowalski, II
Douglas C. Mintz
David R. Tobin
Kenneth B. Povodator
Walter Michael Spader, Jr.
Bruce P. Hudock
Vikki Cooper
Robert G. Golger
Kevin A. Hernandez
Sheila Ann Ozalis
Taggart D. Adams
Yamini Menon
Thomas Colin
Eric Tindil
William Clark
Gary White
Donna Heller
Margarita Moore
Mary Elizabeth Reid
Peter McShane
Maria Gonzales
Scott M. Jones

Chief Court Administrator, Judge
Patrick L. Carroll, III

Appellate Court Judges
Joseph P. Flynn
Bethany Jean Alvord
Alexandra Davis Dipentima

United States Attorney
David X. Sullivan

Assistant United States Attorney
Julie G. Turbert
United States Marshal
Matt Parker

Connecticut Governor
Ned Lamont
Dannel P. Malloy

Connecticut Attorney General
William Tong

Connecticut Assistant Attorney General
Krislyn Mina Lauer
Deputy Assistant State’s Attorney
Laurence Tamaccio

Norwalk Mayor
Harry Rilling

Norwalk Town Clerk
Richard McQuaid

Norwalk Police Chief
Thomas Kulhawik (Ret.)
James Walsh and other Complicit Participants.

Charges & Claims:
The “ENEMY” (Title 50 US Code 2204) seized by “SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY” (Title 18 US Code 2384), and weaponized the US Judicial Branch from top to bottom executing “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” (Title 18 US Code 2331) upon the “We the People” of America through pirated power affirmed by “ENEMY” Courts. Plus, violation of the Justice for Victims of War Crimes Act & Geneva Conventions.
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: PETITIONS, PUBLIC NOTICE AND JUDICIAL NOTICE ARE UNCONTESTED/UNREBUTTED. (l.) Due to the law of presumption and acquiescence, the Respondents are guilty of Abandonment of their claim of innocence, via, Failure to Prosecute/ Failure to Defend.
Legal Maxim: “A claim not contested, stands true.”
Legal Maxim: “A claim bought in law that is not contested or rebutted, then stands true. Hence silence to a controversy is considered consent to any judgment.”
Legal Maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”
“Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. . . We cannot condone this shocking behavior by the IRS. Our revenue system is based on the good faith of the taxpayer and the taxpayers should be able to expect the same from the 1 government in its enforcement and collection activities.” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299. See also U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032; Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932
The following is unrebutted and uncontested, lawful fact:
FROM THE DESK OF Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, American and Beneficiary in Equity-Executor
JUNE 12, 2024
PUBLIC NOTICE
CGS 54-170 ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT
CONNECTICUT: LOSS OF AUTHORITY FOR ALL JUDGES, STATE REFEREES, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREES, AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS REQUIRING OATH OF OFFICE.
“RACKETEERING”, “ENEMY”, “DOMESTIC TERRORISM”, “BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS”, “GENOCIDE” AND “TREASON” AS DEFINED BY LAW.
THE CONNECTICUT GOVERNMENT IS “AT WAR WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION”
The Constitution is harmed by subverting its authority as the foundational law of the land. A domestic enemy is any American who either promotes foreign invasion or attacks the Bill of Rights. The former assaults national stability. The latter assaults individual freedoms.
1982 Connecticut’s Legislative, Executive and Judicial Branch committed “War against the Constitution” (Treason) as an “Enemy” by eliminating the use of a GRAND JURY made up of the people, an inalienable right.
"THE TROJAN HORSE" was a new creation called an INVESTIGATORY GRAND JURY defined by statute as a judge, constitutional state referee, or three-judge panel appointed “to conduct an investigation into the commission of a crime or crimes” (see CGS § 54-47b).
All Judges, State Referees, and Judge Trial Referees willfully violate the law. There is NO DUE PROCESS in Connecticut Courts. The Complicit Judges willfully use and work with Complicit State Referees and Complicit Judge Trial Referees to put forward a FICTION CASES WITHOUT AUTHORITY.
The Complicit Judges’ Misprision of Felony willfully disregarding that State Referees and Judge Trial Referees violate the requirements of CGS 51-44a [Judicial Selection Commission. Members. Duties. Nomination of judges by Governor] enable “Racketeering” and the “Weaponization” of the Judicial Branch. (see CGS § 52-434 & CGS 51-44a).
This fictional authority exerted by Complicit Judges and other Complicit Participants gives the “ENEMY” absolute power.
For Example: Nemo Judex in Causa Sua ("no one is judge in their own case") an axiom of Common Law and common sense is willfully disregarded by the Complicit Judges and Complicit Participants. Just read the following unconstitutional Connecticut General Statutes empowering the “ENEMY”.
Sec. 51-183d. (Formerly Sec. 51-42). Disqualified judge; proceedings not void. If a judge acts in any legal proceeding in which he is disqualified, the proceeding shall not by reason thereof be void, but such action shall constitute an irregularity of which advantage may be taken by appeal or, where no appeal lies, by proceedings in error.
AND HERE IS WHAT OUR U.S. SUPREME COURT SAYS ABOUT THAT:
30A Am Jur Judgments '' 44, 45. A void judgment is not entitled to the respect accorded a valid adjudication, but may be entirely disregarded, or declared inoperative by any tribunal in which effect is sought to be given to it. It is attended by none of the consequences of a valid adjudication. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place. ... It is not entitled to enforcement ... All proceedings founded on the void judgment are themselves regarded as invalid.
Ableman v. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859) "No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence."

Fifth Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
“Inalienable Rights”
The U.S. Constitution recognized that certain universal rights cannot be taken away by legislation, as they are beyond the control of a government, being naturally given to every individual at birth, and that these rights are retained throughout life.
Supreme Court Case Law:
U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187,
The Supreme Court has warned: "Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance."

End of page 2 of PUBLIC NOTICE