DOJ can hit Obama and his operatives with seditious conspiracy charges for Russia-gate hoax

Julie Kelly drops a nuke: Lays out how the DOJ can hit Obama and his Intel operatives with seditious conspiracy charges for orchestrating the treasonous Russia-gate hoax:

"If you can use seditious conspiracy against those on January 6th, who had no plans to overthrow the government, it's hard to see how the DOJ could not pick that up and use it on the Obama and Biden regime. Should be on the table for the Trump DOJ to consider."

"Attempted to sabotage the president. If Trump lost, Jack Smith would have brought seditious conspiracy charges against him. They were holding that in their back pockets."

Top Obama officials and their corrupt media stenographers repeatedly lied when they claimed the bogus Steele dossier—which was paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC—was never referenced in the body of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment falsely claiming Putin tried to get Trump elected.

A newly declassified top secret review of the ICA concluded that “the dossier was referenced in the main body of the ICA, and further detailed in a two-page ICA annex.”

Obama intel officials then prepared separate versions of the ICA—one for Congress, which did not include references to Steele dossier in the main body, a declassified version for public release which also excluded the dossier even though it was unclassified, and one for Obama and other executive branch officials, which included the Steele dossier references in the main body.

The newly declassified review of the ICA concluded that this sleight of hand was done to allow top intel officials to avoid any public scrutiny or accountability for their inclusion of false, Clinton-funded opposition research in an ICA.

The review also confirmed that Brennan personally “rejected requests from CIA professionals that the dossier be kept out of the ICA.”

“The ICA sourcing errors involving the dossier violated so many ICD 203 directives, that the text would normally not have passed first-line supervisor review at CIA, FBI, or other IC agencies,” the review stated.

“Moreover, the dossier made outlandish claims and was written in an amateurish conspiracy and political propaganda tone that invited skepticism, if not ridicule over its content.”