What do you call a lawyer with a heart and soul? A contradiction.

Judges and Lawyers are the "ENEMY".

What do you get when you cross a lawyer with a demon from hell? Nothing new.

Why did God make snakes just before lawyers? To practice.

What do lawyers do after they die? They lie still.

PAY-UP $34.6 Trillion!

PETITION TO ENFORCE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
AND DECLARE JUDICIAL DEFAULT IN FACT AND LAW

April 21, 2025

Companion Notice to Petitioner’s Four Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Filings.

Dates of the Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Petitions:
September 13, 2024 – RE: Samuel A. Magliari, Jr., [$1,767,881,784]
September 13, 2024 – RE: Andrew Hamilton Pritchard & “We the People of Connecticut”. [$725,781,907,128]
November 13, 2024 – RE: Joseph B. Elad & “We the People of America” [$140,000,000,000]
December 16, 2024 – RE: “We the People of America” and Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. [$33,755,862,000,000]

Restitution Total: $34,623,411,788,912

The “PETITION TO ENFORCE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND DECLARE JUDICIAL DEFAULT” identifies grave procedural breaches and irreparable harm inflicted upon private American individuals. Said document substantiates the constitutional basis for immediate federal intervention and injunctive relief under Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution and 28 U.S.C. § 2243.

PETITIONER: Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, sui juris
Forward:
I, Sui Juris Petitioner, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, declare “Judicial Default” due to the lawfully issued Writs of Habeas Corpus being unanswered. The Supreme Court’s failure to act is judicial abandonment which is default in fact and law.
The Writs of Habeas Corpus petitioned to the Supreme Court of the United States require immediate Remedy and Restitution because of the “Judicial Default”.

I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, demand the charges below be executed by the proper Authority of “We the People”, and demand Restitution (Bill of Complaint) for “We the People” in the amount of $33,755,862,000,000.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH:
The 101st Congress with the signature of President George H. W. Bush made the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 into Law. This was a subtle and significant War on the Constitution. It was the seizure of the Judicial Branch placing it under the control of Congress; thus, seizing total control of the United States Government. Please note: The Supreme Court has not used its well-established power of “Judicial Review” (Marbury v. Madison, 1803) to defend the Constitution from the “ENEMY” seizure. The Supreme Court’s tacit acquiescence affirms its complicit participation in “engaging in war against the Constitution”.

Everything after the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 is VOID, a NULLITY.

Congress and The Supreme Court have no authority to adjudicate, govern, or legislate.
It is unlawful for the “ENEMY” to do so.
*Question: Friend or Foe?

“SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY” & the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990!

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy:

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990:

Bill introduced by Senator Joseph Biden.

Made Law by the 101st Congress and signed by President George H. W. Bush.

Why would one need to do anything to the Oath of Justices and Judges?

What is the purpose of SECTION 404?

Is this “SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY” to control America by the "ENEMY"?

104 STAT. 5124 PUBLIC LAW 101-650—DEC. 1, 1990

SEC. 404. AMENDMENT TO OATH OF JUSTICES AND JUDGES. Section 453 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking out "according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to" and inserting "under".

The Legislative Branch seized control of the Judicial Branch by inserting “under” with no response, rebuttal or resistance from anybody, "TREASON"!

The CONSTITUTION is the “Supreme Law of the Land”, not Congress.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137, 180 (1803)

"... the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument." "In declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank". "All law (rules and practices) which are repugnant to the Constitution are VOID".

Why is the best-known power of The Supreme Court established by the case Marbury v. Madison (1803), “Judicial Review”, not being enforced?

Is The Supreme Court a complicit participant, an “ENEMY”?

1990--Pub. L. 101–650 substituted "under the Constitution"
for "according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution".

This is a subtle Traitor attack which willfully disregards Article VI of the Constitution.