21 cfr 50.22 ~ The FDA has effectively claimed authority over your body, as if it were its property, granting public & private entities the right to conduct clinical investigations on you without your knowledge

Origional Video Post: https://x.com/GodsRiddles/status/1945582471766024387?t=55Vp0_-V0nC5Bs8aMCMlEA&s=19
.
21 cfr 50.22
https://www.google.com/search?q=21+cfr+50.22&oq=21+cfr+50.22&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBggAEEUYOzIGCAAQRRg70gEHNjczajBqNKgCArACAQ&client=ms-android-samsung-ss&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
.
Passed Senate (09/29/2022)
FDA Modernization Act 2.0
"The bill also removes a requirement to use animal studies as part of the process to obtain a license for a biological product that is biosimilar or interchangeable with another biological product" https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/5002
.
Human Augmentation The Dawn Of A New PARADIGM NATO strategic implications project 2021:
"We cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us, we
must be part of the conversation now. The ethical implications are significant but not
insurmountable; early and regular engagement will be essential to remain at the forefront
of this field. Ethical perspectives on human augmentation will change and this could
happen quickly. There may be a moral obligation to augment people, particularly in
cases where it promotes well-being or protects us from novel threats. It could be argued
that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are
examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.
The need to use human augmentation may ultimately be dictated by national interest.
Countries may need to develop and use human augmentation or risk surrendering
influence, prosperity and security to those who will. National regulations dictating the
pace and scope of scientific research reflect societal views, particularly in democracies
that are more sensitive to public opinion. The future of human augmentation should not,
however, be decided by ethicists or public opinion, although both will be important voices;
rather, governments will need to develop a clear policy position that maximises the use of
human augmentation in support of prosperity, safety and security, without undermining
our values.
Governance in Western liberal societies and international institutions is already unable
to keep pace with technological change and adoption of human augmentation will
exacerbate this trend. National and international governance will be challenged by the
myriad of implications of adopting human augmentation technologies. This could lead to
a new arms race and inter- and intra-state tensions if not carefully managed through early
and regular dialogue" https://search.brave.com/search?q=Human+Augmentation+The+Dawn+Of+A+New+PARADIGM+NATO+strategic+implications+project&source=android