Netanyahu Thought He Had The Perfect Gaza Trap—He Really Didn't

Right, so in what is a pretty grotesque twist of irony, Israel the self proclaimed Jewish State, and with Jewish history being what it is, now proclaims itself the architect of the world’s most moral concentration camp. That is seriously the headline in a Haaretz op-ed, though it should be noted it’s a highly critical piece coming from an Israeli newspaper and for good reason. The so-called "humanitarian city" to be constructed in Rafah is presented as an act of mercy, a solution to civilian suffering amid Israel's relentless military campaign. But as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also starkly warned, those who do not enter the camp will be treated as terrorists and killed. Therefore this is not protection; this is coercion. Simultaneously, Israel's unveiling of it’s "Abraham's Shield" regional strategy seeks to enshrine this new status quo, embedding Gaza's permanent containment within a broader system of Arab-backed, tech-fortified apartheid. As these policies unfold, they not only invite growing international backlash but also evoke chilling historical parallels—not least those rooted in Jewish suffering itself as the self declared Jewish state now stands accused of repeating what the world said must never happen again. But the consequences for Netanyahu and Co by going through with this are dire and are already making themselves apparent.
Right, so the blueprint for this "humanitarian city" in Rafah, as announced by Israel’s deranged Defence Minister Israel Katz is neither humanitarian nor a city. As reported by Haaretz and The Washington Post, the plan involves forcibly relocating hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into a sealed-off zone, surrounded by military surveillance and drones, with controlled access to aid and no freedom of movement. The Wall Street Journal has stated that Israel's own military legal corps has expressed deep concerns that this constitutes forced displacement, possibly violating international law. Yet Netanyahu has made his intent unambiguously clear: those who refuse to enter the zone will be classified as terrorists and eliminated.
This amounts to the mass internment of a population based on ethnicity and geography, under the guise of protection. It mirrors the textbook definitions of a concentration camp, especially in its invocation of moral necessity to justify ethnic separation. International humanitarian organisations, including UN agencies, have condemned the plan as morally indefensible. Yet within Israel's political and media landscape, it is lauded as a benevolent act—even described with grotesque irony by Haaretz as the "most moral concentration camp in the world."
The Rafah internment zone is not a standalone anomaly. It is a foundational piece of Israel's broader Abraham's Shield initiative—a regional doctrine announced by Israel's Coalition for Regional Security and detailed in The Cradle, MR Online and The Media Line. The strategy calls for a phased withdrawal from Gaza following a declared "victory" over Hamas, the establishment of a technocratic transitional authority, and security enforcement by a coalition of moderate Arab states.
This vision proposes digital surveillance, biometric tracking, and a cashless economy dubbed "ZeroCash." It frames Gaza not as a future state but as a digitally managed containment zone—a prison in everything but name. Education, governance, and media would be "de-Hamasified" under international oversight, effectively erasing Palestinian political agency in exchange for a monitored humanitarian existence, though even the notion of being permitted to exist under Israeli control with everything we’ve witnessed over the last 21 months is hard to swallow. Throw in a concentration camp and its impossible.
What is unfolding in Rafah and beyond cannot be divorced from the historical memories, especially amongst the worlds Jewish communities, both inside and outside Israel—because the obvious comparisons that get made, the mental images that spring to mind when talk of concentration camps emerge, is that of Jewish ghettos and concentration camps in Nazi-occupied Europe. While no one claims Israel is constructing gas chambers here, the structural logic of forced internment based on ethnicity, the deprivation of freedom, and the threat of extermination for noncompliance evoke haunting comparisons nonetheless. The Warsaw Ghetto, initially framed as a containment zone for "security reasons," became a holding pen for mass death.
Jewish scholars and Holocaust survivors, including Amira Hass, Gideon Levy, and the late Hajo Meyer, have warned for years that Israeli policies toward Palestinians echo the very forms of oppression Jews once suffered. The idea that a state founded in response to genocide is now practicing ethnic internment is not simply ironic—it is a historical inversion of the gravest and most depraved kind.
Israel’s self-image as the "most moral army in the world" is rapidly imploding under the weight of its actions. The propaganda apparatus that justifies bombing refugee camps as "precision strikes" and internment as "protection" is losing credibility even among traditional allies. As exposed by AP News and others, Israel's international reputation is eroding as human rights groups, legal experts, and even military officials within Israel express alarm.
Haaretz's bitter irony—that this is the most moral concentration camp ever built—underscores the absurdity. It is not the morality of the plan that is on trial, but the morality of those who accept it. The invocation of Holocaust memory to justify such policies has not only failed to shield Israel from criticism but has invited deeper scrutiny.
Far from securing Israel's future, the Rafah plan and Abraham's Shield are accelerating its diplomatic isolation. The plan presumes the cooperation of Arab regimes in surveilling and pacifying Gaza, a big billboard popping up with the faces of all manner of Arab leaders, calling itself the Abraham Alliance, yet there is no clarity about which of the leaders pictured have signed on to this and it has naturally ignited backlash among Arab populations, deepening the legitimacy crisis of those very governments. The Palestinian population, meanwhile, is increasingly radicalised, with the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics reporting a 10% drop in Gaza's population since the start of the war—a stat that Quds News Network have run with—a consequence of death, displacement, disappearance and forced exile, it very much casts new and horrifying light on how many people cannot be accounted for, upwards of 200,000 people, with the official death toll only a little more than 25% of that figure.
Western allies are also being forced to reckon with the moral implications. The ICC and ICJ are under pressure to expedite their investigations into Israel for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The United States, is now facing domestic opposition to its unconditional support for Netanyahu's government. European governments, too, are struggling to reconcile their human rights rhetoric with their political inaction.
Though framed as a post-war recovery strategy, Abraham's Shield is not a path to peace. It is a doctrine of permanent containment. The replacement of Gaza’s political institutions with technocratic, surveilled, cashless structures ensures that no meaningful sovereignty can emerge. The plan echoes the logic of apartheid-era bantustans—islands of managed, dependent populations, denied political rights but governed in the name of stability.
This is not reconstruction. It is digital occupation. Gaza becomes a proving ground, a laboratory, for "post-sovereignty governance"—a system where biometric IDs, aid-dependency, and foreign policing replace politics, resistance, and national self-determination and becomes the normal way of life for a captive population, though clearly, given what Israel are doing at aid hubs, having 600,000 Palestinians locked up and unable to run away, you fear for what the actual course of events will be.
The more Netanyahu pushes forward with these plans, the more he strengthens the legal cases building against him around the world. Prosecutors at the International Criminal Court (ICC) have already signalled intent to investigate forced displacement and targeting of civilians. The unveiling of a formalized internment regime, described openly by Israeli officials and documented across media, gives these prosecutors new evidence of intent, systematicity, and state-level planning—key criteria under the Rome Statute for crimes against humanity.
Furthermore, national courts operating under universal jurisdiction—including those in Spain and South Africa—are increasingly emboldened to pursue arrest warrants and travel bans. Netanyahu’s rhetoric—that Gazans must enter the camp or be killed—is now being cited in petitions to reopen cases that had previously stalled. As this plan unfolds in real time, it serves not as a shield, but as a confession.
Countries previously hesitant to intervene legally now face public and parliamentary pressure to act. Legal NGOs and Palestinian advocacy groups are coordinating dossiers, testimonies, and satellite data to deliver airtight legal claims. The image of Gaza as a digitized, AI-managed concentration camp is now not just a moral outrage—it is a prosecutable crime in waiting.
Israel’s actions today carry the weight not only of political consequence but of historical betrayal. The very tactics now used to intern Palestinians—sealed zones, surveillance regimes, forced displacement under military occupation—were once used against Jews in Europe. The state that was born in the aftermath of genocide, forged in the image of 'never again,' is now deploying the very technologies and doctrines of division that once oppressed its founders. But this is where Zionism leads to.
By instrumentalising Holocaust trauma to justify the dispossession of another people, Israel is forfeiting its moral legacy entirely. In attempting to prevent what is according to them another Jewish catastrophe, the Israeli state is actually manufacturing a Palestinian one.
The longer this inversion persists, the greater the reputational, legal, and existential costs. Already, generations of Jews around the world are disavowing Israeli policies. Civil society movements like BDS are gaining global traction. Institutions from universities to labour unions are severing ties. The memory of the Holocaust—intended to uphold a standard of universal dignity—is being weaponised to deny it.
If Israel continues down this path, it risks becoming what it always feared: a pariah state, isolated by its own hubris, sustained only through militarism and external patronage. Its future would no longer be one of democratic flourishing, but of fortress governance, cultural siege, and permanent crisis. Decline cloaked in defiance.
Israel's actions in Gaza mark the collapse of its post-Holocaust moral narrative. No longer can it claim to be a light unto nations while building walls around entire populations. No longer can it invoke the trauma of Jewish suffering while replicating many of those very same mechanisms against another people.
This is not merely a crisis of policy but a crisis of meaning. If Jewish survival is to be tied to Palestinian erasure, then the ethical foundations of Zionism are undone and for as many people are already at that point, this should serve to drive a great many more in that direction. How can any kind of concentration camp be acceptable to anyone of Jewish descent? As the world watches as Rafah is prepared to be transformed into a concentration camp, the question is no longer whether the analogy is appropriate—but why it took so long for the world to admit it.
Israel’s wall in Gaza was built to keep Palestinians in. But in the reflection of that wall, the world now sees something else: the image of a state willing to become what it once abhorred and I use the past tense intentionally, because it can’t possibly claim that any more if they push ahead with this. The Rafah concentration camp is not a moral necessity; it is a moral catastrophe. Abraham's Shield is not a strategy for peace; it is a blueprint for digitally managed apartheid and Israel must not be allowed to get away with this, because there’s no excusing the optics and there will be no excusing those who continue to support Israel if they get away with this.
Arguably this will drive more and more people to boycott, divest and sanction. BDS you see has had a rather successful couple of weeks, which have seen a litany of major corporations and organisations split from Israel wholesale, but to really hurt Israel we could do with many more. Check out the details of that story in this video recommendation here as your suggested next watch, to get a bit of a lift after this story and find out about all of that.
Please do also hit like, share and subscribe if you haven’t done so already so as to ensure you don’t miss out on all new daily content as well as spreading the word and helping to support the channel at the same time which is very much appreciated, holding power to account for ordinary working class people and I will hopefully catch you on the next vid. Cheers folks.