Inside the Raw Milk Trials: Consent, Courts, & the Fight for Freedom | EP 7

In this powerful episode of Foundations in Reality, George shares how he’s structured his private raw milk business to stay outside of government jurisdiction. He explains the legal distinctions between the public and competent private individuals, recounts his two trials and convictions, and unpacks how “significant societal consensus” is undermining true justice. George challenges the courts’ application of statutory law over natural law and argues why real freedom means choosing to take risks—without asking for permission. If you value liberty, this episode is essential listening.

What You Will Learn
1. The difference between public vs. private jurisdiction and how George applies it.
2. Why informed consent paperwork is central to George’s business model.
3. The legal precedent of significant societal consensus—and why it’s problematic.
4. How natural law and fundamental justice diverge from statutory enforcement.

Episode Highlights: raw milk regulation, informed consent, public vs. private domain, natural law, statutory law, justice of the peace, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, legal competency, Milk Act violation, court appeals, LaBéa case, group sex club ruling, societal consensus, human rights in Canada, food freedom, jurisdictional overreach

______________________

Want to learn more? Check my telegram channel with more short videos, legal maxims and daily insights.

Telegram | https://t.me/foundationsinreality

______________________

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this episode are personal opinions and are intended for educational and informational purposes only. They are not legal advice. Listeners are encouraged to do their own research, question everything, and consult appropriate professionals when making decisions related to law, rights, or governance.