Fertility Suppression By 'Elites': Our Society Has Been Targeted For Destruction - What Peterson & Carlson Refuse to See

What Peterson, Carlson and Walsh REFUSE to see.

Everything you need to know to have a successful life has been undermined.

Our society has been targeted for destruction. Why?

Fertility suppression by hostile elites is a real thing. And its a brutal one.

The Great Replacement as a Crime (VI. Lemkin and Genocide)
https://millennialwoes.substack.com/p/tgr-lemkin

In each country, this is how its been done:

the national pattern has been dissolved with multiculturalism, egalitarianism and nihilism, and the “hollowing out” of tradition via rank consumerism

the desire to preserve/restore the pattern has been demonised as illiberal, racist, fearful, irrational, immoral, and at any rate antithetical to multiculturalism and therefore impossible and outrageous

the idea that the country ever had a national pattern has been undermined (“Britain has always been multicultural!”)

the idea that the country’s main ethnic group exists (and could therefore have a pattern) has been undermined (“Britain is a nation of immigrants!”)

the very existence of the White race has been undermined (“we all came from Africa!”)
----------

Two centuries ago, Russia had a smaller population than France.
Low white birth rates are OUR doing. It should be a discussion among US, NEVER with the anti-Whites.
THEY are trying to turn our low birth rate into GENOCIDE.

If Whites are forced into a breeding contest in their own homelands to survive you’re admitting that genocidal policies are in place.

Canadian population would be increasing even without any immigration because Canada has one of the highest birth rates among industrialized countries". Even with the current birth rate, he adds, "our population .... would continue to grow until 2026 and then decline almost imperceptibly until it stabilized at 18 million eight centuries in the future. As for the prospect of Canada arriving at a stable population in the distant future, that is not cause for alarm. Many European countries already have stable populations, and Europe remains prosperous. An absence of population growth results in increased productivity, less unemployment, and reduced pressure on both urban and rural environments". Stabilizing population patterns are a natural result of the high standard of living and health the Canadian population enjoys. Pursuing immigration only serves to distort the demographic distribution in Canada and disrupt social harmony.
Why then does the government pursue high levels of immigration to accelerate population growth? Canada's high standard of living is based on the high per capita income Canadians generate from an industrial workforce combined with investment in capital intensive technology. This results in higher productivity per capita and a high standard of living. This wealth will not be enhanced by population growth. Canada's GDP is comparable to China's GDP: the problem for China is their population of 1.2 billion people. Responsible population growth is being compromised by the Canadian government's drive to increase Canada's population.
Particularly disturbing are the comments of Kingsley Davis on population control. Specifically, he pointed out in 1967 that if governments choose to reduce population growth without giving the appearance of specifically doing so, the most effective means to achieve it would be to: "Squeeze consumers through taxation and inflation; make housing very scarce by limiting construction; force wives and mothers to work outside the home to offset the inadequacy of male wages....; encourage migration to the city by paying low wages in the country and providing few rural jobs; increase congestion in cities by starving the transit system; increase personal insecurity by encouraging conditions that produce unemployment". The implication between such a prediction and the current situation is obvious--has the government limited population growth in Canada to better 'justify' or make room for further immigration? Why then has the Canadian Government deliberately implemented a large scale multi-racial immigration program despite the continuous objections of Canadians for over 20 years?

------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.