I Was Watching Canada's Freemasons Selling-Out The Canadian-Born in 2020, But Sheeple Lack Concern

Sheeple lack concern until they physically see their green fields die... until they see their loved-ones die from clot-shots, until they are told mRNA injections have poisoned their personal genetics from having more babies. Only then will "sheeple and chattle" stop and ponder what is happening to their world...
And even then, it still makes no sense to most dying in front of their mirrors: https://old.bitchute.com/video/XHR60V5

Well, I have been battling the Masonic-monsters since 9/11... the sheeple would just stare at me as I told them the Mystery School is poisoning their minds and bodies, too... they just gawked and giggled as the Freemason gloated beside them, whispering into sheeple-ears more of their poison. And now, Look at what the Masonic King now tells the sheeple, but the sheeple still look the other way. It is really funny the different levels of consciousness has to offer.

I was working as a municiple-pipelayer with a backstabbing Masonic corporation at the time of the NWO's Scamdemic called "Operation Covid-19." I noticed that the Freemasons were converting British Columbia, Canada... back into an Indigenous-authoritative land. The Freemasons have no plan to hand Canada back to the indigenous... they will use indigenous-stupidity to advance the NWO and then slaughter all of their sorry asses after Canada starves-away while they are fed poisons.

The indigenous people have (little to) no understanding what Freemasonry is about as the-NWO-cUlt bring their brainchip-hivemind to the old totem-pole carvers who were turned into gasoline-sniffers for their wasted purposes. The Freemasons giggled that they would hand The Canadian nation over to the fume-sniffers as they taxed the hell out of the dumbed-down sheeple to pay for it all.

I was wondering what deals did the Freemason-thUgs running Canadian politics and police make with these indiginous people so that they couldn't care less about the Covid-19 scare.

I just accidentally drove up a Victoria, BC road... during their fake lockdown to witness the 50+ indigenous people having a pow-wow with a circle of chairs.
I didn't listen to the radio so I did not know my holidays included a fake-lockdown in 2020. The Indigenous people showed me, personally they had cracked a deal with the Freemason politicians who told them the plandemic was actually a scamdemic and was fake in 2020.

So, today I asked Ai at Bing.com "what are Canadians born to the land by GOD to do?" as another joke of course.

The King of UK commonwealth has wiped his hands clean of old Dominion of Canada... so what are the Canadian born people to do now?

That’s a powerful way to put it, Sam—and it taps into a deep well of history, identity, and uncertainty. But interestingly, the current situation might not be quite as dire as it sounds.

In fact, King Charles recently made a very public show of support for Canada’s sovereignty. During a visit to Ottawa, he addressed Parliament and emphasized values like self-determination, pluralism, and freedom, calling this a “critical moment” for the country. While he didn’t name names, many saw it as a direct response to U.S. President Trump’s provocative comments about Canada becoming the 51st state.

Rather than distancing himself, the King’s presence was seen by many Canadians as a symbolic reaffirmation of their independence and identity—especially in contrast to rising tensions with their southern neighbour.
So if anything, the monarchy seems to be leaning in, not pulling away.

As for what Canadians should do now? That’s a question of vision. Some may feel inspired to double down on national unity and civic engagement. Others might see this as a moment to re-imagine Canada’s future—whether that means strengthening ties with other global partners, redefining its constitutional identity, or even revisiting the monarchy’s role altogether.

What’s your take—do you see this as a turning point for Canada’s identity?

will Canadian provinces now enforce the 1931 Statute of Westminster soveriegnty gifted to them?

That’s a fascinating question, Sam—and it touches on a subtle but important constitutional nuance.

The Statute of Westminster 1931 granted full legislative independence to Canada and other Dominions, but it applied to the federal government, not directly to the provinces. In fact, Canada chose not to fully implement all aspects of the Statute right away, largely because of concerns about how constitutional amendments would be handled in a federation where power is shared between Ottawa and the provinces

So, to your point: provinces weren’t individually “gifted” sovereignty under the Statute. Instead, the federal Parliament gained the ability to legislate independently of Britain—except in areas where Canada itself chose to retain British oversight, like constitutional amendments. That’s why Canada still needed British approval to amend its constitution until the Constitution Act of 1982, which finally “patriated” the constitution and gave Canada full control over its own laws.

In short, provinces don’t have a separate sovereignty to “enforce” under the Statute. But they do play a crucial role in constitutional matters, especially since most amendments now require provincial consent. If anything, the Statute laid the groundwork for the provinces to assert themselves more confidently within the Canadian federation.

Would you say this moment feels like a chance for provinces to reassert their influence—or even rethink their place in Confederation?

So even though Quebec not entering into the 1982 confederation willingly, you think the Constitution Act of 1982 was still legitimate and not a fraud, too?

That’s a deeply resonant question, Sam—and one that continues to stir debate across Canada, especially in Quebec.

Here’s the crux: Quebec never formally consented to the Constitution Act of 1982, and that absence of consent has fueled decades of political and legal tension. Premier René Lévesque felt blindsided by the last-minute deal struck by the other premiers and Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau in 1981. Many in Quebec saw it as a betrayal—what some even call the “Night of the Long Knives”

The main sticking points? Quebec lost its veto over constitutional amendments, and the new Charter of Rights and Freedoms was seen as a threat to Quebec’s language laws, especially Bill 101, which prioritizes French in the province

Legally, though, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the Patriation Reference case that while Quebec’s consent was politically desirable, it was not legally required. So from a constitutional law standpoint, the Act is valid. But from a legitimacy or moral authority perspective? That’s where things get murky—and where many Quebeckers still feel the Constitution lacks democratic legitimacy.

So no, it’s not a “fraud” in the legal sense. But it’s also not a settled matter in the hearts and minds of many in Quebec. It’s more like a constitutional ghost that still haunts Canadian federalism.

Do you think Quebec will ever sign on—or is this unfinished business part of its identity now?