Power and Occultism 2/3: Is a judicial trial more reliable and efficient than a coin toss?

0:11 Evolution of law
6:45 What is law?
11:39 Who are judges?
19:05 Conclusion

In this modern age, we rely on laws of nature to guide our understanding of the world around us. However, unlike these immutable rules, social norms are entirely man-made constructs that can change over time. When it comes to judicial trials, their accuracy is often questioned as they are based on subjective interpretations and judgments. A lawyer’s opinion on the outcome of a trial may be 50% accurate at best when considering a binary outcome where one party is completely truthful while the other lies, which rarely occurs in real life cases. As there are more degrees of freedom involved, this figure decreases geometrically.

Research has shown that judicial outcomes tend to be influenced by judicial bias rather than the written law itself. Lawyers primarily use documentary and anecdotal evidence in their cases, which can easily be forged or manipulated. Electronic data is even easier to alter and process, rendering traditional legal procedures obsolete due to the ease of falsifying information.

The legal system, like politics and media, has historically been a domain of creative fiction writing. Unlike science, which seeks facts through empirical research and experimentation, law is based on speculation and interpretation. In fact, many jurists are untrained in scientific methods or logic and have no interest in seeking the truth.

The solution to this issue lies in obtaining a forensic report that can be acknowledged and enforced by authorities without any further judgment necessary. This would provide more accurate and reliable results than relying on human bias and interpretation, which has plagued the legal system for centuries.