The Agenda 21 Wizard. The man who taught me most of what I know. 12/16/2014

Quite a few of you asked to see the old videos. I heard a lot of comments about how you wanted to go back and look at old Agenda 21 videos. If it is your desire to really learn about this subject then these are the videos you should be spending the most time on.

In California, it is state law that all cities must have a general plan. Once a plan is passed, the bare minimum requirement has been fulfilled. There is no enforcement when it comes to implementation or updates to the plan. When a city decides to update its plan, it's doing so because it wants too, not because anyone from the state is telling them too. To give an example, as of 2019, the city of Norco was operating on a 50+ year old plan. Anyone who has been through that area can tell the town still has an old west feel to it. That's because there has been no attempt to update or modernize the town.

In West Covina where i use to live, city council members who were elected in 2013 ran on a platform of updating the city general plan.

At a city council meeting in 2014, Rangwala Associates was awarded the contract to conduct the city's visioning and planning process. The contract awarded the firm around $500,000. The question I asked over time is why even have a city planning department if we're just going to outsource the work to someone else at a major cost to taxpayers? The answer to that question is plausible deniability. If things go wrong, the city can blame the planning firm instead of looking inward.

After going through this exact process in other cities I came to learn that the average cost for these urban planning firms is around $1,000,000-$1,500,000 which means the city of West Covina got a heavy discount with Rangwala Associates. I have no idea why (RA) was willing to do the work for such a price. I make that statement because when I looked into Kaizer Rangwala, I discovered that he is world renowned in his profession. He has won over a dozen awards for the work that he has done. In other words, he is an expert in his field.

Kaizer Rangwala definitely has left/progressive leanings and considering he was in my town implementing Agenda 21, I can say he radicalized me even further. What I will also say is that there is no one that I learned more from when it comes to what Agenda 21 actually is and how it is carried out. Kaizer knows exactly what he is doing, he knows what he is involved in, and he is an expert at manipulating a room to go along with the preconceived vision otherwise known as the Delphi technique.

I recorded Kaizer about a dozen times over the course of 6 months. I think I have anywhere from 16-18 hours of footage of him. Some of you are going to say you're getting sick of him. I think some of you did back when it was fresh. How do you think I felt back then? After a while, I couldn't wait for the process to just be over with so I didn't have to battle with this guy anymore.

Over the next few months on the Rumble channel, there is going to be a lot of videos featuring Kaizer. If you really want to learn about this stuff, this is who you learn it from. Kaizer Rangwala is the Agenda 21 wizard.

Note: I just remembered this. In the video, when I finally got to question him, his response was "SCAG says the city is growing..." Looking back, I can't believe I even got him to say the word SCAG out loud. At the time, I had never even heard of SCAG so it went right over my head. I can say the same about everyone else in the room. None of us knew what he was talking about.

I didn't at the time, but I now know who almost every single person in the room is. Pretty much everyone in the room is on the city council (3 total), a city employee, or a city insider who has no actual title within the city but is part of the clique that hangs around all the city functions. By having a majority of the city council in the room, the meeting is a sanctioned Brown Act meeting which means it's suppose to follow Brown Act rules which means everyone in the room should have been allowed 5 minutes for public comment. 5 minutes because that was the rule the city had in place at the time. The meeting was a violation of the Brown Act since those rules weren't followed. I should also note that this meeting was held right before Christmas because that's how this stuff is always done. Either early in the morning on a weekday or right around a major holiday. Anything to keep attendance as low as possible.