3 months ago

Until the 1960's, Canada was homogeneous enough, overwhelmingly white, European, Anglophone, and Christian. This provided sufficient commonalty
that people all regarded themselves as Canadians.

Diversity™ is the cause of the dissolution of Canadian society into a Potemkin village of pseudo tolerance, envy and coercion, parasitism and faux ethics.

In Canada, this was done with a bait and switch, sold as multiculturalism between European groups, that was changed to to multiracialism, and the accommodation of divergent racial, religious and cultural groups, that have no common genetic heritage.

What was ‘our’ strength before diversity?? What will it be AFTER diversity?? There
will be an ‘after’, because there always is an after for such coercive, evil measures. It is not possible
for millions of non-white non-Canadians to live among a European based Canada without
transforming it into non-White not-Canada. And that is why it is very much in the interest of non-
whites and non-Canadians to support the return of Canada’s population to the pre-1965 ethnic
demographics that were promised to Canadians from Mackenzie King onwards.

There will be visible consequences: for economic productivity, reciprocity in personal life, lower
educational standards and cultural involvement, declining social responsibility, crime and cynicism in
public and private interactions, corruption and state coercion, racial conflict on a daily scale–
unmentioned but very draining, ugliness in daily life. You believe you can coerce and control
everything through state force indefinitely without consequence. You can’t: the failures, poverty,
ugliness, and collapse of communism demonstrated that. People won’t tell you about this, many don’t
want to admit to it (after all, they will be harassed, bullied and potentially lose their job and coveted
social status — the Potemkin benefits of ‘equality’, ‘diversity’ and state sanctioned ENVY), but it is
real. Truth doesn’t go away because you censor it, ignore it, tax it, and coerce it out of consciousness.
Is it really plausible that the leaders of dozens of White nations have adopted similar policies
antithetical to the long-term survival of their own peoples, yet none of them knew what they are doing?

--------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.

Loading comments...