Why the Supreme Court Rejected Trans Activist Logic

In December, I broke down the oral arguments in Tennessee v. Skrmetti and warned this wasn’t the case activists thought it was. Now the Supreme Court has ruled — and it wasn’t even close.

In a 6–3 decision, SCOTUS upheld Tennessee’s ban on medical transition procedures for minors. But the ruling wasn’t about feelings or identity. It was about law, precedent, and definition.

Activists failed to define transgenderism as an immutable characteristic, failed to prove sex-based discrimination, and failed to realize how courts think. The result? A legal precedent — not a knockout blow, but a massive shift in the battle ahead.

This is what happens when you live in an echo chamber and ignore the legal terrain. Let’s talk about what the ruling really means, why it matters, and what comes next.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/court-upholds-tennessees-ban-on-certain-medical-treatments-for-transgender-minors/

https://youtu.be/m-nARXaIyAw

➡️ What’s your take on the SCOTUS decision? Let me know in the comments.
👍 Like • 💬 Comment • 🔔 Subscribe to help the channel grow.