Why Feminism Happened ft. So-Called Signs of a Misogynistic Man — Daily Persuasion Ep. 159

Would you like to write a persuasive BOOK? One that changes minds and influencers behavior for years to come? Start with a GOLDEN book idea. Let NEW YORK TIMES bestselling author Joshua Lisec teach you: https://lisecghostwriting.com/golden

ABOUT TODAY'S EPISODE:

What if the root cause of modern feminism wasn’t oppression—but addiction?

In Episode 159 of Daily Persuasion, Joshua Lisec takes you on a provocative journey into why feminism happened—and no, it’s not the story you were taught in school. Titled “Why Feminism Happened ft. So-Called Signs of a Misogynistic Man,” this episode peels back cultural myths and exposes a long-ignored truth: alcoholism explained feminism more than ideology ever did.

Lisec, a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and trained hypnotist, is known for digging beneath the surface. In this episode, he challenges both leftist slogans and right-wing memes, unpacking so-called signs of a misogynistic man with a level of nuance rarely seen in today’s culture wars. Through persuasion psychology and historical insight, he uncovers why the suffrage movement and temperance movement surged at the same moment in history—and why women who had long resisted the vote suddenly demanded equality under the law.

Why feminism? The answer, Lisec argues, begins not with politics but with pain. When women were trapped in homes with alcoholic husbands who beat them, cheated on them, or withheld finances and freedom, the family unit—once functioning for the majority—suddenly broke. These weren’t rare anecdotes. They were tipping points. And that’s why we saw feminism rise alongside the call for prohibition. This is alcoholism explained not as personal vice, but as civilizational catalyst.

Lisec doesn’t stop there. He draws from historical persuasion examples, showing how women once argued against suffrage, believing they were too virtuous for politics. That belief system shifted only when male behavior made the existing arrangement intolerable. If you’ve ever wondered why we need feminism, Lisec’s analysis offers a searing—and uncomfortably honest—answer. And he offers persuasive techniques to talk about this sensitive topic without losing the room.

You’ll hear why so-called signs of a misogynistic man—jealousy, control, financial manipulation, neglect—weren’t invented by third-wave feminists or TikTok influencers. These behaviors were documented and decried over a century ago, triggering a massive cultural and legal transformation. This isn’t sarcasm or satire. It’s truth-telling, and Daily Persuasion is where it lives.

In signature Lisec fashion, this episode weaves persuasion techniques, techniques of persuasion in writing, and examples of persuasion in advertising into the fabric of his argument. He explains how to persuade someone to do something as radical as rethinking their stance on why feminism happened, without alienating them. The lesson? Speak directly, but empathetically. Start with what people already believe. Then, guide them to a new conclusion.

And while many online voices today reduce the issue to Signs of a Misogynistic Man, Lisec warns against these so-called signs being used without context. He shows how persuasion psychology is often weaponized in ways that do more harm than good—and why we must go deeper to find solutions that actually work.

This isn’t a feminist manifesto. It’s not an anti-feminist rant, either. It’s Joshua Lisec, applying logic, history, and the tools of influence to a cultural debate that refuses to go away. He shows how alcoholism, more than ideology, created the conditions for the suffrage movement, and how men failing to police men led to laws stepping in.

If you want to understand why feminism happened, beyond the slogans, memes, and Twitter threads, this episode is your guide. If you want to use persuasion to change minds and not just win arguments, this is essential listening.

Because the truth is this: You can’t talk about why we need feminism—or not—without talking about what went so wrong in the first place.