The Vaccine Safety Scandal: Why the NIH Refuses to Compare Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Populations

The Vaccine Safety Scandal: Why the NIH Refuses to Compare Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Populations

Del Bigtree @TheHigh_Wire, a fierce advocate for medical freedom, recently shared a chilling revelation from his work with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. During Donald Trump’s first term, Kennedy was tasked with confronting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) about vaccine safety. Bigtree accompanied him, armed with critical questions.

What they uncovered was staggering: the NIH admitted they do not conduct double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—the gold standard for safety testing—for childhood vaccines. Why? They claim it’s “unethical” to withhold vaccines from a placebo group.

When pressed further, Bigtree and Kennedy asked for a retrospective study comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations using the NIH’s vast database of millions. The response? “We can’t figure out how to do that study.” This excuse baffled Bigtree, as comparative studies are the backbone of science. How could the NIH, with all its resources, claim such a study is impossible?

A year later, at an event with pro-vaccine advocate Paul Offit, Bigtree got clarity. Offit dismissed the idea of a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study, citing “confounding factors.” The unvaccinated, Offit argued, are likely healthier not because they avoid vaccines, but because they live differently—avoiding tap water, processed foods, or even airport scanners. In other words, the NIH has likely conducted these studies, but the results don’t fit their narrative: unvaccinated individuals are consistently healthier, with lower rates of autism, cancer, and other chronic conditions.

This realization exposed a disturbing truth: the medical establishment prioritizes the sick over the healthy. Instead of studying why unvaccinated populations thrive, they dismiss them as outliers and double down on vaccinating everyone—regardless of the consequences. Bigtree passionately argues this approach poisons healthy individuals, destroys gut biomes, and undermines natural immunity, all to prop up a system that profits from perpetual illness.

“They’re attacking the healthy to protect the sick,” Bigtree declared. “My kids are thriving without your injections, and I’ll fight to my last breath to keep your poisons away from them.” This is a call to action: demand transparency, reject coerced medical interventions, and protect our children’s health.