Canada Cuts 'Hamas' from Hostage Statement—Why?

📝 DESCRIPTION
Canada Cuts 'Hamas' from Hostage Statement—Why? It’s the question we must all ask when the truth is quietly edited out of history.

On June 10, the Carney government released a joint international statement calling for a Gaza ceasefire, aid delivery, and the release of hostages. But unlike the UK—whose version explicitly named Hamas as the terrorist group holding those hostages—Canada’s official version deleted the word “Hamas” entirely. Gone was the clear demand for Hamas to release civilians. Gone was moral clarity.

Instead, we’re left with vague calls for peace, reconstruction, and political pathways. No names. No accountability. Just bureaucratic ambiguity. This isn't an oversight—it's a deliberate editorial choice.

This moment reveals a deeper issue in Canada’s political soul: the refusal to confront evil directly when doing so might offend political allies, certain voting blocs, or media narratives. But let’s be clear: appeasement isn’t diplomacy. It’s abdication. And you don’t build peace by rewriting reality.

Civilians are still underground. Hostages remain in tunnels. And Ottawa—rather than showing backbone—chose silence. What kind of message does that send to victims of terror? To allies who still name evil plainly? Or to Canadians who expect truth from their leaders?

If we can’t even say who took the hostages, how can we claim to stand for human rights?
And when did moral clarity become politically inconvenient?

🔗 Read the Canadian version of the statement here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2025/06/joint-statement-by-the-foreign-ministers-of-australia-canada-new-zealand-norway-and-the-united-kingdom-on-measures-targeting-itamar-ben-gvir-and-be.html

🔗 Compare it to the UK’s version here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-partners-unite-to-sanction-ministers-inciting-west-bank-violence

🔍 KEYWORD
#canadapolitics2025 #hamasstatement #foreignpolicy #truthmatters