Horne: "Seminal Article in AMERICAN THINKER Confronts the MSM Failure to Cover LUNA Hearing on May 20, 2025" https://insidethearrb.livejournal.com/27206.html https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/06/the_media_s_failure_to_effectively_confront_recent_jfk_assassination_testimony.html Galbraith: https://www.defenddemocracy.press/on-the-consequences-of-the-kennedy-coverup/

This was a tremendous interview. I cut it into ten clips and this is the first.

Earlier rear entry: https://rumble.com/v6uesbn-horne-shot-1-from-dal-tex-to-lower-rear-of-skull.html The question which this answers is why the rear exit would be on the right side and not the left, if the shot came from the right/grassy knoll. The question this doesn't answer, unless I missed something, is how the exit debris hit the motorcycles on the left if the shot exited through the right. The first thing to take in mind is the Z film is altered and may or may not be accurate of which way JFK's head tilted. If accurate, JFK's head was tilted AWAY from knoll as the bullet hit, which makes even less sense of the debris hitting Hargis on the left, with the exit wound pointed at a steeper angle toward the knoll. (Fiester says that shot would have to come from far side of steet/the South Knoll: rumble.com/user/johncleer?q=fiester) This suggests the Z Film is not real OR that the skull debris came not from the huge exit wound but the upward shot that landed high above the right eye, as seen in stare of death Parkland photo: https://rumble.com/v6v1tuz-dark-legacy-nyt-reports-on-112263-drs-perry-and-clark-saw-right-side-front-.html https://rumble.com/v6uesm7-doug-horne-on-the-likely-shot-from-storm-drain-2-or-3-to-high-right-forehea.html https://rumble.com/v6uesz9-pre-existing-fbi-report-disputes-wc-on-limo-location-storm-drain-best-expla.html So it's hard to imagine a clean answer for the debris exiting the right wide of the skull then hitting the DPD on the left.

Marince Corps Sgt Roger Boyajian https://rumble.com/v6qt99k-doug-horne-on-the-three-versions-of-the-jfk-autopsy-report-.html?playlist_id=VhO4twhF3cQ

https://rumble.com/v6lce9j-doug-horne-on-the-jfk-three-head-shot-scenario-w-which-drs.-chesser-and-man.html?playlist_id=VhO4twhF3cQ https://rumble.com/v6qt99k-doug-horne-on-the-three-versions-of-the-jfk-autopsy-report-.html?playlist_id=VhO4twhF3cQ

The investigation to follow, this summer, on the reported dead SS in Parkland, & on the purple shroud etc, very interesting look into what Horne is finishing up (the docu) and what he's working on immediately after.

Both Hearings (the next one will go up here too): https://rumble.com/playlists/MWVg2WNQAW8

#Doug Horne 1 #Dr Mantik

#Doug Horne 2 #JFK Assassination

Not making one for the shot to the temple, I think everyone understands that: https://rumble.com/v6ldk2y-luna-to-bring-in-parkland-docs-hard-proof-of-fake-autopsy-pics-right-temple.html https://rumble.com/v6lce9j-doug-horne-on-the-jfk-three-head-shot-scenario-w-which-drs.-chesser-and-man.html

#doug horne #jfk storm drain

Excerpts from Director's Cut of Doug Horne's A TRAIL OF DECEIPT: THE JFK SKULL X-RAYS, 1963 & 1979: https://rumble.com/playlists/BdHtAtpsjX4

Playing the Cliff Carter tape; debunking JOAN MELLEN's fingerprint study beyond any reasonable doubt- it's evident from her argument that she is a paid shill; reviewing Roger Randolph Carr's testimony from across the street at the courthouse. Did he see LBJ's long-time hitman Mac Wallace? Jones broke the news 5mo.s ago on the long-rumored Clifton Carter tape re: Mac Wallace: https://rumble.com/v69ihqa-breaking-audio-surfaces-lbj-bagman-saying-lbj-hired-mac-wallace-to-kill-jfk.html https://rumble.com/v6drwkd-joe-hoft-on-new-aj-audio-of-lbj-bagman-roger-stone-called-lbj-mac-wallace-j.html https://rumble.com/v6edor7-stone-1-28-mac-wallace-took-the-shots-from-tx-book-depository-6f-unloads-on.html Definitive article taking down Mellen's fingerprint dispute, according to Nelson: https://lbjthemasterofdeceit.com/2021/03/24/read-nexus-redux-professor-david-dentons-excellent-essay-critique-of-joan-mellens-shameless-book/ Nelson's appendix: https://lbjthemasterofdeceit.com/2021/10/07/reframing-history-with-more-myths-mellens-faustian-bargains-wrong-on-many-levels/ Full 30m Groubert interview: https://rumble.com/v51y26l-phillip-f-nelson-on-lbjs-alleged-involvement-in-jfks-death.html The hippie discussing CARR and context at the end is STEVE HAGER, who's 1991 High Times article implicating HOOVER and DULLES Jim Garrison called, "the best magazine article ever written on the subject": https://archive.hightimes.com/article/1991/09/01/heritage-of-stone https://preterhuman.net/docs/Heritage_of_Stone,_by_Steven_Hager Hager on Carr (narrated from): https://stevenhager.net/2016/12/12/richard-randolph-carr-is-a-clue-to-the-jfk-assassination/

The Paulina Luna segment in the preview pic does mention anything about JFK but it seems like they might've cut the second half of the interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=328gFv86oVs Kevin Hofeling Timestamps: (00:05-00:36) Oliver Stone and James DiEugenio appeared before a House Committee to discuss reopening the investigation into JFK's assassination, highlighting missing information and the lack of awareness among younger committee members. (00:36-01:24) Stone testified that government agencies, particularly the CIA, have not cooperated with the JFK Records Act, noting that the Secret Service shredded their records related to the case. (01:24-02:13) DiEugenio and Stone created a documentary called "JFK Revisited" containing significant information from the Assassination Records Review Board. They reject the theory that Oswald acted alone. (02:13-04:00) DiEugenio emphasized that evidence of a large gaping wound on the right side of Kennedy's head (seen by 42 witnesses at both Parkland Hospital and Bethesda Medical Center) contradicts the official narrative and suggests a second shooter. (04:00-05:10) Stone discussed eyewitness testimony from three women on the 4th floor that makes Oswald's alleged movements physically impossible, arguing these facts have been ignored despite their significance. (05:10-06:30) DiEugenio cited forensic expert Dr. Henry Lee, who stated that trajectory analysis on Kennedy's wounds is impossible because neither wound was properly dissected during the autopsy. (06:30-06:50) Both speakers emphasized the lack of chain of custody for critical evidence, including the bullets, rifle, and Kennedy's brain, making it impossible to reach valid conclusions in a legal sense. (07:11-08:14) The interview concludes with Stone discussing his experience directing Val Kilmer (who had recently died at age 65) in "The Doors" (1991), praising Kilmer's dedication and expressing regret that he wasn't nominated for an Academy Award.

From the show notes: The Luna Committee has been extended for another six months. Perhaps they will hold open hearings in the future? Jim encourages Len to have MLK author and researcher John Avery Emison back on Black Op Radio. John Avery Emison recently published "The Deep State Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr." Find here. Are the RFK and MLK charges of conspiracy as easily provable as with the JFK case? The impact to our social structure when RFK and MLK were murdered is the same as with impact of JFK's murder. The Tet Offensive against the South Vietnamese in 1968 was from January 30 - March 20. Read more. Ted Shackley was a CIA in Vietnam. Dean Acheson walked out on LBJ after LBJ after LBJ continued to preach war. Acheson wanted real data. Secretary of Defense Clark Clifford spent 2 weeks at the Pentagon. It was clear there was no plan to win the war. Johnson abdicates on the air after it was obvious he had lost public support to McCarthy.

#JFK Assassination Hearing #Mexico City #Dan Hardway ARRB

#Dan Hardway #JFK Assassination

Nails it almost with this CIA cunt Roe. She's there to promote her book, and they're letting her do it, but obviously that can not be the end goal of them bringing her. She's there to shill and they want to build her record so she can shill more, and they want someone young. Groubert is wrong that Curtis is "just a dentist." Schnapf points on the Ed Forum "Dr. Curtis is not simply a dentist. he was a oral & maxillofacial surgeon. This often involved reconstruction of jaws. I interviewed Dr. Curtis back in 2018 several times when he appeared at a CAPA conference. He had asled that i not write about his comments until he had a chance to speak to authorities. now 7 years later, I am no longer embargoed. I will be doing a piece that will go into more detail than his testimony yesterday. He was somewhat frail yesterday which is not unexpected considering his age but he was sharp as a tack in 2018." I've noticed Groubert take many positions that could be seen as shilling. Like LBJ as the final boss. I think he's right about Hardway but what do I know. The way he defends the Z Film and Groden is not evidence based. His position on the Three Tramps which Groden would not join him. He unnecessarily discredits Curtis in this one and covers for Rowley. Of course there's something in it for Rowley, he's in on it. But Groubert wants the entire hearing to be pointed at LBJ. Inaccurately discredits the most important witness and promotes the boring guy Tunheim. But maybe that's just how he sees it. #Mark Groubert