Kevin McKernan: Hidden DNA Contamination in the Pfizer Shot, A Massive, Ignored Oncongeic Threat

This presentation was recently given to Commissioners of Phase 2 of New Zealand’s Royal Commission of Inquiry into COVID-19 Lessons Learned.

Summary

• The Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials! Bait and switch fraud!

• Significant DNA contamination has been found in 10/11 studies.

• Significant DNA contamination is now found in 5 peer reviewed studies looking at people's blood and tissue.

• Cancer is on the rise.

Quotes from the presentation:

“If you look through the vaccine history and the literature, you'll know that the SV40 virus contaminated the polio vaccines, and there's a large debate in the literature that's been going on for decades as to its implication in cancer. When you give SV40 viruses to cell lines and to tissues you will get cancers, there's no question about that.....in the laboratory, this virus is one of the most potent oncogenic viruses we know of. We don't have the whole virus in these vaccines, we have some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus in the vaccines however, and I'm going to touch on some of the papers that point that out. These sequences are very functional and they have consequences when they are left behind inside of a vaccine.”

“The DNA sequence that's in there is known as the SV40 promoter in the enhancer region, that's one of the regions, there's also an SV40 origin of replication that we'll touch on, and there's an SV40 polyA signal. Those are the three main pieces of DNA that are in there. The SV40 enhancers are used in gene therapy plasmids, these are nuclear targeting sequences, so these transcription factors bind to that sequence and drag it, and everything connected to it, into the nucleus of the cell. So when you hear a lot of the responses to this work, they’ll say, ‘Oh, it doesn’t matter, it’s never going to get to the nucleus.’ There are two things wrong with that statement: firstly, there’s a nuclear targeting sequence that guarantees it will get to the nucleus, secondly, these lipid nanoparticles go to cells that are dividing, and when cells divide, there is no nuclear envelope protecting the DNA. They have to go through cell division, and that dissolves during that process. So when they’re talking about this not getting to the nucleus, these people are doing a smoke screen on you. They’re not being honest about the fact that cells divide, and when cells divide, there is no protection of this DNA. That’s something to watch out for when you see people saying it doesn’t get to the nucleus, that's a sign they are trying to lie to you.”

“The other literature out there shows that this SV40 promoter and enhancer binds to the p53 gene. The p53 gene is the guardian of your genome, it's a tumour suppressor gene. You don’t want anything binding to that gene, otherwise you may see an impact in cancer. This is very important given the literature we have now on the spike protein itself also inhibiting the expression of the p53 gene. Now we've got two reasons to be concerned about p53: the DNA in there interferes with it to some degree, and we know the spike protein plays a role in that pathway as well, so there's an oncogenic concern here. There is also listed literature now demonstrating that this particular sequence is known as a ‘hyper mutability element,’ it will induce mutations in DNA near it, potentially leading to tumourigenic activity. So when they say there is no function to this DNA, you can point to these three papers and say, no, there’s published function of this DNA that needs to be explained. This is not something you can dismiss by saying, well, they forgot to tell us about it. No, it’s very relevant, and there’s a reason they forgot to tell you about it: they didn’t want you to know this was in there. And you'll see that this lines up with some of their future business interests.”

“The kicker here is that we’re now finding these sequences not just in the vaccine, but we're finding them in people. We don’t know if it’s integrated, but it’s there. These are studies that weren’t looking for it, and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. There's at least five peer reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing in vaccinated and unvaccinated people. If you dig through that data on NCBI, you can take all those reads, map them against the plasmids from the vaccine manufacturers, and you can find that DNA in these patients. There's a study from Ryan et al. that looked at 75 people in Australia, and there's a great study from Chakraborty that went though that data and demonstrated that both the Ryan paper and the Odak paper have Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in the patients’ blood. So this means that the blood supply is contaminated. That’s a very serious issue if the blood banks aren’t looking for it and are re-injecting this into other people. This would normally have caused an enormous halt in any other scenario, once you find components of the vaccine that were never declared and have links to oncogenic sequences, and they are now floating around the blood supply, and no one’s doing anything about it. That should be a concern to everybody in the transfusion field.”