The ISED Canada Retaliation Files: The Fight for Truth – Part 8: The Discrimination Timeline

In this episode, we examine the timeline of escalating departmental conduct toward Prime Rogue Inc., specifically following our Notice of Intent to Sue served on Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) on May 1, 2025.

We highlight how contact with Acting Director of ATIP Anik Meredith began only after that legal notice — and how, following that point, the department’s posture grew increasingly coercive, dismissive, and structurally discriminatory. While we do not assert causality outright, we raise serious questions about the correlation between protected legal activity and the chilling departmental tactics that followed.

We walk through the facts, including the withdrawal or modification of 72% contested requests, inaccessible clarification formats, and the 6.1(1) application itself — asking whether this sequence reflects institutional neutrality, or retaliation masked as administration.

This is not just about access. It’s about equity, reprisal, and the right to seek justice without fear of procedural punishment.