Netanyahu's SHOCKING TV Attack Backfires Hilariously!

Right, so yesterday I put out a video titled is this Benjamin Netanyahu’s most insane speech to date? And frankly I should have held on another day, because last night he put out a televised attack so deranged and bereft of any semblance of reality in an attack on the leaders of Britain, France and Canada, three nations that have bent over backwards for Israel and frankly still are, because they have dared to demand humanitarian aid get into Gaza and an end to Israel’s atrocities there. Netanyahu won’t countenance any comments along the lines of Israel ceasing its genocide in Gaza, by Netanyahu’s own words the ethnic cleansing of Gaza according to the Trump plan must be the condition upon with the genocide ends, but to hammer his point home, he has now labelled Mark Carney, Emmanuel Macron and Keir Starmer as Hamas supporters given what they have asked. He is incredulous that sanctions have been threatened against Israel and has compared the phrase Free Palestine to being equivalent to a Hitler-style salute having once more referred to Hamas as neo-Nazis.
Netanyahu’s speech is so unhinged, he doesn’t even realise that everything he accused others of in his insanity, can be pointed to and evidenced as having been done by Israeli forces and people are freely pointing this out, so its backfired hilariously on him, couldn’t happen to a more deserving person.
Right, so that was a clip of Benjamin Netanyahu’s televised raving at the leaders of Britain, France and Canada, who has he placed on the side of Hamas there, the full clip is available on social media he went on for over 7 minutes, pleading victimhood, crying why us? All the usual garbage that he comes out with as Israel under his direction continue unabated with their genocide in Gaza.
Now we live in an era increasingly defined by misinformation and political gaslighting, I’d like to think as a result of that we’re more able to spot it, especially the more blatant examples of that and certainly I think Benjamin Netanyahu’s televised attack on the leaders of Britain, France, and Canada stands as one of the more blatant and grotesque examples of that, of political deflection. Just because I’m British – I prefer Cornish, but I am British – I have no skin in the game of defending Keir Starmer, I lambast him pretty much daily on this channel for many, many reasons, his pro Israel positioning one leading reason for that, but equally that goes to show how ridiculous Netanyahu’s position is and why I’ve no fear of being seen as pro Starmer for calling out Netanyahu here, because the pair of them disgust me in truth.
In his interview, in that clip you just watched, Netanyahu lambasted these Western leaders, implying that their criticisms of Israel's military campaign in Gaza were tantamount to support for Hamas. Being anti-genocide is to be pro Hamas, and I say that fully aware of Starmer still to this day refusing to use that word, so he’s not even that really. Far from reinforcing his narrative, Netanyahu’s tirade has shone the light back on the scale of atrocities committed by Israel in Gaza, the growing consensus among international leaders for accountability, and the dangerous, genocidal rhetoric emanating not just from Israel’s far-right but also from international allies.
Netanyahu’s ludicrous comparisons set the tone for his latest piece of propaganda. In that interview, he likened the phrase "Free Palestine" to a Nazi salute, branding it equivalent to "Heil Hitler". He repeatedly compared Hamas to neo-Nazis, suggesting that anyone opposing Israel’s military actions was siding with genocidal terrorists.
Its an historically incoherent analogy. It forces people to view what is happening not in terms of legitimate political critiques and disgust at genocide being carried out before our very eyes on a daily basis across social media, but forces us to look at it through the narrow viewpoint he demands that we do, a sickening moral binary that has no legitimacy. Israel has occupied Gaza since 1967. Netanyahu can make it all about Hamas, but they didn’t exist before 1987. Occupied people, as ordinary Palestinians in Gaza are, have a right to resist occupation. It is not the same as the purge of Jewish people and all other minorities the Nazis picked on as well, quite contrary to that, Netanyahu is saying the genocide will only stop if Gaza is ethnically cleansed of Palestinians, so I’m sorry, but who are accusing of aping the Nazis again? I’ve avoided making that comparison previously, but it can’t be ignored in the context Netanyahu himself has used here surely?
The comparison reduces legitimate humanitarian concerns about the slaughter of civilians in Gaza to Nazi sympathy and that is a dangerously and deeply offensive oversimplification that trivialises both the Holocaust and the suffering in Gaza and Netanyahu should be rightfully condemned by everyone for that, by Jew and non Jew alike for that.
Netanyahu went further to claim that calls for a Palestinian state by Britain, France, and Canada are "rewarding murderers" and accused Palestinians of seeking to annihilate the Jewish people. This charge, portraying Palestinians as an existential threat to Jews who have lived in the Middle East for 3,500 years, according to Netanyahu, ignores not only the actual 77-year history of the Israeli state, self-proclaimed Jewish state but also the deep historical presence of Muslims, Christians, and Jews in the region for millennia. His statements suggest a deliberate conflation of the modern Israeli state with ancient Jewish history, manipulating historical narratives to justify modern-day colonialism and military aggression. Three world religions trace their roots to the area, Zionism doesn’t get to take precedence.
In a particularly egregious display of historical revisionism, that particularly revulsed me, Netanyahu asserted that Gaza was a de facto Palestinian state and had done nothing but attack Israel. This claim whitewashes the reality of the Israeli occupation since 1967, the Nakba which began in 1948 with the creation of the Israeli state and continues to this day. Gaza, alongside the West Bank, has been subjected to a brutal and illegal Israeli occupation for 58 years. The blockade of Gaza, often described as an open-air prison, has crippled the region’s economy for almost two decades, destroyed its infrastructure, and denied its people basic human rights. To call Gaza a "state" is not only disingenuous—it is an insult to those who have suffered under the yoke of siege and occupation and an insult to people fighting to see Palestine reunification, Gaza and the West Bank one state together.
Netanyahu's comments also ignored a crucial point: the ongoing refusal of Israel to allow an independent investigation into the events of October 7. Reports and witness testimonies, not least from the former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant have stated that Israel activated the Hannibal Directive—the IDF policy that prioritises shooting Israeli citizens to stop them from being taken hostage. It’s very easy for Netanyahu to sit there and keep comparing that night to the Holocaust, but what was Israel’s role? Because if it was all Hamas, why won’t you allow an independent investigation? Instead of welcoming scrutiny, Israel has blocked foreign journalists, and numerous journalists have been killed in Gaza, making independent verification near-impossible of that event and all the atrocities across 19 months that have meted out in Gaza by Israel since.
More damningly, Netanyahu’s criticisms of international leaders came just as a wave of genocidal rhetoric from Israeli and allied political figures reached fever pitch. It goes beyond just Netanyahu now, lets widen this a bit. Israeli newspaper Haaretz has just published a poll conducted by Penn State University that has revealed that 82% of Jewish Israelis support the expulsion of Gaza’s entire population. 47% of respondents agreed that the Israeli army should act like the biblical Israelites under Joshua in Jericho—killing all inhabitants of a conquered city. The poll also found that more than 65% of respondents believe in a modern-day incarnation of Amalek, that biblical enemy that gets thrown at Palestinians, and 93% of those believe the command to “erase Amalek” still applies today. Now I have opined before that I don’t believe every Israeli thinks like Netanyahu does, that this is still just one poll and the questions asked, how they were phrased was not published, so there is some caveat here, but then equally Israel kept electing a madman like Benjamin Netanyahu, majority rules and all of that, so it does imply that Israel society has some massive problems here.
If these statistics truly are representative of a mainstream opinion that has been emboldened by political and religious leaders, then I fear for how Israel can possibly cease to be a disruptive force in the Middle East no matter who leads them.
Others have made just as shockingly depraved comments as Netanyahu has made this crackpot speech.
Deputy Knesset Speaker Nissim Vaturi has often made horrendously callous comments, but he may have surpassed himself now, as he has called for mass executions in Gaza. An excerpt from Quds News Network reads:
‘Israeli Deputy Knesset Speaker Nissim Vaturi has openly called for mass executions in Gaza, intensifying fears over Israel’s ongoing genocide against Palestinians.
Vaturi, a member of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Likud party, said, “We must separate the women and children and kill the adults in Gaza. We are being too considerate.”
He added, “Who is innocent in Gaza? Civilians came out and slaughtered people in cold blood.”
Vaturi also described Palestinians as “scumbags and subhumans,” and claimed, “Nobody in the world wants Gaza’s civilians. They are all pushing them toward Israel.”
The lawmaker went further, threatening the West Bank city of Jenin, saying, “We’ll soon turn Jenin into Gaza.” He called for its destruction, stating, “Don’t bother searching for terrorists. If one is in a house, bring the house down. Tell the women and children to leave.”’
These sentiments, far from being condemned as they should be by all that hear them, are echoed and sometimes amplified by lawmakers elsewhere in the world
Republican Congressman Randy Fine in the United States suggested that Gaza be nuked, drawing a direct parallel with Hiroshima. His comments followed that shooting at the Israeli embassy and declared that Gaza—home to over 2 million people—should therefore pay the price. 1 million Palestinians for each Israeli is that it, Randy?
In this climate, Netanyahu’s portrayal of himself and Israel as victims becomes even more grotesque. France, the UK, and Canada have not called for Hamas to remain in power; rather, they have expressed concern about Israel’s tactics in Gaza, which have resulted in the deaths of over 54,000 Palestinians, according to the recent official estimates. To frame such calls for a ceasefire as tantamount to supporting terrorism is not only disingenuous—it is downright dangerous. It paints targets on people’s backs and if the US incident is not a false flag as much conspiracy theory currently surmises – not completely beyond the realms of possibility, Israel have done it before, then rhetoric like Netanyahu’s and Vituri’s is more likely to be at fault. Moreover, Britain criminalises support for Hamas, with violations carrying a 14-year sentence and the Terrorism Act get abused constantly to press charges against anyone seen to be pro Hamas, which for the record and to cover myself, in no way is this video attempting to do. The case of Dylan Evans, a writer and activist standing trial for allegedly supporting that proscribed organisation, exemplifies how severely the UK punishes even perceived associations with Hamas.
If you haven’t heard about this case, well, independent media has got your back, here’s an excerpt from Skwawkbox:
‘The trial of writer and anti-genocide activist Dylan Evans for supporting Palestine and opposing Israel’s genocide and occupation begins tomorrow, after a year of bail, under the Terrorism Act for allegedly ‘supporting Hamas’ over comments on social media supporting the Palestinians’ right – a right that is clear under international law – to oppose illegal occupation.
Evans was accused in 2023 by the notorious ‘Gnasher Jew’ group of pro-Israel activists, who claimed that he had made antisemitic comments on Twitter/X. The Gnasher Jew group has been described as “extreme pro-Israel hawks” using accusations of antisemitism out of “a single-minded concern to protect a hard line stance on Palestine”.’
To claim that these governments are supporting Hamas is, therefore, a blatant lie.
France has also forcefully responded to these accusations. Israeli minister Gideon Saar's suggestion that Britain, France, and Canada are inciting hatred against Israel drew a sharp response. France dismissed these claims outright, pointing to the real source of incitement: the Israeli government's own policies and the unrestrained hate speech of its officials.
In reality, Netanyahu’s public relations campaign is falling apart under the weight of its own contradictions. The more he speaks, the more apparent it becomes that his narrative is not about peace, security, or Jewish survival—it is about domination, expansion, and ethnic cleansing. His language, and that of his allies, lays bare a vision of a Greater Israel devoid of Palestinians, enforced through military might and justified by religious mythology.
The international community must match words with deeds now, because he isn’t listening and never will until made to. Netanyahu’s attacks on world leaders are not merely political spats—they are part of a broader strategy to delegitimise any opposition to his genocidal campaign in Gaza. His rhetoric mirrors that of the worst historical oppressors, cloaked in the language of self-defence and national security.
If there is any silver lining, it is that Netanyahu’s hyperbolic accusations have spotlighted the disinformation and moral bankruptcy at the heart of Israel’s war narrative once again. Most of the world horrified by what uis happening in Gaza already thinks he’s a madman and they’re not being convinced otherwise. They have also highlighted the need for robust international mechanisms to hold war criminals like Netanyahu accountable, no matter how powerful or well-connected or protected they may be.
It is no longer enough to merely call for a ceasefire. The international community must demand an end to the occupation, the lifting of the blockade on Gaza, and a credible pathway to Palestinian statehood now and Israel has no right to any involvement in that. Netanyahu has made his intentions clear, precisely why Israel can play no part.
Netanyahu's speech was not a demonstration of strength, but a glaring admission of guilt. His words, intended to intimidate and delegitimise, are reflected completely back on him and have instead exposed the moral rot at the core of Israel’s war on Gaza. He’s a war criminal wanted on an international arrest warrant for a reason and he’s demonstrated why that is all over again here.
For more on Netanyahu’s previous speech, which set out his position to ethnically cleanse Gaza as the only course of action that will see the end of the genocide, his non-negotiable red line as that now is, get all the details of that story in this video recommendation here as your suggested next watch.
Please do also hit like, share and subscribe if you haven’t done so already so as to ensure you don’t miss out on all new daily content as well as spreading the word and helping to support the channel at the same time which is very much appreciated, holding power to account for ordinary working class people and I will hopefully catch you on the next vid. Cheers folks