4 months ago

In addition to all the witnesses and autopsy photos showing a back wound, there was no back-of-the-neck wound at all.
https://rumble.com/v6qfpmc-single-bullshit-theory-is-doa-bc-all-witnesses-and-autopsy-photos-show-back.html?playlist_id=Z22Oc1FMfss
https://rumble.com/playlists/Z22Oc1FMfss
Segment from What The Doctors Saw, with 3 clips woven in to explain the James Tague shot which is the reason they had to invent that ridiculous theory.
They invented the Magic Bullet because a Dallas News Report got out about James Tague being wounded by a fragment of cement that was shot in the gournd next to him on the other side of Elm St.
FBI maintained previous theory of 3 separate rear shots, (despite audio of Hoover acknowledging the Connally shot came from front), by pretending the Tague shot never happened, after first ignoring the reports, then filling in the bullet hole on the curb and finally taking the piece of curb to a lab to examine, where they found there was no bullet hole (because they filled it in).
So that's why the Warren Commission says there was a magic bullet, there was some pressure from the public to acknowledge the James Tague shot. They did not find it tenable to deny the bullet that wounded Tague, while Hoover's FBI did not find the Magic Bullet tenable.
Keven Hofeling summarizes the "What the Doctors Saw" clip:
THE FATAL FLAW IN THE MAGIC BULLET THEORY -- THERE WAS NO WOUND IN THE BACK OF JFK'S NECK:

The back wound was too low on JFK's back for the "magic bullet theory" to work. The best evidence of that fact is JFK's Death Certificate, executed by White House Physician George Burkley (who was present in Trauma Room One at Parkland Hospital, and at the Bethesda autopsy) on November 23, 1963, the day after the assassination. The Death Certificate states:

“A second wound occurred in the posterior back at about the level of the third thoracic vertebra.”

The Warren Commission was well aware of this, and consequently omitted the Death Certificate from the 26 volumes of the Warren Report. Can you imagine that? Including Oswald's pubic hairs in the Warren Report, but omitting the President's actual Death Certificate?
Secondly, autopsy pathologist J. Thornton Boswell's autopsy face sheet diagram shows the wound five to six inches below the neck. That face sheet, by the way, was marked "verified."
Among the other evidence that the back wound was "at about the level of the third thoracic vertebra" is the following compiled by Dr. Gary Aguilar:
----------------------------------------------------
"...The autopsy photographs and a fractured right transverse process of the first thoracic process, “T-1,” support the current, official view, that JFK was hit 3- to 4-cm to the right side of the middle of the 7th cervical vertebra. or perhaps the 1st thoracic vertebra. That would place it at the very top of the back, close to the midline. But even so simple a fact as that isn’t beyond dispute. On the night of the autopsy Boswell prepared a diagram of the backside of JFK, marking a bullet’s entrance well below either “C-7” or “T-1.” Though the Warren Commission did not print it, an identical version of Boswell’s diagram turned up which was signed as “verified” by the President’s personal physician, George Burkley,[337] who gave his own evidence for a lower wound. In the official death certificate, which Burkeley wrote on 11-23-64, the day before he saw and verified the low wound depicted on Boswell's face sheet, Burkeley wrote that, “A second wound occurred in the posterior back at about the level of the third thoracic vertebra.”[338] A good match for Boswell’s sketch. Other credible witnesses corroborated a lower wound:

· Secret Service agent Glenn Bennett was riding the follow up car. He was the first to document, in contemporaneous notes, Kennedy taking the back shot. He wrote, "I looked at the back of the President. I heard another firecracker noise and saw that shot hit the President about four inches down from the right shoulder."[339] The Warren Commission accorded his observations “substantial weight,” writing, "Although [Bennett’s] formal statement was dated November 23, 1963, his notes indicate that he recorded what he saw and heard at 5:30 p.m., November 22, 1963, on the airplane en route back to Washington, prior to the autopsy, when it was not yet known that the President had been hit in the back.”[340]

· Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who climbed aboard the President's limousine after the shooting, described the back wound to Representative Boggs under oath, "I saw an opening in the back, about 6 inches below the neckline to the right-hand side of the spinal column."[341]

· John Ebersole, the morgue described the back wound in a recorded telephone conversation with David Mantik, MD, PhD in 1992, as, "to the right of T-4", the fourth thoracic vertebra - one vertebral space lower than Burkley's death certificate placed it.

· The FBI agents who witnessed the autopsy described the wound in a formal report dictated on 11/26/63, saying, “Dr. Humes located an opening which appeared to be a bullet hole which was below the shoulders and two inches to the right of the middle line of the spinal column."[342] Moreover, after a 1977 interview with one of the FBI agents, Francis O’Neill, the HSCA interviewers reported, "O'Neill mentioned that he does not see how the bullets that entered below the shoulder in the back 'could have come out of the throat." In addition, O'Neill hand-sketched a 'profile' drawing of the 'back-throat' wound showing the back wound considerably lower than the throat wound.[343] The other FBI witness, James Sibert, also drew a sketch of JFK’s ‘back-throat’ wound for the HSCA in which the entrance site on the back is considerably lower than the throat wound.[344]..."

https://history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/How5Investigations/How5InvestigationsGotItWrong_6.htm
____________
Excerpt from Paramount + "What the Doctors Saw" (2023)

Official Trailer: https://youtu.be/MM-rqHroIDs?si=xkUPLR9O2v_D9MSb

Loading comments...