Police are Tax Collectors

The police are a foreign military occupier to the Imperial Crown of the Australia Commonwealth 1900 UK,  The Saint Edwards Roman Catholic Crown they have on there uniforms in 1957 Queen Elizabeth 11 stated she cannot implement laws nor seek justice on the people of the true Commonwealth of Australia so how does this company with a registered ABN 63 446 481 493 since the 1st off November 1999 implement false laws against we the people learn the facts the police are committing war crimes as they are only employees to a business as Shane Patton is the CEO  for Victoria policy officers.

PLENTY v. DILLON.
Trespass—Access to premises for service of summons—Whether common law right to enter—Statute permitting service of summons personally or by leaving at usual place of abode or business—Whether implied power to enter—Damages—Justices Act 1921-1975 (S.A.), s. 27.

~ Penhallow v Doane’s Administrators (1795) ~
“Governments are corporation ‘inasmuch’ as every Government is an artificial PERSON an abstraction & a creature of the mind only
A Government can interface only with other artificial PERSONS
The imaginary – having neither actuality nor substance – is foreclosed from creating & attaining parity with the tangible
The legal manifestation of this is that no Government as well as any law agency, aspect, COURT etc therefore can concern itself with anything other than corporate artificial persons & the contracts between them”

~ Cruden v Neale 2 NC 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70 ~
“There every man is independent of all laws except those prescribed by nature
He is not bound by any institution formed by his fellow men without his consent”

~ Regina v Banner (1970) VR 240 at pg 249 – the Full Bench of the Northern Territory Supreme COURT ~
“(POLICE officers) have no power whatever to arrest or detain a citizen for the purpose of questioning him or of facilitating their investigations
It matters not at all whether the questioning or the investigation is for the purpose of enabling them to ascertain whether he is the PERSON guilty of a crime known to have been committed or is for the purpose of enabling them to discover whether a crime has or has not been committed
If the POLICE do so act in purported exercise of such a power, their conduct is not only destructive of civil liberties but it is unlawful”

~ Magistrate Duncan Reynolds ruled (21June 2013) "there is no common law power vested in POLICE giving them the unfettered right to stop or detain any PERSON and seek identification details…
Random stops are in fact not lawful

”Magistrate Duncan Reynold’s ruling is consistent with DPP vs Hamilton (2011) in that: “An ancient principle of the common law that a natural PERSON not under arrest has no obligation to stop for POLICE or answer their questions and there is no statute that removes that”
“The conferring of such a power on a POLICE officer would be a substantial detraction from the fundamental freedoms and or political liberties which have been guaranteed to the citizen by the common law for centuries”

~ Justice Stephen Kaye in DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS vs ANDREW HAMILTON.; December 25, 2011. Victorian Supreme COURT (s272 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009, Supreme COURT of Melbourne, Common Law Division - Judicial Review and Appeals List No. SCI 2011 2011 on the 25 Nov 2011; Supreme Court Justice June 2011
Consequently, there is no STATUTE AUTHORITY requiring or obligating a private natural PERSON to stop and be randomly questioned by any POLICE officer unless being detained by Warrant of Arrest and neither is a NATURAL PERSON obligated or required to comply with any given direction

The High Court of Australia to declare legislation unconstitutional and therefore invalid.

For all codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws.

“For all codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..” - (Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); ".

Police v Australian Govt First they had to destroy the reality and people's Minds to create an unstable reality and society to create a profitable gain. Rothschilds armies. 1999 dun and brad street (GST) from John Howard and the illegal ATO. . A description and history of government [ Bank ] policy enforcers . Police Officer (pronounced policy officer) is a private security agent of a private company granted the authority by a particular government elite to alienate certain public and constitutional rights for profit and the privatization of “public peace” and protection duties at the expense of historic peace officers such as sheriffs and constables. . The origin of Police Officers . The concept of private militia companies being granted the authority to act as an occupation army against the general populace is an unprecedented and alien concept first invented in the mid-19th Century in England upon the bankruptcy of the Empire by the Rothschild dynasty. . Prior to this time and in many countries, constitutions and parliaments provided for a network of public servants called Peace Officers to serve the best interests of the public, work with Justices of the Peace and protect the public from corruption or harm. The office of Sheriff is one last example of one role that was instituted in many countries. The office of Constable in English colonies is another example of a public servant and peace officer. . However, following the upheaval of debt and control of the British Empire shifting to the banks, through the Metropolitan Police Act 1839, Metropolitan Police Courts Act 1839, a new system was introduced that “enclorsed” the rights of the public to peace officers, replaced with policy enforcement officers (pronounced police officers) solely responsible to protect the interests of the elite and to generate revenue from the populace through fines, threats and penalties.

Today, most modern police forces find themselves in a permanent conflict with private shareholders demanding protection of the elite, organized crime duties and revenue raising, versus genuine concern for public safety and keeping the peace. . To avoid the breakdown of large scale police forces into warring factions, most police forces now separate certain duties to ensure front line agents are not exposed to the most extreme duties of private employees to the corporation, while maintaining the illusion that the privatization of public safety and protection is producing better results. . In some major cities where the private policy (police) companies seek greater control over the public, the police agents have been caught enacting and participating in riots, particularly in Europe. . Despite overwhelming evidence that private policy (police) militia are unconstitutional, have protected and promoted a system of entrenched organized crime and made many cities less safe, almost no private policy force has been disbanded in any major city to return to traditional law enforcement peace officers. . Australian Police are only Corporate Officers – UCC – Uniform Commercial Code. . Impersonating a commonwealth officer is a crime punishable of up to 2 years in jail.. yet every public (corporate) servant does it. . Australian-police-are-corporations-not-public-servants/ . STATE VIC POLICE ABN 63 446 481 493 STATE WA POLICE ABN 91 724 684 688 STATE SA POLICE ABN 93 799 021 552 STATE NSW POLICE ABN 43 408 613 180

STATE TAS POLICE ABN 19 173 586 474 STATE QLD POLICE ABN 29 409 225 509 . SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA (BUSINESS UNIT 19)(ABN: 32 790 228 959) STATE OF VICTORIA(ABN: 32 790 228 959) COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA(ABN: 32 790 228 959) JUDICIAL COLLEGE OF VICTORIA(ABN: 32 790 228 959) LIQUOR LICENSING VICTORIA(ABN: 32 790 228 959) ASSET CONFISCATION OFFICE(ABN: 32 790 228 959) CONSUMER CREDIT FUND(ABN: 32 790 228 959) MAGISTRATES COURT VICTORIA(ABN: 32 790 228 959) VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT SOLICITOR(ABN: 32 790 228 959) ———————————————— This goes against the constitution, corporate laws.

Supreme court (Police v Australian Govt) Police are private "Policy enforcers" with an ABN: (incorporated in the United States of America) "CORPORATIONS have NO power over the living". Refer: Rundle v Delware & Raritan Canal Company, 55 U.S. 14 HOW.8080. SIR HARRY GIBBS (ex Chief Justice of the High Court) referred to Australia's current "(Rules, they are not laws)". "The current political system in AUSTRALIA and it  STATES and TERRITORIES has NO basis in law". What is an Australian Business Number (ABN)? An Australian Business Number (ABN) is a unique number which identifies your organisation to the Australian Tax Office (ATO) and other government departments and agencies. Parliament house ABN: ABN 52 997 141 147 ATO unlawful. Governments web site for thus under thus here link. https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:1aa3044c-a462-46a59f99-17aefc641d21