Jaguar Wright: Puppet of a Darker Plan?

There’s a growing unease surrounding the recent “Defender of Truth” award presented to Jaguar Wright at the America’s Future gala held at Mar-a-Lago. For many in the activist, media, and spiritual communities, this move feels not only confusing but deeply concerning.

Jaguar Wright, a figure long associated with sensational claims, erratic behavior, and a pattern of provable misinformation, was honored by Liz Crokin—a controversial commentator whose own record includes promoting conspiracy theories and engaging in divisive rhetoric. The optics of Crokin, a polarizing media figure, presenting an award for truth to someone with Wright’s track record, has sparked serious questions about the motives behind this recognition.

But this moment didn’t happen in a vacuum. The gala, hosted under the banner of the nonprofit America’s Future, included appearances from a number of high-profile individuals: General Michael Flynn, Lara Logan, Patrick Byrne, Mel K, and other key figures in the so-called “truth movement.” What unified many of these attendees was not just their presence, but their alignment with narratives often steeped in disinformation, alternative media manipulation, and politicized fundraising.

The deeper concern lies within the nonprofit itself. America’s Future, despite its patriotic branding, has faced scrutiny for its opaque financial dealings, questionable spending patterns, and lack of clear, measurable community impact. Critics argue that these organizations—under the guise of defending liberty and truth—are often more invested in spectacle and influence than authentic service or transformation.

When awards of this magnitude are given to individuals with deeply problematic public histories, and when these moments are celebrated in elite, invitation-only settings funded by shadowy interests, it begs the question: Whose truth is being defended? And at what cost to our communities?

The public must not allow symbols to replace substance. While flashy galas, social media virality, and high-powered associations may suggest legitimacy, we must interrogate the machinery behind these narratives. These alliances are not coincidental. They are strategic. They are psychological. And they are designed to co-opt genuine movements, sow confusion, and ultimately derail progress for those truly invested in justice, healing, and cultural restoration.

As a community, we are called to greater discernment. Not all who speak loudly speak truthfully. And not all who claim to defend the people are doing so in good faith.

This is a clarion call for unity—not under false banners, but rooted in transparency, accountability, and a collective commitment to protecting our legacy. Let us not be dazzled by titles, but driven by truth that serves, heals, and liberates.