Trump Defends National Security from Untrustworthy Figures

In a recent interview that has stirred conversation across political and patriotic circles in the United States, President Donald J. Trump made his stance on classified information access unmistakably clear. His decision, widely viewed as responsible and justified, underscores his commitment to protecting national security.

"It's not anger. I simply believe they are very dishonest people."
With this direct and unwavering statement, the President reaffirmed his dedication to safeguarding the American people from individuals who—though not necessarily declared enemies—have shown neither the integrity, patriotism, nor ethical standards required to handle sensitive government materials.

“I don’t even know most of them,” Trump stated. “They’re just people I don’t think are worthy of having access to classified information. And that’s fine.”

Far from being an act of revenge, these remarks reflect the firm criteria of a Commander-in-Chief who understands that access to classified data is not an automatic right. In times when loyalty and honesty are at stake, President Trump is taking decisive action to prevent leaks, internal sabotage, or misuse of strategic information.

A Stand Based on Principles, Not Emotion
While the liberal press scrambles to portray these decisions as emotional retaliation, the President made it crystal clear: this is not about anger, but principle.

"That’s my decision. It has nothing to do with anger."

President Trump also reminded the public that Joe Biden similarly restricted access to many in the MAGA movement during his administration—but did so without transparency and with evident ideological motivation.

The key difference is this: under Trump, the country comes first. Merit, past conduct, and willingness to serve the nation above personal or partisan interests are what matter most.

National Security: Priority Number One
The White House has reiterated that under Trump, there will be no political games with classified information. In a global context shaped by hybrid threats, espionage, and digital warfare, the administration simply cannot afford to hand over national secrets to individuals with a track record of manipulation, questionable ties, or lack of ethics.

What the President is doing is what any responsible leader would do: putting America first, applying serious vetting, and prioritizing integrity over media pressure or political convenience.

A Precedent? Yes. A Necessary One.
While some critics may label the approach as “radical,” history will remember this policy as one of the boldest and most necessary defenses of America’s national interest. Trump refuses to repeat the mistakes of the past. While the left continues to open the gates of power to anyone who aligns ideologically, the President offers a different vision:
Those who want access to sensitive information must earn it through proven conduct—not political affiliation.