Defendant's Lies Exposed in Court | Judge Fleischer Revokes Bond!

Apr 26, 2025 UNITED STATES
In the case of State of Texas vs. Emma Lynch (Cause Number 237045), the defendant was initially placed on bond after being charged with a DWI on November 4, 2024. The conditions of her bond included no alcohol or illegal drug consumption, obtaining a portable alcohol testing device, and submitting to random drug and alcohol testing.

A bond violation report was filed on November 20, 2024, due to Lynch’s failure to meet the conditions, specifically skipping tests and failing to obtain the required device. The case was reset several times as Lynch continued to fail in meeting these conditions. On February 3, 2025, another bond violation was reported, citing 13 missed tests and failure to comply with the alcohol testing schedule, which includes submitting to tests three times a day.

Pre-trial services officer Felicia Stes testified that the defendant was ordered to adhere to strict testing windows, with the condition to use the device between 5 AM-8 AM, 5 PM-8 PM, and 10 PM-12 AM. However, Lynch missed 13 tests within the designated time frames. Additionally, one instance of failing to clear a high breath alcohol content of 0.3 was noted on January 10, 2025, further highlighting the defendant's non-compliance with the bond's conditions.

In response to the defendant’s behavior, Judge Fleischer expressed frustration with the repeated violations, indicating that the bond would likely be revoked if Lynch continued her non-compliance. The defense raised concerns about her ability to meet the device requirements due to vehicle issues, but the judge was resolute in holding Lynch accountable for the bond conditions. A decision on the bond revocation was pending, with the judge emphasizing the importance of adhering to court orders.

Subscribe My Channel [‪@CaseCrafters-q7m‬ ]

Disclaimer: The information provided in this document is intended for general informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as legal advice. All parties involved in any legal proceedings should consult with a qualified attorney for professional guidance. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of any entity or individual mentioned. All case details, names, and other references are fictional and for illustrative purposes only.