During COVID, an erosion of personal medical freedom occurred. - Dr. Sabine Hazan W' Del Bigtree

FULL PODCAST: https://rumble.com/v6s596v-optimize-your-gut-to-heal-disease-microbiome-revelations-w-dr.-sabine-hazan.html?mref=1bxo9j&mc=69gy3

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a concerning erosion of personal medical freedom occurred. Dr. Sabine Hazan, a prominent gastroenterologist and microbiome specialist, has been vocal about how basic ethical principles were compromised during this period.

The long-standing principle of bodily autonomy, particularly cherished by women's rights advocates, was suddenly disregarded when it came to pandemic policies. Healthy individuals who demonstrated natural resistance through repeated exposures found themselves coerced into accepting medical interventions that were still under experimental observation.

Medical data revealed disturbing trends: young, healthy individuals began presenting with myocarditis and other adverse effects previously uncommon in their demographic. The scientific community largely ignored the well-documented phenomenon of natural immunity, despite overwhelming evidence of its effectiveness in millions of recovered patients.

Critical questions regarding dosage optimization - particularly whether the spike protein concentration might be excessive for certain physiologies - went unaddressed. Most alarmingly, public health authorities mandated frequent booster administrations without establishing their necessity or long-term safety profile through rigorous study.

Dr. Hazan emphasizes that informed consent represents more than medical protocol - it constitutes a fundamental human right that was systematically violated during the pandemic. The cornerstone of medical ethics maintains that healthcare decisions should remain between patients and their physicians, not dictated by institutional mandates.

This issue transcends retrospective analysis; it serves as a crucial reminder to safeguard individual liberties against future encroachments. The central question persists: should medical decisions reside with the individual or external authorities?