Candace Owens - The Harvey Weinstein case is nuts and not nuts at the same time

Candace Owens Exposes the Harvey Weinstein Case: Justice or #MeToo Witch Hunt?

Conservative commentator Candace Owens has sparked outrage with her controversial take on the Harvey Weinstein case, claiming the Hollywood producer was "hung out to dry" by the #MeToo movement without a fair trial. Owens, who initially believed in his guilt, revealed that after investigating the case, she uncovered shocking inconsistencies that challenge the mainstream narrative.

From Believing Guilt to Questioning the Trial
"I was a huge believer that Harvey Weinstein was guilty. How could he not be? So many people were speaking out," Owens admitted. However, after two years of conversations with Weinstein and reviewing court documents, her perspective shifted dramatically: "This is insane. He was media-lynched." Owens emphasized that while Weinstein was "immoral"—running his career like a "brothel" where actresses traded sexual favors for roles—that didn’t automatically make him a rapist.

Judicial Inconsistencies: Evidence or Propaganda?
Owens’ key argument centers on the accusers’ contradictions. Several cases were dismissed because women couldn’t accurately describe Weinstein’s anatomy—he lacks testicles due to 1990s gangrene. "They all said, ‘He made me touch his testicles,’ but he doesn’t have any," she explained. This inconsistency, paired with allegations of financial motives, led Owens to conclude many sought "money, not justice."

#MeToo: Righteous Movement or Lynch Mob?
Owens slammed #MeToo, arguing it became an "uncontrolled force" scapegoating targets. "Movements grow and then find someone to hang," she stated. Weinstein, a "despicable" man but not necessarily guilty of rape, was the perfect target due to his sleazy reputation. The commentator accused media of ignoring nuance to push a simplistic "victims vs. monsters" narrative.

Final Takeaway: Media, Manipulation, and Lack of Due Process
"How much can the media make you think you’re informed when you actually know nothing?" Owens asked. Her analysis raises concerns about due process in the age of viral justice, where public pressure can overshadow facts. Though Weinstein was convicted, Owens insists the case sets a dangerous precedent: guilt by reputation, not evidence.

#CandaceOwens #HarveyWeinstein #MeTooExposed #JusticeOrRevenge #BiasedMedia #DueProcess