Dr. Paul Thomas – “Data was So Robust, my License was Yanked & was Viewed a Threat to Public Health”

4 months ago
1.73K

Dr. Paul Thomas is a pediatrician (retired) and author of "The Vaccine-Friendly Plan" and "Vax Facts - What to Consider Before Vaccinating at all ages and stages of life".

He is a champion for informed consent and medical freedom.

Pediatrician, Dr. Paul Thomas conducted his own internal retrospective study as he had 500 of his patients who had never received a vaccine, so he decided to compare them to the all his vaccinated children to see if there were any differences.

What he discovered could take down the entire vaccine agenda.

Truly one of the most damning studies to the vaccine industry.

The data flat out speaks for itself and the results clearly demonstrate that vaccinated children are very sick children and unvaccinated children are very Healthy children.

This retrospective study is crystal clear. Unvaccinated children were healthy after 10 years and Vaccinated children were sick.

The data was incredibly powerful.

Once his study was published it only took 5 days to have the government “vaccine police” revoke his medical license3 and deem him a threat to public health.

Just like that, Dr. Thomas was marked a very dangerous man. He is not dangerous to the public and his patients, but he is dangerous to the health of Big Pharma – the vaccine makers.

The last the thing the government agencies who act as the vaccine police want is a study that is easy to understand, a study that needs no “washing”, no manipulating, it’s just a factual study of true data that is clear as bright blue, non-chemtrailly, sunshiny day; which is rare.

Dr. Paul Thomas:

• “The CDC has never done a single study comparing one year to the next.”

• “They have never compared the full schedule to no vaccines or partial vaccines.”

• “We have looked at every single patient born into my practice, we looked at 10 ½ years of data.

• “There was no Cherry Picking, there was not we are going to exclude you for this or that. Every baby born was looked at and we looked at every single office visit.”

• “We stratified them according to the number of vaccines they had.”

• “We had 500 who had ZERO Vaccines.”

• “We had around 3,700 that had some vaccines.”

• “What we found out was even mind-boggling for myself.”

• “The one thing I am absolute on, is Informed Consent. You, the parent get to decide what gets injected into your baby, if anything. You should always insist on that or walk out of that doctors office.”

• “Because we do informed consent, we had a growing number of unvaccinated patients and what I was CLEARLY seeing is these kids don’t’ get sick.”

• “The don’t get chronic conditions. The data spoke for itself.”

• “Over the 10 year period, the more vaccines you had, the worse you were. We looked at infections, ADHD, Neurodevelopment issues, Eczema, Allergies, it doesn’t matter what we look at, they all skyrocketed in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.”

• “This data is so powerful – that within just 5 days of it being available online, they yanked my license.”

• December 3, 2020, the Oregon Medical Board had an Emergency meeting and they suspended my license.”

• I was supposedly a threat to public health.

This study was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

The study was called “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination”

Abstract of Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Study by Dr. Paul Thomas2.

*Note: This study was retracted as the Oregon State Medical Board ruled that Dr. Thomas was a threat to public health, when he just proved his patients were healthier compared to the National Average.

Abstract
We performed a retrospective analysis spanning ten years of pediatric practice focused on patients with variable vaccination born into a practice, presenting a unique opportunity to study the effects of variable vaccination on outcomes. The average total incidence of billed office visits per outcome related to the outcomes were compared across groups (Relative Incidence of Office Visit (RIOV)). RIOV is shown to be more powerful than odds ratio of diagnoses. Full cohort, cumulative incidence analyses, matched for days of care, and matched for family history analyses were conducted across quantiles of vaccine uptake. Increased office visits related to many diagnoses were robust to days-of-care-matched analyses, family history, gender block, age block, and false discovery risk. Many outcomes had high RIOV odds ratios after matching for days-of-care (e.g., anemia (6.334), asthma (3.496), allergic rhinitis (6.479), and sinusitis (3.529), all significant under the Z-test). Developmental disorders were determined to be difficult to study due to extremely low prevalence in the practice, potentially attributable to high rates of vaccine cessation upon adverse events and family history of autoimmunity. Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to 0.063% of the (partially and fully) vaccinated. The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling. Our results give agency to calls for research conducted by individuals who are independent of any funding sources related to the vaccine industry. While the low rates of developmental disorders prevented sufficiently powered hypothesis testing, it is notable that the overall rate of autism spectrum disorder (0.84%) in the cohort is half that of the US national rate (1.69%). The practice-wide rate of ADHD was roughly half of the national rate. The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.

Sources:

1. freedom_knocks -- https://www.facebook.com/reel/641976868777151

2. Lyons-Weiler, James, and Paul Thomas. “RETRACTED: Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 22, Nov. 2020, p. 8674. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228674. *Note: Dr. Paul Thomas - Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Study.

3. “Pediatrician’s License Suspended in Oregon Over Vaccines | AP News.” AP News, 9 Dec. 2020, apnews.com/general-news-48d917259b7985e6e335c67773507c62. *Note: Dr. Paul Thomas license suspended for publishing his Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated study.

PROTECT YOURSELF: Protect yourself, your children and loved ones from the harmful EMF from the newly installed 5G Towers. We are constantly being Bombarded by Harmful Radiation, being hit from all directions, every single day.
Up to 75% OFF!

Hope & Tivon’s EMF Protection Products:

https://www.ftwproject.com/our-special-offers/ref/528/

Check out the Special Offers on all the EMF PROTECTION Products – including:

1. Phone & Laptop Shields
2. Pyramids
3. Sleeping Pods
4. Charge Plates
5. GardenSets
6. Shungite Tiles
7. Pendants.

***PLEASE FOLLOW My BLOG → https://mrnavac.blogspot.com/

END. 4/11/2025 9:00 PM
*******************************************************

Loading comments...