Premium Only Content

Conspiracy . Campbellteaching . award ceremony
April 8, 2025, Dr. John Campbell /Campbellteaching
We were badly misled about the event that changed our lives. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/16/op... Since scientists began experimenting with dangerous pathogens in laboratories,
the world has experienced four or five pandemics.
1977: Russian Flu
Almost certainly a research accident. https://armscontrolcenter.org/wp-cont... Scientists quickly suspected the strange Russian virus of 1997.
2020: Speculation about a lab accident – crackpots and crackpots.
Crazy/eccentric/quarrelsome to feel superior/fantastic/insane
Many, public health officials, prominent scientists – conspiracy theory
A nonprofit organization, the EcoHealth Alliance
Lost a grant for planning risky research on bat viruses at the
Wuhan Institute of Virology, lax safety standards
But
77 Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies joined forces to defend the EcoHealth Alliance
consensus.
However, we have since learned that some officials and scientists, in order to create the appearance of consensus, have concealed or downplayed key facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns by supposedly independent voices
and even shared experiences on how to conceal their communications to protect the public from the whole truth. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2... Donald McNeil Jr. said their efforts to derail him influenced the newspaper's coverage of the theory and likely contributed to the issue being shelved for a year.
Details of the Wuhan lab's research have now emerged – safety precautions may have been shockingly lax.
Is this just history?
Anyone who needs convincing that the next pandemic is just an accident away should watch Cell. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science... Researchers, former and current employees of the Wuhan Institute of Virology,
describe how they took virus samples from bats and experimented to see if they could infect human cells and pose a pandemic risk.
"Inadequate for working with potentially dangerous respiratory viruses."
You'd think we'd have learned by now that testing possible gas leaks with a matchstick is a bad idea.
And one would hope that prestigious scientific journals would have learned not to reward such risky research.
Why haven't we learned our lesson?
To admit now that it's risky—must it have always been risky?
And that we may have been deliberately misled.
When a novel, bat-related coronavirus broke out in Wuhan, and researchers soon discovered that the pathogen shared the same rare genetic trait that the EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan researchers had proposed for bat coronaviruses (https://theintercept.com/2021/09/23/c...), one might have thought EcoHealth would have sounded the alarm widely.
But it didn't.
Without the public records requests, leaks, and subpoenas, the world might never have learned of the disturbing similarities between what might have happened in the lab and what was spreading in the city. (https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeu... https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2... The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2)
(Nature Medicine, 2020) https://www.nature.com/articles/s4159... "We consider a laboratory scenario implausible."
However, we later learned through Congress's subpoena of their Slack conversations that while the scientists publicly dismissed the scenario as implausible, many of the authors privately considered it not only plausible, but even probable. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/science/a... https://theintercept.com/2023/07/12/c... https://reason.com/2024/06/18/anthony... Evolutionary biologist Kristian Andersen (Slack messages)
"The lab-escaped variant is so damn likely because they've already been involved in this kind of research, and the molecular data is completely consistent with this scenario..."
---
2024 Nobel Prize award ceremony
Broadcast live on December 10, 2024
Join us live in Stockholm for the Nobel Prize award ceremony which takes place at the Stockholm Concert Hall, Sweden, on 10 December – the anniversary of Alfred Nobel’s death. At the ceremony, the Nobel Prize in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature and the prize in economic sciences are awarded to the Nobel Prize laureates.
-
LIVE
The Charlie Kirk Show
1 hour agoZero Percent Approval Democrats + Two Million Deportations | Bergquam, Sec. Noem, Bowyer | 8.29.2025
2,791 watching -
1:52:52
Tucker Carlson
46 minutes agoSSRIs and School Shootings, FDA Corruption, and Why Everyone on Anti-Depressants Is Totally Unhappy
1.98K10 -
1:59:29
Tim Pool
3 hours agoIsrael VS Palestine DEBATE, Misfit Patriot VS Rathbone | The Culture War with Tim Pool
94.6K127 -
LIVE
Side Scrollers Podcast
2 hours agoBlizzard BANS Player for Saying “n00b” + Cracker Barrel Ends PRIDE Funding + MORE | Side Scrollers
269 watching -
LIVE
Simply Bitcoin
1 hour ago $0.79 earnedNEW DATA: FORGET The CRASH The Bitcoin Supply SHOCK is ACCELERATING | EP 1321
213 watching -
4:22
Michael Heaver
2 hours agoLabour Make DISGUSTING Decision Against England
44 -
1:05:42
Lara Logan
15 hours agoINSIDE THE MAR-A-LAGO RAID with Trump Attorney Christina Bobb | Episode 33
17.3K1 -
1:38:45
Steven Crowder
4 hours agoAI Celebs Just Scammed Women out of Millions & Premium Interview w/ Patrick Christys
201K135 -
43:48
The Mel K Show
2 hours agoMORNINGS WITH MEL K -This Labor Day Celebrate Liberty, Freedom & Family! 8-29-25
14.2K1 -
59:02
The Shannon Joy Show
3 hours ago🔥🔥The Butchers At Hilo Benioff Hospital Hawaii - Mom Subjected To Forced C-Section & Abuse🔥🔥
20.1K2