Premium Only Content

Well at least Rumble still likes me :)
a quick check in after a turn of events and a change in path. And a big thank you to all who asked for me to check in and showed some care. It is more appreciated than you know.
thank you for your viewership❤️
----------
Connect:
https://x.com/canuck_celtic
[email protected]
Support:
https://buymeacoffee.com/celticcanuck
THE NECESSARY COPYRIGHT BIT...
MUSIC :
Music from #Uppbeat
https://uppbeat.io/t/tobias-voigt/wooden-heart
License code: 9WZGHCQT2B8MB4CK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources are listed on-screen and fair use is intended for reporting, documentary, review, and criticism purposes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
copyright
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
copyright disclaimer -
Under the Copyright Act, the following purposes fall under the fair dealing exception:
research
private study
education
parody
satire
criticism
review
news reporting
Fair Dealing
Marginal note:Research, private study, etc.
Infringement of Copyright and Moral Rights and Exceptions to Infringement
29 Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright.
R.S., 1985, c. C-42, s. 29R.S., 1985, c. 10 (4th Supp.), s. 71994, c. 47, s. 611997, c. 24, s. 182012, c. 20, s. 21
Previous Version
Marginal note:Criticism or review
29.1 Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review does not infringe copyright if the following are mentioned:
(a) the source; and
(b) if given in the source, the name of the
(i) author, in the case of a work,
(ii) performer, in the case of a performer’s performance,
(iii) maker, in the case of a sound recording, or
(iv) broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.
1997, c. 24, s. 18
Marginal note:News reporting
29.2 Fair dealing for the purpose of news reporting does not infringe copyright if the following are mentioned:
(a) the source; and
(b) if given in the source, the name of the
(i) author, in the case of a work,
(ii) performer, in the case of a performer’s performance,
(iii) maker, in the case of a sound recording, or
(iv) broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.
1997, c. 24, s. 18
-
7:59
Celtic1Solo
5 months agothe administrative annexation of Canada
1.85K18 -
4:22
NAG Daily
12 hours agoSaving Grace #4 — Is The BIBLE Wrong?
3.15K5 -
6:14
Sugar Spun Run
22 hours ago $0.29 earnedApple Cobbler
1.47K4 -
31:26
Clownfish TV
6 days agoJimmy Kimmel GONE FOR GOOD?! Insider Claims Disney is DONE! | Clownfish TV
4.71K25 -
7:53
Rethinking the Dollar
11 hours agoForget AI & War: This Is What Will Break You in 2026
2.28K3 -
20:03
Bearing
7 days agoGIRLFRIEND Reveals Her SECRET KINK 😂 (It Doesn’t Go Well) 💥
8.31K84 -
56:23
Coin Stories with Natalie Brunell
1 day agoLyn Alden: Bullish on Bitcoin & Hard Assets
4.44K -
8:10
MattMorseTV
17 hours ago $14.20 earnedSchumer's PLAN just IMPLODED.
25.9K62 -
2:11:52
Side Scrollers Podcast
19 hours agoYouTube ADMITS BLATANT Censorship + California Wants to FINE “Hate Speech” + More | Side Scrollers
77.1K15 -
15:18
GritsGG
15 hours agoSweaty Quads w/ Bobby Poff!
18.5K6