Dr Astrid Stuckelberger: Synthetic Biology with Nanocircuits that Go with 5G

SUBSCRIBE -> https://forbiddennews.substack.com

And I want to answer to, you know, what is in the job and what's going on with the 5G. You know, the question that Pascal said, ask Astrid, because it's very important. I've been into one of the first ones who really read and said there is oxide graphene.

Some scientists in Spain, Professor [Pablo] Compra found, you know, massive oxide graphene in nanoparticle in the job in June 2021. And then he made another report final in November 2021. And then others made like Professor Arne Burkert made very scientific, really in the lab of like a medical analysis of the job.

And he did in front of lawyers. He said this is a crime against humanity. Anybody jabbing this thing is – it's Pfizer.

It was Pfizer is is a criminal. And he found he confirmed oxide graphene. He confirmed parasites.

He confirmed metal; chrome, nickel that should never be there or massively – nanoparticle.

And then, he also confirmed there is a RFID-type of thing thing in there.

So he did a very interesting move. He took lawyers to say and to affirm. Now, there are others. And it's very interesting, you know, how we go in a creamy scene.

We have one more element, one more, some contradictory, some not. A lot of people are talking of mRNA mRNA spike mRNA, but they never really give the nature of this mRNA. And two scientists started to do the whistleblowing, Dr Nagazi in Canada and Dr Monteverde.

And for me, that was a key to this crime scene. And they said that to for something to be biological, you need phosphorous and nitrogen. And they found nothing like that in all the vials they saw.

And it was confirmed again, after. So, it's not biological. What is in this little vial is not biological!

So what is it? It is synthetic nanotech. Yes. And and beyond maybe other things we don't know.

You see, I leave it open, because we are in such a crazy situation of evil that we have to be open so that we can stop and treat people. So now in the scientific community where I speak a lot, you know, in conference, I show the graphic of first question. Is it biological or not? It's not.

It's synthetic. David Martin said they should never have accepted those patents. They're all synthetic, not biological.

Then, you you start explaining. But if you explain mRNA, you have to define if it is synthetic or not. You have to say, "Is it a nanorobot?"

Do you call mRNA or do you call mRNA? The consequence of a causality and the causality is something synthetic and like a robot, which I think that is.

The mRNA spike is only an effect or an element of this nanocircuit and nanotech, because it's not possible that spike protein is everywhere in the body after an injection.

So it is the transport to oxide graphene is like a flying carpet. I've made a report on that flying carpet.

And it's – you can put a genome, you can put a parasite, you can put a bacteria and you can code it. And it mimics the code of a molecule, because we have the codes of molecules with Dr Ben Vavis in France. And Professor Montagnier tried to steal all his findings and then he got killed.

You know, so we know that bio coding exists since 50 years, but it's become very sophisticated now. And they can send this bio code to the oxide graphene. It's a terahertz.

It can stock. You probably know that it can load the data up to terahertz and it can send it. And so it is like a computer.

Bill Gates is perfectly suited to know, with his engineers to develop this with DARPA. So we know this, that this can take control of the mind and of the body. And I invite everybody who has not seen this fantastic video of Dr Charles Morgan of DARPA.

And he's teaching on YouTube, the military, how you oxide graphene can take command of someone on the other side of Earth through Wi-Fi and it's called psycho neurobiology and war. I don't know if you've seen it.

I'm going to be a speaker of that for a few days to make it. Today, we have Dr Charles Morgan to talk to us about neuroscience and psychology and a whole gamut of things. Right now, he is a professor of National Security Studies at the University of New Haven.

His focus is teaching National Security Studies, Domestic and International Intelligence Analysis and issues.

Dr Morgan is developing a concentration in the human aspects, intelligence analysis and Psychological Operations arenas, that are relevant to the Intelligence Community.

He has a pretty robust background, with military folks doing research at Sears School, helping with selection processes for Special Operations Forces, down in Fort Bragg, etc.

So, without further ado, I'll hand it over.

So what I would like to talk to you a little bit about today is something I was asked to do in 2010 and 2011. I was getting ready to leave, over at CIA where I'd worked for a number of years.

And the intelligence science board said, "Could you give us a brief on what's in store for us in the future?"

I was like, "I don't know. Predicting the future is really hard." So I told my boss at the time, I said, "Well, I think the best I'll do is make an estimate over what I think is going to happen in the next five years."

Given certain technologies that were being developed at the time – and this is a bit of an extension of that – I present it to the SSG.

And it was some information I think some people didn't know. And I think it's good for people to be aware of what's going on out there.

The one thing that makes predicting a little bit of the future easier, when you look at biomedical science is that labs are working fairly systematically with overtly-stated goals.

But the really fun part was that you're taking over somebody else's physical body with the mind of another human. So what do you think would be the next step? You follow medical research: You say you can make a robot move.

You can make a human hand move. What would you do next? You say, "Wow, they're getting brains connected to run things."

You have to begin to think either like doctors or like security and intelligence people.

Can you actually send and receive sensory information, like the Matrix? Dr Venter's work is, in my view the equivalent of the development of nuclear weapons, when you realize that he created life in a cell back in 2010.

I don't know if people are familiar with his work, but this technology paired with something called CRISPR, which is like an editing software for genes, makes a number of things immediately available. What he did is he programmed yeast cells to produce anything he wanted.

They can produce perfume. They can produce petroleum. They can produce any peptide, anything we program the DNA to do.

And it's in the living cell. So in medicine, the goal in medicine now is to be able to do designer medicine and therapy. If we can design a cell to get into your body and release the right product for you, you won't be losing half the drugs you take through your liver when you swallow a pill and it gets digested.

These can be inserted into you through the hypospray needles, almost like Dr McCoy on 'Star Trek'. It just blasts, now plasmids into your squamous cells.

But Venter was able to do that and has the patent on the technology.

But you can engineer anything. It's how it's done. You put in a specific gene splicing. You program what you like. You put it in the cell and it can reproduce and make as much as you like. It's very interesting.

Yeah. Yeah. When people are not convinced, I show them.

Go and see this and you will understand already a bit. Go and see the "Pandemic Preparedness for Zombies." You will understand.

Go and see that the ID in is in the body of people who are dead. And even in the cemetery, you know, and go and see the autopsy that what they're taking out of the blood is something like couch. But nobody's really describing it.

And I suspect they're afraid to say really what it is, because they don't know. Because when there are two or three scientists who said something very interesting that goes with this, I scientist plasma going around. It's that there is a parasite as an egg.

If you put it at the temperature of the body under microscope, it develops and the egg bursts out and something comes out with tentacles. And that's what you find in in the in the autopsy. So there is something in the investigation we're going through.

There's a lot to still, you know, go and seek and to understand the causality of causality and not only talk of this. And I'm fed up of this. And it's a messenger.

It's not more. I got censored in Stockholm in a conference because I said, "Go and look at the genome-editing document that WHO produced, because this is important. But the cause of the cause is a synthetic injection with nanocircuits that go on with 5G."

It's been evidenced by experts who recognized and did it, that it is a nanocircuit. It's beyond what doctors know, what normal scientists know. And we have to get every engineer in or veterans who have who know anything about nanoparticles and nanotech to come and help us to understand what's going on, because we have to know how to detach this from the body and clean.