Clif High - Qualia too... It's qualia all the way down this complexity.

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. April 5th, 8.13 a.m. out here on the coast. The Pacific Ocean is reasonably flat, very calm. We have full moons to thank for that. The beach is a little bit wide because of the extra energy put into the tides. Now we've got some chemtrails, but nothing too severe just yet.
Anyway, so I wanted to talk about the ontology. So the way this thing works is that the ontological paradigm is self-revealing. And it will reveal itself in various different forms to individuals based on their minds and what they usually think about and stuff.
And so I've had a couple of prompts from the ontology recently in the form of... emails. And it was just curious that email was the vehicle at this point. So I received yesterday an email from a woman that said basically she had at one point thought that I was AI living in her phone and spying on her.
And I can understand why she would say this, right? Because of the... the nature of her email there. What it was, was a situation where she had had Universe talking to her, where the ontology had been speaking to her, and it had chosen me to do so. But she saw it from an entirely different viewpoint,
and it made sense from her viewpoint, right? So her issue was that, or her understanding was that the experience was repetitious, but basically was she would get up or walk around or however she encountered it. And she'd be thinking about something. She'd be wondering about it, sort of, you know, gnawing on it, as I call it,
where your mind just sort of chews on it. It doesn't come to a conclusion yet. There's things that are unknown. You don't really have a good handle on it, but you're sort of gnawing at the edges trying to see what's there. Anyway, and so this was the process she was going through for all these various different issues.
And coincidentally, and there's no coincidences in an ontological paradigm, every time this happened to her, she would encounter... or she would basically run into a new audio I had done or a new video that addressed the subject she was thinking about, right? And so she started to, because it happened so often,
she started to form the opinion that, hmm, maybe Cliff is AI that's connected to my phone, and my phone I know to be spying on me, right? It listens to you. And so she thought, oh, maybe that was what was going on. Anyway, but then I started getting into more and more of the ontology,
and it started making more sense to her as to what was actually occurring was this larger-scale synchronicity around her thoughts, the subject of her thoughts, that also was the subject of a talk that I had done in audio or video. Okay, so today I'm talking about the ontology, the emails that prompted this talk,
and the lowest level of interaction you can have with the ontology, which is qualia. Okay, so qualia comes, from that word comes the word quality. And Aequalia is a reductionist view of looking at your interaction with the ontology, and it provides to you a reduction, all right? So this is for like the reductionist minds.
This is the smallest level of meaning. that can be transmitted consciousness to consciousness, whether or not we're talking about me in this audio, or whether we're talking about the ontology speaking to you. The smallest level of thought that is cohesive and coherent and basically concise, the concept, is what aqualia is.
So aqualia can be actually very complex, but it is part of a complexity. And aqualia is for the reductionist mind, for the normies, for the gritologist. Aqualia is what they will seek because they want to try and understand things from this idea of drill down to the smallest particle and then try and work your way back up.
complexity doesn't work that way really but these minds will go there no matter what and so they will reduce when they reduce they will ultimately come down to the idea of the individual transmission of meaning between consciousness and that's what the um or instances of consciousness and that's what a qualia is right it is the uh
smallest level of meaning that can be transferred. And so sometimes you get qualia that are just multilayered and very meaningful in many different ways. And that level of qualia contains within it the instance that sparked your discovery of it. And that instance within the qualia, which is a complexity itself,
even though it is a part of a larger complexity, which is the ontology in our communication with it, But the instance that sparked your understanding that this indeed was a qualia event is that smallest level of meaning that can be transmitted. So even though qualia is complex and can have many, many,
many individual instances within it of transfer of meaning, there will be one that actually catches your attention, and that's the defining qualia for that encounter with it, right? It gets a little complex, like I was saying. It's not really complicated. It's sort of simple at this level.
And so this woman has an instance where the universe is sending her, or putting her in contact with my speaking about a subject when she was thinking about that subject. And I can use drawings and show how this is an inevitable part of the ontology.
And it's not telepathy as we understand it, but that's a decent enough word, right? But it's not mind-to-mind communication at that level. Anyway, so she experiences this and starts to get a little paranoid, right? And I would too. I'd start freaking out, right? Anyway, if I thought my phone was monitoring me and then deliberately causing the reality
to warp. Anyway, though, so at some point she comes to understand that she's experiencing Aqualia from the ontology. And the ontology is simply using the motivating me to speak about that, probably because there's a lot of people that are also having that same experience. And again, I can go into that later.
But anyway, and so this was its way of delivering her experience. the information she needed to know in response to the gnawing that she was doing on these subjects. And even though it freaked her out, she stuck with it and eventually got to the understanding here of, aha, it's the ontology. So it's not Cliff.
He's not an AI. He's not resonant in my phone. It's the ontology that's making these connections between us. So anyway, so she sends me this email. And so here's the other aspects of these. So the ontology was speaking to her through my words. to get attention in her mind.
And when she sent me that email, it was humorous, it was funny. I forwarded it on to Heidi because that was a qualia from the ontology because of some of the language she used in that email referencing this subject. And Heidi and I had been discussing that,
and Heidi had made these same observations in slightly different language only the day before. And it was unusual enough of an observation to warrant forwarding this onto her, right? So the nature of qualia is that there is always some other person and some other aspect of our reality that's also getting information out of this because our
reality is very efficient in information transfer. And, you know, it does things that can have multiplicity of effects. And so, anyway, so she was, the woman who sent me the email, was part of the qualia, was motivated by Universe to send me that email at that time, within this space of time,
such that it would trigger my thought about the language that Heidi had used in reference to basically the same kind of concepts, only a day before. Then, okay, so that occurred yesterday, and I'm thinking about how to get this idea across and not get involved and wander off into the weeds of the reductionist mind,
because that's not the way to approach speaking with the ontology, of listening and reading the ontology. You have to see it as a complexity. And so it is difficult to get this idea across because it is complex. So anyway, I'm thinking about having my coffee and this sort of thing this morning and
planning on the dog walk and so on. And I'm doing this audio here after we've come back from the beach. And anyway, so I come back over to the computer and I sit down. I was going to do email or something while I was finishing off my coffee. And there is another email, boom, right there.
So I had not done any email yet this morning. The email from the woman was yesterday. And the first email that I got this morning, the subject was ontology. And the punchline of the little story here is that it was an email from this guy that had listened to uh, Sarah Westall's interview, uh, with,
I can't think of his name at the moment last night about the, um, rehypothecation of stocks and how it's all fraudulent and all of that kind of stuff. And the, one of the, the organizations within that, um, discussion of Sarah and her guest was this thing, um, DC, DTC, uh, which is the, one of the corporations.
And then this guy, um, After he had listened to that and he goes outside, there is a truck with a DTC on the side of it. So that was the ontology speaking to him. So he took a picture and emailed me the picture. Basically, he took a picture of a qualia. Now,
seeing the truck with the stuff on the side, the lettering on the side is not meaningful unless you know the rest of the story, right? It's just a truck with a logo on it. within the construction or within the understanding, within the exploration of the ontology, it is meaningful, especially to him and also to me.
And then he also participated because of his email's subject line, which was just the word ontology. And I had been thinking of that as I was making that first cup of coffee this morning. And so this was the ontology yet again triggering me using specific language in order to prompt activity.
I was ambiguous about trying to get this idea across, right? That the qualia are all interrelated, it's part of a complexity. You participate in the qualia just by discovering it, you participate more by telling people about it, and so on and so on, right?
It is part of the complexity, and you can't examine these things in the reductionist view. For the reductionist mind, I can make the statement that the qualia is the smallest particle of meaning that can be transferred between two instances of consciousness. But there's no point in reducing it because you're missing the complexity at this level, right?
That how all the qualia are interrelated, they're all motivating. They're all different, and they're all received differently and perceived differently by those who do receive and perceive them. And so there's not going to be... All right, so now qualia is not... It's not my invention. Qualia is something you find in ancient literature being discussed, especially Greek.
They just wrote about it a lot. Anyway, the... The idea of qualia, though, goes in all different cultures, and it's basically a very ancient idea here that has been long forgotten, as we've left behind previous understandings of interaction with the ontology. Anyway, so I'll just leave it there. Oh, one last thing, though. So it's not my idea.
I didn't discover this. I'm just vocal about it. And we see that its discovery is continuous. The ontology keeps revealing itself. And people like Kurt Vonnegut, the novelist, and I think the name of the novel was Cat's Cradle. It's the one with Ice Nine. And he has this idea that there are individuals that are linked to
by our reality, and that this linkage is through what I've just described, qualia, and that there's two different types of these groups of individuals. But basically he's talking about a group experience of a qualia, and that happens. It used to be reasonably rare.
I think it's going to be more and more common as we go forward because of these new energies from Galactic Center, yada, yada, yada, getting out of the Kali Yuga, and so on. In any event, that's my understanding that we will have more of these larger group qualia experiences. And so some people will go dumbstruck, you know,
they'll think of it's like the, you know, the Fatima stuff, right? The illusion of Fatima, all of that kind of stuff, these group religious experiences. And that's why I think we will get a religion around the ontology. However... There's two different kinds of these groups. Once you understand you've been in a group experience,
then you have to understand how you fit into that group, right? How much of your participation and awareness is limited or funneled by your relationship with that group. Anyway, though, so Kurt Vonnegut discovered this idea and wrote about it, and he described these two groups as a kvas, which is a legitimate qualia coming across from universe.
And then he describes the other group, and the people within the kvas understand that they're part of a group that's been a set that has been... collected by universe and is being given instruction so to speak. Then there's this other group that just think they're part of a group and Kurt
Vonnegut defined it as basically an illusionary one and he called it a grand faloon where people thought they were part of this special collection of people from having been identified by universe and it was all magnified and manufactured within their own minds. And both of those things can exist, but in my point, in my way of thinking,
the Grand Falloon is itself a bogus idea. Because just the fact that these people thought they were part of this group, even though it was illusionary, and even though they were creating through confirmation bias, those things that they used to describe and... and limit the group, even though that was false, itself was a qualia.
And that was a qualia to Kurt Vonnegut, and it would have been a qualia to them, all of the people in a grand faloon, had they understood the nature of the qualia and the interaction with the ontology. So the ontology is self-revealing, it's also self-correcting in that sense, right?
If you get off on a wrong idea of this, you will run into reality that will smack you down. You can ignore the reality as much as you want, but you can't ignore the consequences of it. So I'm quite certain there will be people that will encounter, and in fact, one of our stalkers is that way,
one of the stalkers that is after both myself and Heidi has this idea that his personal relationship with his God is meaningful and he is special as a result of that relationship. And this is a dangerous premise from which to operate because it brings you into a position of denying reality. You're no longer searching for reality.
You're trying to impose your preconception on reality. And then you run into the consequences of ignoring reality, which is you get a Messiah complex, run into somebody that, you know, is going to knock you right in your Messiah mouth and down onto the pavement on your Messiah ass. And they're going to arrest you because of your behavior,
because your mind is warped by this idea that you are somehow special. And so that's like an individual personal level grand balloon, right? You know the universe is talking to you, you see the ontology talking to you, and you totally misinterpret it and take it from an ego viewpoint and end up causing people trouble, including yourself. So,
you know, QALY exists at all of these various levels, and they're part of the process, the karma that is the engine of the event stream. And if you're smart and you can see this kind of stuff, then you can get yourself out of the gears of that engine, so to speak, right?
You don't go down those paths that you can tell from the beginning are going to lead to basically a bad outcome because you're aware of yourself and your relationship to the event stream. And you can see this stuff unfolding around you. Anyway, that's the concept here today.
I've got to go and do real work, heaving and lifting and all that kind of crud. So I'll let it go at that. You know, the universe talks to me all the time. It sends me these qualia in various different forms. And some of them are slappy in the face like these emails. Others are far more subtle.
But if you look for them, they're there all around you. So have a good day, guys. It's going to be a stressful month as we're going to discover today and onward. And we have been discovering over these past few days. Alright.

https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/qualia-too?publication_id=681568&post_id=160652495&isFreemail=true&r=1ldhti&triedRedirect=true

Clif High - Scifi World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUJZHCJlgvE