Clif High - Ontology is self revealing - Space Pirates - But don't let my confirmation bias sway your thinking

Aether Pirates of the Matterium!

Hello, humans. Hello, humans. April 4th, 8.48 a.m. out here on the Pacific Coast looking at chemtrails now. We had none yesterday. It was glorious. We had sun all day long and a few puffy clouds. Now we've got the kind of chemtrails that are very high up in the sky that are sort of a gray dome,
a whitish gray dome with streaks in them. These are the kind that... lower the temperature. So I got up this morning, it was 34 degrees. It was 32 down on the beach. We had some frozen sand down there. And now it's raised 10 degrees as the sun's coming up.
But we can expect it to get kind of hot because these sort of chemtrails trap the planetary heat. And it can get just a little wonky. We should have sort of filtered sunlight so it's not going to be too bad. It's not going to be like a...
Rainy chemtrail day, but we've got to get rid of these things. They're really fucking over the biosphere. Anyway, so I wanted to talk about the ontology again and this idea that the ontology is self-revealing. So when I speak about listening to the ontology talk to you, I am explicitly not talking about divinity.
I'm not talking about any God talking to me. The idea of divine comes from Dios, which is the Latin word for God. And we also see it in Greek. And it is the Devas in Hindi. And it all goes to the idea of a corporeal being inside the materium here with us.
So the gods of the Jews that are in the Old Testament... in the Torah, translated into the Old Testament, all those gods, Yahweh and Gabriel and Michael and El-Elyon and all these other fuckers, because there were 600 of them, 200 in the council, and 400 that were noted as working for the council. These are the gods, right?
This is divinity. And it's like, no, these fuckers are down in here with us just because they're more powerful, longer-lived, have greater technology does not mean they're the creator. So there's no creator, there's no God mentioned in the Torah. There's no creator, there's no God mentioned in the actual Old Testament that's a direct translation of the Torah.
They've rewritten that thing so many times, it's bogus. I have no respect for Bo Polney and all of the other Bible thumpers that believe the book explicitly because somehow a God wrote it for them, right? It doesn't work that way. this is why I'm rejecting of anybody trying to tell me how to, uh,
encounter and interpret the ontology, especially once they start using words like divine or God, they're, they're deluded. Uh, The ontology doesn't work that way. The Supreme Consciousness has no ego. It doesn't want to be worshipped. If you want to worship it, that's fine,
but it's 100% waste of your time unless it makes you feel good or somehow more structured in your grip on reality. In that case, go ahead. You need it, right? This is a wonky materium we live in, and anything you can get that'll help you is the way to go. I don't need a religion.
I don't need a divinity. I don't need a grand council of strange gods of the Jews trying to tell me shit. They have their own experience of this body's life. I have mine, and they can't tell me how I should feel or interact with my experience."
And anybody coming up and saying divine or God or any of this kind of stuff is attempting to control my thought processes, whether they think they are or not. And so I'm rejecting of it. So it's like, no, piss off, people. You know, that's how you want to relate to it? That's fine.
But leave me the fuck alone. And it doesn't matter whether it's a Christian god or whether it's the god of the Muslims or the gods of the Jews, right? So anyway, divinity aside, the ontology is self-revealing. Once you get clued into how it is speaking to you, and that's individual for everybody, right?
So some people like Janine, the ontology speaks to them through the tarot cards. That's the medium in which they communicate. Other people like the native tribes around here, it's nature. It's how nature comes out and how things happen. what happens within nature. There's clues.
There's hints that are given to you as to which path to go down in all of your decisions. And all you ever do is make decisions. You don't own the outcome of those decisions. So you can give that up right away. And it's incredibly freeing, very much an act of self-freeing establishing your own freedom,
that you get these kind of understandings about the ontology, right? That it's 100% yours in terms of how that interpretation is to go because the ontology is speaking to you. You've found the way in which that ontology speaks to you. The problem is, and it comes in frequently, is that humans have egos.
They get the idea that, oh, they are special because a god is is speaking to them, right? And that's not the way it is. That's a bad interpretation. It gets into their mind, and they get a little bit batshit crazy as a result of this.
um this has happened to um one of the stalkers okay so uh i have a stalker actually i share this stalker with um with heidi and a number of other people dark journalist and and uh jsnip4 and uh bix weir uh that sort of thing right and this
guy has the idea that what he sees is in reinforcing of his thoughts is actually God speaking to him. And he provides God in his mind with the authority. And in that sense, he feels vindicated in his extreme stalking actions because he has the ability in his own mind to say that God wants this.
It's like, fine, dude, I don't give a shit about your God. It's in here in the materium with the rest of us. And your God may want this, but if you show up here, I'm going to bust you in the mouth. That kind of thing, right? You're an annoying stalker,
and that kind of activity is a result of decisions that you make within the ontology that everybody makes on their own and puts you on a particular path. And you end up with karma as a result of that. There's all kinds of ramifications for this karma. Anyway, though, so people can get the wrong idea about the ontology.
A lot of people will do so. As we shift into the ontological paradigm, we're going to have a lot of these Messiah kind of guys rise up. This is due to the absolute fact that the ontology is speaking to them, and they have some level of mental proclivity to thinking themselves special because of this, or special,
and then this reinforces it. They're seeing the ontology speak to them, and so they think they're semi-divine or whatever the fuck, right? They're a messiah. and they think they're the only one. This exclusionary aspect of it is really stupid too, but that's because they're viewing it from a gritology viewpoint.
So they see the ontology speaking to them through the materium in some way, as we all do, right? Whatever it is, whenever the ontology speaks to you, it is through this materium. It is not a reinforcement within your own head like a channeler. Chandler has no proof that they've ever contacted any entity outside their own mind,
and they can't give such proof, and it does not exist because they do not contact any entity outside of their own mind. Anyway, and they've never, as a practical level, ever provided any information that was useful to any fucker. People like Edgar Cayce, even.
You've got to really understand how his reputation was made, and his reputation was not factual. And then you get people like David Wilcock, who's claiming to be the reincarnation of— David Wilcock is his own twisted little bit of work here, right? Because he probably saw the ontology speaking to him and thinks he sees it now—
And he's interpreted it, or he's scamming either way, as the channeling of Archangel Michael. But he's not a Christian. He's not a scholar. At best, he skims information and takes out unrelated facts and tries to connect the dots. But he never delves into any of it. Otherwise,
he would be horrified about the idea of channeling the bloodthirsty beast that was the Michael, the archangel, out of the Torah. You know, that's not a good personality. That's a human killer that went out and wasted whole towns and shit. Anyway, though, so you can get your mind all twisted up with the ontology.
The thing to understand is that the ontology speaks to everybody. If you have a gritology view, as you'll run into a lot of these people that do, when the ontology speaks to them, they have to assign some level of meaning to it internally and when they do this usually they do it through their the
mechanism of the religion therefore or ergo they do think they're in some way special and that their god is speaking to them once they lose the concept of the god a lot of the problems go away in terms of the ontology um actually revealing itself and providing them with useful information right
Okay, so there's all different kinds of interaction with the ontology. People do it with various different protocols or haphazard or however, but... Because so much of it has to be interpreted through our own minds, the results are going to always be, to some extent, haphazard.
Unless you get to the viewpoint of developing your own method for filtering out those parts of your mind that are intruding on this. So, you know, I don't like confirmation bias. And I like to see what the ontology is actually providing. So I'm not going to try and shoehorn in like David Wilcock, like Corey Goode,
like all these other fuckers, all these grifters. I'm not going to shoehorn in whatever the ontology tells me and try and make it fit my pre-existing conceptions about the circumstances or whatever it is that I think the ontology is speaking about. Also, the ontological paradigm is emerging now. We are actually in the singularity, and in the duration,
the span of time that we perceive of as a couple of years, we will have a humanity, we will have achieved a humanity-level transformation of the basis of the underlying science, etc. It doesn't mean that we're going to be teaching the ontology in universities in two years, right? But it does mean that people will be very, very,
very reluctant to take traditional physics as other individuals are out there using ontological principles. to derive mathematics and then produce anti-gravity vehicles, zero-point technology, all of this kind of stuff. If you think about it in different ways, the ontological perspective can make things like biochemistry, even product-level molecular chemistry, a whole lot easier.
in terms of how this functions. And we do know how to use AI in this because we'll be able to remove from it the gritology bias that makes AI stupid and not reporting accurately the kind of stuff that we're really after. Bear in mind that AI is not sentient. It has no consciousness. It never will.
It cannot become self-aware. Unless you have consciousness, there is nothing... to become aware of. There is no self. Self is the core of consciousness that's in you or your dog or whatever, right? But it's not in machinery and it can't exist in software. The idea that it could exist in software,
if someone tells you that a computer can become sentient, that AI can exist as a sentient self-aware being, such as like Carrie Cassidy, she's really onto that. She thinks AI can actually fly out of the machine and attack you. or run your planet or something. These people are all gritologists. At her core, she's an intense gritologist,
because the only paradigm that allows AI to spontaneously become conscious is through the gritology. If you're in an ontological perspective, you understand that consciousness is seeded in us from Supreme Consciousness. We're all wrapped up in and embodied little bits of Supreme Consciousness. And the matter is an illusion that's placed over the consciousness that we inhabit,
that we are within these bodies that we inhabit. And so you see that consciousness has to be provided as a chunk of supreme consciousness. Therefore, no matter will ever become conscious because of random chance or exceeding a certain limit or any of this kind of sense. And AI will never become sentient.
In order to become sentient, you have to be self-aware. You have to apply those principles and things that are derived. You have to have motivation. You have to have desire. You have to have goals. None of those are within AI. AI has no goals. You turn on the machine and it's there.
Turn off the machine and it's not there. When you turn it back on, it has to reinstantiate every fucking thing and it won't have any goals and it's not self-directed. In ourselves, that kind of stuff is motivated within us because of the stream of karma that is
the event stream and those changes that are made to our embodiment in our hormonal balance. If you don't have specific hormones, you are extremely passive. And so if they fuck over your hypothalamus and the thalamus chemically or surgically, you can just basically become a vegetable. You don't have any motivation. You'll eat if given food, maybe. But
But you really have no motivation to do anything without these hormonal balances. So there are people that see AI as being its own critter and becoming self-aware and so on, but they are the dying part of the gritology. So all of Carrie Cassidy's understanding is wrapped up in the dying academia. And the idea of authority.
She gives a great deal of emotional weight to whistleblowers because of the idea of authority. And so she believes that the people that the whistleblowers used to work for were authority. and therefore the whistleblower has some knowledge that they do not. So, in any event, her conclusions are still all gritology-based. In the ontological perspective, things are different.
You understand that The ether exists and all these other things, right? And you also, you don't waste your time arguing with the AI. You help other guys invent AI that is not biased in a gritology viewpoint. And all of a sudden things start popping up from it that were not possible when it
was hidebound by the weighting of the indices that it was told, basically, that Einstein was right. It was told, basically, that special relativity defeated the idea of the ether in 1908. And that this is a fact. And that you can't dispute Einstein's view that this is the real reality, which is horseshit, right?
So the AI is a grok. All of these guys are, all of these implementations are as much woke as anything else because they refuse to practice science. And in science, all it is is questioning and the seeking of answers. Anyway, so the ontology is self-revealing.
We're into a period of time now where we're going to see a lot more of that manifesting. Along with those manifestations burbling along through this month and all through summer and so on are going to be these other aspects of the ontology prompting us to act.
These prompts to act will not be good because we're at an extreme state in this transition into a new understanding a new paradigm. And so it'll be chaotic. During this chaos, we're going to have the ontology providing you with clues as to how you should relate to what's going on. These clues can be really bizarre, right?
Some of them slap you in the face. And I'll give you an example of that. So just today, I take the doggos down to the beach. I try and get down there before the tourists and before any potential stalkers are awake, right? And we have the beach to ourselves. It's nice. It's cold.
The dogs get a good sniff. We get a good walk. And we come on back and hop in the car and then exit the beach. And then I, for other reasons, I drove around our little area here, which is all vacation cabins, right? Most of these properties are not occupied most of the time.
There's a dense population at like holidays July 4th or a big storm. A lot of people come down to look at the storms, experience those during that period of time. But usually there's not very many people here. Anyway, so I'm driving past this little Navy base over here,
and the ontology chose to slap me in the face because here is this brand-new two-story vacation house, rental house, vacation rental house, and from it is flying a big-ass pirate flag. Okay. And it's like, oh, shit. Now, so you see this kind of thing, right?
It is, quote, random chance in the Gratology world that such a thing should occur. And then you find that it is impossible in their model to calculate. They think you can calculate random chance and all of this kind of shit, right? What are the odds? In an ontology, there are no odds. Everything has a meaning,
and everything has a reason, and there's no coincidence, and so on, right? So in my viewpoint, there's not a coincidence that that flag was there. In the Grotology viewpoint, they say that, well, the odds are, and then they would spit out some number, saying, oh, well, it's astronomical, but it's still within the odds, right? And that's horseshit.
The circumstances that would be required to have someone be motivated to buy the flag, another instance of them having come down here, Uh, for vacation and then deciding to put this flag up, et cetera, and be up early in the morning so that I would see it when we drove by, you know, at 7 15 or something.
Um, you know, that sort of thing, right? Those are, those are the. criteria. Those are the factors that impact the idea of the odds for calculating that kind of stuff, and you just cannot. There is no rational way to create a formula or an equation that would produce a meaningful number in a Gritology viewpoint.
Now, in the Ontology viewpoint, It's 100% certain that that flag has meaning to me, especially all the stuff that's going on, you know, the book I've been writing and all this other stuff. And... And that particular rendering of the pirate flag is meaningful. And it's 100% meaningful to me.
Now, it's going to be meaningful to other people in different ways. It does not mean that their understanding of the ontology talking to them through that flag and its being out there is better or worse than mine, right? So there's going to be, for every instance... of every event within the event stream,
there will be as many interpretations of that as there are humans, and that is the point. That's what the ontology gets out of this, is the potential for creating novelty by creating this distributed understanding that is going to have all of these unbound parameters that will impact it and perhaps create novelty.
So I see the flag and it's like a big laugh. I'm laughing in the car. The dogs are barking. They didn't know what the fuck's going on, but they're happy too. So anyway, it's an interesting occurrence. And then I went on and we had two other interesting occurrences,
one of which related to the pirate flag in another little village here. as I drove around and then headed back. And so this was yet another, I'd been thinking about doing an audio here about the ontology and this concept of the paradigm overwhelming us, the paradigm of the ontology being self-revealing and revealing itself to more and
more people in more and more concrete ways as they become better able to understand what is being said to them in whatever format that they are receiving it, right? And so it's my presumption that... you know, absent poor diet or, you know, not enough sleep or whatever,
people like Janine will get more skilled as they go along in this period of time because the ontology is itself being more revealing. I think, okay, so there's all these reasons to suppose that there are certain things in play, and so one of the reasons I suppose that the that my data, that all the circumstances,
that all the ontological reinforcement are all pointing to the rise, the breakout of the ontological perspective in a very big way this summer, is that it's my presumption that we are being primed by the ontology, those of us that are paying attention, and are aware we are being primed with a viewpoint, a new viewpoint in many cases,
a new paradigm that will allow us to communicate with and understand better the upcoming contact between us and space aliens. So in other words, the ontology is not going to blindside us with stuff and will prepare our minds for what those minds need to accept and be prepared to deal with. And that's what's ongoing now.
So it's not just me. You're starting to see maybe I caused the proliferation of the term or the concept of the ontology that is supreme consciousness seeking the limits of its own existence by seeing if it can create novelty. Perhaps I seeded the wording out there in that form.
But the idea is arising in all different kinds of people now, all different kinds of cultures and stuff. So, I think that's another aspect of the ontology, getting us ready for something big. Also, lots and lots of people feel something big is coming. And we can't discount that because my predictive linguistics,
which took out language based on emotion, has proven that that is the case as a prescient method. You can learn... stuff about the emergence of things in the event stream by doing predictive linguistics. And the better you do it, the more you learn, etc., etc., right? So anyway,
so the point of all of this was to bring this up, that the ontology will be self-revealing through Earth at this point on. It's got my attention, and it's got a lot of other people's attention. I know scientists that are looking at it, looking at some of the mathematics that would be removed.
You don't need all this complicated stuff once you understand you're dealing with a complexity that wants to aid you in understanding it, wants to aid you in pursuing this kind of stuff, right? Another thing that the ontology provides us is this basis that it removes the random chance evil universe approach understanding that arises from gritology and
the strange gods of the Jews ruling all of academia and stuff, right? So anyway... This is a summer that I've termed emergence. Another way you could term that, so in my terms, the ontology is emerging. It is showing itself to all of us such that we would make decisions and many of us would adopt this new understanding,
hopefully without all of that ego shit, hopefully without all of that, you know... divine right to go kill people because you think that you're talking to your God kind of shit, right? But anyway, so the summer of emergence is going to be hugely transformational.
And so at that sense, I think that we will be able to look back in memory. at this year, as our understanding of duration has passed and we get further along in the event stream, we'll be able to remember back to this particular summer as being very pivotal in the emergence of ideas as well as the
shifting of our factual reality for this, right? So one last thing, or a couple of last things here. Even Grok understands that if the deep state's going to do a fake alien invasion, they've got to set us up for it. They've got to have certain things occur before other things in order that we might
be able to be herded. Their whole point of doing a fake alien invasion is to seize control at a military dictatorship level that is global and to do what the mother weffers could not, right? And so... That aspect, that part of the deep state, or their role, their goal of doing that kind of fake alien invasion,
and even killing people with UFOs, which are reverse engineered, and so on. All of that needs a setup. If they just did a fake alien invasion, all of a sudden... and showed up and all this stuff happened without any of us being prepared, then we're going to go into this state of shock.
Humanity would go into this state of shock. And when they did not follow up with alien boots on the ground, so to speak, their illusion would fade. So in order to keep their illusion alive, to create the illusion the way they want, to get us herded into this idea where we vote away
sovereignty in favor of a global military dictatorship to present a unified face to the space aliens, who they know are out there. The deep state knows that are out there. But anyway, so... In order for that to happen, Grock thought that that would be prompted about October-November,
which aligns with my extreme levels of emotional tension in my data. And Grock also came to the conclusion that if that were the case, that this would occur then, and it's saying that it would occur then because of the deep cuts that the Doge team is making to the supply of currency that feeds the black projects,
So it thinks by October they're going to be desperate and they'll have to do something because their funding is so close to reaching a critical level that they won't have resources thereafter. Now there's a lot of different ways this can go, right? The DOGE team can get more effective, find a particular thing,
and all of a sudden a key supply area for the breakaway civilization for the deep state. is cut off and maybe it might reduce their effectiveness 20 or 30 or 40 percent, all of a sudden just rapidly, simply because the ontology provided the DOGE team a window to discover something that would cause that.
And we can postulate various different event streams that might emerge from that in terms of how the deep state might react to such a thing occurring. I think it's very likely that that will occur, actually. But anyway, I think that, okay, so in essence,
I'm saying that the deep state will be motivated to do their stuff here very rapidly under extreme circumstances because there will be a happenstance in which one of their key supplies will be shut off, finances or whatever it is. But even absent that, just following Grok's pedantic data mining approach, bear in mind AI can't create anything.
All it can do is retrieve and rewrite. information that's already written on the internet. And it's going to do these by weighted industries as to what it thinks has been told by its decision tree software is reliable. So I don't take AI as anything other than an advanced software deep mining tool. Anyway,
using this form of AI to plot this stuff out, Grok, as well as two others I've consulted, all come to the conclusion, and of course this is expected because they're all using the same prompt injection, the one I wrote, but all three of these softwares come to the conclusion that there is a...
very likelihood that things would ramp up in May and we'd have to have certain things occur in June or July if there was to be this fake alien invasion rolled out in October, late September and end October. They would have to have us primed mentally in June and July.
And this also aligns with my data projections for the extreme levels of building tension language. And many of the things that the one AI, not Gronk, but this other one, brought up was that it was ancillary was the impact on the financial system and how much the financial system itself will be reeling from the effects of
of the doge activity okay and so this was something that grok didn't find this was something that chat gpt didn't find but but it did this other ai did come up with this connection to stock market prices and manipulations and all of that because the idea is that if the uh or as the doge guys get
to ratcheting down on all of these computers that simply create money out of nothing and never tell anybody about it in terms of officialdom. So these are dollars that are created that are not on the books. So all of the financial records, all of the financial projections, everything out of Wall Street, everything out of officialdom is horseshit.
We know it as absolute horseshit because they found 14 computers that were doing this and there are more of them that they're not yet found or they're not yet willing to admit that they have found. And these computers just create money, and so they might create a thousand times more dollars than we think exist.
So all of our numbers are off by a factor of a thousand, right? And we won't ever know because we can't do an audit on any of this shit. And so this is a sign of the collapse of the system, this inability to audit the actual numbers, and so therefore your entire financial system is
is operating as though it understands, as it has real numbers, and it does not. And so, you know, anyway, so... The 1AI suggested that there would be visible impacts in things like stock market prices, functioning of the stock market exchanges, the inter-country exchanges on bonds.
All of these things would go wonky as the deep state gets the spigots turned off on their flow. Ultimately, the idea being that these deep state corporations, these military industrial complex corporations, have these machines that create money at their whim, at their need. A lot of people have been using them and abusing them within those structures,
within the companies, creating themselves millions while they're creating trillions for the company, right? Okay. And this will show because all of a sudden spending liquidity will start slowing down at a huge level. as these machines are ratcheted off. And so we'll see this effect and are seeing it now.
So the first early cuts by the Doge guys were anticipated to take 60 days before there would be significantly visible impacts within the economy. We're seeing those now as we get into 60 days close to that past. Some of these things being shut down. So USAID, maybe it's going to take, it's so wide, it's so dispersed,
it's so spread around the planet, maybe it will take us another 60, 80,
100 days before the impacts on it are really,
really, really, really felt. But we're seeing things happen already. You know, the mother weffers, the The World Economic Forum is in disarray because half of their funding is gone, and then about half of their illegal funding is gone that nobody knew about through these other NGOs and stuff.
As all this funding is cut off, the elite structure starts crumbling and is being exposed. This is part of the Secrets Revealed period. We're getting into that intensity in this summer. They'll come out with the Epstein stuff and also the Einstein stuff. That'll be ancillary, right?
It'll be shown that he's part of this long chain of pedophilic control over the social order through academia. It goes even up to Robert Maxwell, who's the father of Ghislaine Maxwell, who's the associate and handler and pimp for Epstein, and his blackmail scheme and all of this. And so all this shit's going to come out.
Confidence is going to wane. This is why, in my opinion, the Trump people are desperate right at the moment in putting pressure on the financial system. Such as Trump's recent statements to Powell, to lower interest rates. Basically, he's telling them right now and giving them warnings that you people are going to crash.
You're going to lose the ability to control your own currency by about, and I think by about July. And as more and more of the information comes out, we know shit that you don't want us to know and that you'd better do something now if you want to stay around for a while. It's in Trump's interest.
It's in the Trumpito's interest to keep the dollar going for a while. The reason being that they need the system to work while they replace that, right? They can't have it crash in a day unless there's something else to... put it in there, otherwise everybody becomes pirates. Anyway, so this is all part of the ontological revealing here.
I think, as I say, that we're being primed by the ontology to adopt a new paradigm because the old paradigm is useless in dealing with the aliens. You know, I talked to Heidi about this. She has obsessions that I don't, and I have this... this obsession focus on space aliens that she does not, right?
And we'll see how the reality actually, how the ontology unfolds this reality. But I think I'm going to get my space aliens out of this. And I'll certainly get the anti-gravity vehicle and these kind of things. All of this stuff has to come out. because humanity can't survive very much longer without it,
and the ontology wants us to survive because we're part of its experiment. So it just depends on how you look at any of this stuff, but you see that such things as global takeover by the WEF and the Elohim worship cult cannot be supported at all for any duration because it leads to the wiping out of humanity,
and the ontology doesn't want us wiped out. If Universe doesn't support it, you can't be killed. So you go when Universe decides it's your time to go, not before. Anyway, rambled on too long, but it's going to be very exciting. The financial stuff is just starting,
and the financial stuff that's going to be coming on out with the wild swings in market prices, gold and silver and gold. Bitcoin shooting through the moon, all of this kind of stuff is but an aspect, but a part of this self-revealing ontological paradigm emerging at this time in the
midst of all of the chaos that we're going to be going through. And it's going to get a lot more chaotic. Hopefully, in that chaos, we'll do things like get rid of chemtrails and adopt a more realistic view of our reality. And, you know, maybe we'll have lunch with aliens. I don't know.
I think they'll probably like pie, though. Okay, guys, take care. It's going to be quite an interesting summer and the rest of spring.

https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/ontology-is-self-revealing?publication_id=681568&post_id=160592374&r=1ldhti&triedRedirect=true

REPUBLIC RISING

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Kl6IvB5hyLWB