Alleged Claim: Attorney Mike Davis Suggests DC Federal Judge Sent $2 Million to Hamas

*Attorney Mike Davis: Did a DC Federal Judge Approve $2 Billion for Hamas?*

Attorney Mike Davis has suggested that a major terror financing scandal might be unfolding in the United States. According to Davis, Judge Amir Ali—a federal judge in Washington D.C. appointed by President Joe Biden and the first Muslim-Arab judge in that role—may have authorized a $2 billion transfer that could have potentially reached Hamas, a group designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. Davis hints that Ali’s judicial decisions might have indirectly supported extremist groups.

*Activist Judges vs. National Security: A Supreme Court Case*

Davis, founder of the Article III Project, has pointed to an emergency case before the Supreme Court that questions whether some judges are overstepping their authority and undermining presidential power. “A month ago, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett did not intervene to halt these questionable decisions,” Davis noted, implying that this inaction may have had significant consequences.

He has suggested that “Judge Ali might have allowed transfers of funds that could have ended up with Hamas—money that may now be funding violent acts against Israelis and possibly Americans.”

*Who Is Judge Amir Ali?*

Appointed in 2022 by Biden, Ali has drawn scrutiny from critics who point to:

- Alleged connections to pro-Palestinian groups.
- Rulings that some view as controversial on border security issues.
- Positions that certain observers describe as activist on immigration matters.

Davis has cautioned that “a judge with potential conflicts of interest might not be suited to oversee sensitive financial decisions.”

*Supreme Court at a Crossroads: Will It Step In?*

The filing before the Supreme Court seeks to address:

- Whether limits should be placed on judges whose actions might undermine the presidency.
- Whether certain judicial decisions, including those some tie to the 2020 election, warrant review.

“Are radical judges weakening the presidency? Or will the Supreme Court fulfill its role?” Davis asked rhetorically.

*Terror Financing: Why the Media Silence?*

While major outlets like the NYT and CNN have not covered the story, Davis has hinted at:

- Possible recent funding to Hamas from Western sources.
- Decisions by Judge Ali that might have blocked efforts to track such funds.

“This isn’t about conspiracy—it could be a serious judicial misstep,” Davis remarked.

*Conclusion: Justice Under Scrutiny*

The Supreme Court’s ruling could impact:

- Oversight of judges with activist leanings.
- Efforts to combat terror financing.
- Concerns over ideological influence within the judiciary.

#CorruptJudges #JudgeAli #Hamas #MikeDavis #SCOTUS #Trump2024 #TerrorFunding #JudicialOversight