Gov Conspirators In JFK Assassination NAMED In Bombshell Testimony!

1 Apr 2025 MIAMI
Get on your independent health journey - https://wearechange.shop/

Gov Conspirators In JFK Assassination NAMED In Bombshell Testimony!

Highlights
🎤 Congressional Hearing: Led by Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, focused on declassified JFK files.
📜 Witness Testimonies: Included Oliver Stone and journalists, who emphasized the need for transparency.
🕵️‍♂️ Government Deception: Testimonies suggest possible government obstruction regarding JFK’s assassination.
⚖️ Calls for Reinvestigation: Stone and others advocate for reopening the assassination investigation due to new revelations.
📚 CIA’s Role: Discussions centered on potential CIA involvement with Lee Harvey Oswald and the implications of those findings.
🔍 Patterns of Malfeasance: Witnesses highlighted a concerning pattern of misconduct by intelligence agencies.
📺 Media’s Role: Mentioned the potential withholding of critical footage pertaining to Oswald’s involvement.
Key Insights
⚖️ Accountability in Government: The hearing highlights a crucial need for greater accountability from intelligence agencies. As witnesses called for a reevaluation of past investigations, it draws attention to ongoing concerns about overreach and negligence within America’s governance structures.

🔍 Declassification as a Tool for Transparency: The unveiling of the JFK files signifies the importance of making classified information accessible to the public, facilitating informed discourse over historical events. This process is a necessary precedent for future issues regarding transparency in government operations.

🕵️‍♀️ Investigative Needs in Historical Context: Oliver Stone’s call for a renewed investigation indicates how historical narratives often require reevaluation in light of new evidence. This perspective encourages both lawmakers and the public to reconsider established conclusions in light of ongoing debates and revelations.

📜 Intelligence Community’s Credibility at Stake: The testimonies that suggest the CIA may have misled the public about Oswald’s connection to the assassination reflect a significant crisis in public trust. Continuous revelations about governmental actions may erode confidence in intelligence agencies if not addressed transparently.

🔐 Information Overclassification: The frustration expressed over the “stonewalling” of documents suggests serious issues related to national security protocols. The balance between security and public knowledge is critical as these histories remain vital in shaping current governance.

⚡ Patterns of Misconduct: The claims of multiple false statements by key intelligence officials touch on the broader implications of government integrity. Such systematic misconduct could imply extensive operational failures and ethical lapses, straining public trust.

📈 Future Implications for Governance: The discussion indicates a growing awareness of the historical actions of government bodies and opens a dialogue surrounding modern accountability, with potential ramifications for current governance practices. This existential reflection could catalyze reforms in how intelligence and government operations are conducted and scrutinized moving forward.

WeAreChange

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P71S3jbnr4