Trump and the Limits of Presidential Power

They said Trump would be a dictator. However, judges have the power to overturn his executive orders.

The President of the United States said enough to transgender activism within the military, since the purpose of the armed forces is to defend the nation from threats, not to fulfill gender, diversity, equity, and inclusion quotas.

Moreover, we can see how the Chinese military has strengthened. The Russian military, enemies of the United States, are even promoting masculinity in their soldiers, as is the case with China, while in the United States, we see soldiers dressed as Drag Queens and engaging in behaviors that have nothing to do with a soldier’s strength or the security of a nation.

He can still appeal his progressive judges' ruling, but for now, it is clear that he is not as dictatorial as they claimed. On the contrary, he faces many obstacles.

Since Donald Trump's return to the presidency in 2025, his administration has faced strong judicial resistance that has systematically blocked many of his key initiatives. Federal and state judges, mostly appointed during Democratic administrations, have issued rulings that obstruct policies on immigration, security, the economy, and civil rights, creating a scenario of judicial sabotage.

Examples of Judicial Blockades:

Immigration:

Courts have suspended executive orders that toughen deportations and restrict asylum, arguing they violate human rights or administrative procedures.

Attempts to reinstate policies such as "Remain in Mexico" or measures against sanctuary cities have been halted.

Sports and Gender Rights:

Judges have blocked Trump’s executive order prohibiting males from competing in women’s sports, citing discrimination.

Economy and Energy:

Efforts to reduce environmental regulations and revive energy projects have been paralyzed by courts on grounds of environmental impact or procedural deficiencies.

Justice Department Reform:

Attempts to investigate and sanction corruption within federal agencies have been obstructed by court rulings limiting the Executive's authority.

Impact and Government Response

The Trump administration has denounced that the judiciary is being used as a tool of political obstruction. It has pushed for appeals to the Supreme Court and is considering reforms to limit judicial activism while seeking to accelerate the appointment of judges aligned with its constitutionalist vision.

This clash between the Executive and the Judiciary has led to a constant legal battle, hindering the implementation of Trump’s policies and highlighting the conflict between the government and the judicial establishment.