Unlock Your Rights: Quarantos, Jurisdiction, and Freedom Explained!

5 months ago
9

Grand Sheik Taj Tarik Bey- 'Quo Warrantos' Are Necessary To Keep Governments In Check.
The video discusses the importance of civic education, Quarantos, and legal rights within governance.
[06:28-07:35]
Speaker Grand Sheik Taj Tarik Bey introduces the House of Reawakening Minds, discusses the neglect of civic knowledge, and emphasizes the importance of understanding jurisdiction and Quarantos.
And because these things have been neglected and ignored On multiple levels, many people have been suffering for generations unnecessarily, only because they have been fooled, tricked, robbed, misrepresented, et cetera, due to the fact of a lack of knowledge of jurisdictions and a lack of knowledge of ,, which issued by the people to anyone who were claiming right over land, economics, authority, power, assumed power of attorney, et cetera, anything of that nature. And particularly with anyone, any man or woman who claims an office in government, an authority over a liberty, et cetera, in any political jurisdictional platform. Now, this is necessary. because these matters have been neglected.
[07:35-09:52]
The speaker explains the nature and significance of Quarantos in governance and its role in ensuring rightful authority within structured governments.
And so we're just going to go in general and talk about this issue of what the nature of a quaranto is. And we're going to give it to you from ancient and modern jurisprudence. And so you keep in mind that of the promotion of the principles of jurisprudence have been promoted around the world on in a what you call a generally accepted platform known as international law principles, i.e. treaties, et cetera, constitutions. And I think that people in general, many people have demonstrated that they don't understand or comprehend or overstand or even understand the nature of constitutions. When you're talking treaties, you're talking constitutions. So keep this in mind. These are rules of law. And the Quarto is in place in any structured government to assure that any man, woman, et cetera, operating any venue that claims right or authority or power of attorney over any national, any Aboriginal, or any citizen of any political jurisdiction, that that being is the rightful being, rightfully authorized, rightfully settled, rightfully placed, rightfully acting are due and controlled by the limited or delegated authority assigned by law to such man, woman, or person, et cetera, or organized agency of any type that's exercising any authority whatsoever. are in place in the nature of both a delegation of authority order, a certification, And all of these things are bound or demonstrated by what is known as a solemn oath, which is demonstrable and is to be displayed and ......... as you would say, shown to anyone who challenges the jurisdiction of such persons who are claiming authority.
[09:52-13:22]
The narrator introduces legal terms and their implications, specifically relating to the challenge of authority and rights associated with legal offices.
So let's talk about quote-unquote in their nature. So we're going to go to Henry Campbell Black's Law Dictionary of Ancient and Modern Jurisprudence, et cetera. And you will find this also in your other law dictionaries, The Nature Of. Quote-unquote. In Old English practice, a writ in the nature of a writ of right. So when you're talking a writ of quote-unquote, you're talking about a writ of right. So look at that in the same nature. against him who claimed or usurped any office. Again, it is a writ that challenges anyone who claims an office or a right to any office. And for the most part, for those who have been suspected of, and usually it occurs, have usurped an office. who have usurped a franchise, who have usurped a liberty, and to inquire by what authority he or she has affirmatively and verifiably to support their claim to that office. in order to determine the right and it lay also in a case of non-user or long neglect of a franchise or misuser or abuse of a franchise being a recommending the defendant i.e or the accused of the authority etc to show by what warrant he or she exercises such a franchise having never had any grant of it or having for or forfeited it by neglect or abuse or forfeited it by misprision or by treason etc

Loading comments...