Unfair Court? Know Your Rights: Challenge Jurisdiction!

#Facts. The Wise do not with-hold knowledge they Share it, Thank You Taj Tarik Bey. Your Work has truly Uplifted fallen Humanity.
The video discusses issues of legal misrepresentation and the importance of understanding jurisdiction in judicial proceedings.
[71:44-74:16]
The chapter highlights the misrepresentation of legal rights and the confusion surrounding the right to counsel in judicial proceedings.
This is why you have the diversity issue in Article III, Section II. dealing with ministers ambassadors consolers and so in order to muddy the water when they introduce the uh 14th amendment operations they would say you have right to counsel c-o-u-n not c-o-n-s-u-l and it sounds similar but it's not the same thing and they have successfully uh uh imprinted on the people's mind a right of con of counsel when the deal is they have right of counsel so i just want to throw that out there and so your interjection or rebuttal in any what you call jurisdictional proceeding under any so-called municipal a venue of misrepresent because remember this is also important to remember if the venue that is called or presented to you as a s a court is not article 3 section 2 it is not a court cannot be a court never was a court never will be a court any operatives that claim ministerial authority as judge etc is essentially committing treason and they're lying and they've been doing it for generations another reason why we're having this conversation your counter move with them your rebuttal would not be an issue of guilt or not guilt it's not even related it would be an interjection of a writ of century which would be for your information in inquiry and this would be also related to a bill of particulars or what you call a discovery pre uh pre-action or pre-jurisdictional claim and this is why they also don't want people to know that the right of the beings to challenge jurisdiction pre during and or after any so-called proceeding is the standard of law that's another reason they don't teach that and this is again how they have through to our people being ignorant of administrative functions have been prosecuting people unfairly and imprisoning people for crimes.
[74:16-76:05]
The chapter outlines the standard protocol for legal representatives and the importance of awareness in leadership regarding due process and jurisdictional challenges.
or violations that they didn't commit or even that they did commit and then were wrongly prosecuted without due process, not knowing that they were denied due process, et cetera. But they'll counter move or rebuttal as a standard of protocol. And this will be like, say, for anyone who's a member of any organization or body's politics that says they are a nation or says that they are a tribe who says that they were a clan, any one of them, all of their leadership already know, and it's not an attack, I'm just telling you the truth, that's a writ of certiorari is a standard protocol for all ministers who would take the position at that time of consul, because they'd be wearing 2 crowns. And this will be the same thing saying any business crowd or any indigenous body or member of any indigenous clan or tribe. If there's an interchange with the operative operative indirect government, whether you deal with the municipal corporations, a city, state or federal, the interregnum. operatives all the diversity is already existing it doesn't arrive it already exists however the rights of protections are voided if the presented people is not presented in certiorari an administrative right of challenge of jurisdiction, which would be the certiorari. And so that would be harmonic with a discovery and a bill of particulars.