Cicero on Oratory - B2 - XXXI XXXII

Cicero on Oratory - B2 - XXXI XXXII

In this video, Cicero discusses the nature of oratory and the importance of understanding causes related to general propositions rather than specific cases. He critiques those who distinguish speeches based on their relation to persons and times, arguing that all controversies relate back to general questions about their nature. Additionally, Cicero emphasizes the necessity for orators to focus on general arguments rather than getting bogged down in specifics, ultimately aiming to improve clarity and effectiveness in oratory.

Key Points:

Critique of Distinction in Causes
Cicero highlights a flaw in how some consider the types of causes, distinguishing between general and specific. He argues that this distinction is overly simplistic, as all cases must relate to general principles and questions.

Importance of General Questions
Cicero stresses that the essence of any controversy lies in its relation to general questions. Even when disputes arise about specific individuals or events, the arguments must connect back to broader themes and norms.

Multiplicity of Causes vs. General Principles
He points out that classifying causes by individuals leads to confusion, whereas focusing on general principles simplifies understanding. This perspective encourages orators to learn and internalize fewer, but more impactful, arguments.

Relevance of Names in Arguments
Cicero mentions that the names of individuals involved in cases do not influence the arguments made. The essence of the oratory lies in addressing the general questions relevant to the context of the controversies.

Call for Accurate Distinction
He urges for a more rigorous approach in the classification of causes, advocating for a clearer understanding and explanation of general concepts over superficial categorizations tied to specific instances.