Kendrick Lamar crushes Drake - Motion to Dismiss...Because it's True.

Save
Streamed on:
440
News

#drake #kendricklamar #notlikeus #potentiallycriminal
Drake, the Canadian rapper launched pre-litigation action against Universal Music Group, Spotify, iHeartRadio, and others based on allegations that the companies conspired to push Kendrick Lamar's song "Not Like Us" by manipulating the streaming views and other things to inflate popularity of Lamar's song at the expense of Drake's musical works.

In response, Kendrick and UMG records have dropped an interesting Motion to Dismiss, that's pretty spicy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MERCH
*TeeSpring - https://potentiallycriminal.creator-spring.com

DONATE
*Venmo: sean-martin-462
*Zelle: [email protected]
*Paypal: [email protected]

CONTACT
* Email - [email protected]
* Actual Mail - PO Box 716, Willoughby, OH 44096

LINKS
*Locals - https://potentiallycriminal.locals.com
*Rumble - https://rumble.com/PotentiallyCriminal
*Odysee - https://odysee.com/@PotentiallyCriminal
*Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/potentially_criminal
*Kick - https://kick.com/potentially-criminal
*BitChute - https://bitchute.com/potentially_criminal/
*Discord - https://discord.gg/Aad4KdwVya
*Website - www.seanpmartinlaw.com

Nothing in the commentary or responses provided by Sean P. Martin, Esq., Martin Media LLC, or Martin Law Office LLC, expressly or implied, shall be deemed to be legal advice and shall not be construed as the creation of an attorney-client relationship in any way. The viewer has responsibility of obtaining legal advise from an competent and licensed attorney, and is urged to do so. Support of this channel or purchase of any affiliated products or services does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. Any opinions expressed herein are my own and do not reflect those of any organization, association or group.

All references or clips that may be used on this channel are for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hughes v. Benjamin, 437 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2020); Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

Copyright Martin Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5660283745075200

Loading 1 comment...