The fruit of Vatican II after 60 years – the transformation of the Catholic Church into a New Age pseudo-church /Part ten/

Watch this video on: https://vkpatriarhat.org/en/?p=26390

Subscribe to BCP newsletters https://bit.ly/3cJLzzm

Anniversaries of two Councils: 1,700 years of Nicaea and 60 years of Vatican II

The Council of Nicaea and all three subsequent councils – the Councils of Constantinople, Ephesus and Chalcedon – spoke out against heresies that attacked the nature of Jesus to deny that Jesus is true God and true man, the only Saviour of mankind. The attack was hidden and insidious. Councils of faith always speak out against heresies that deny the fundamental truths of our salvation. The Second Vatican Council (1962-65), on the other hand, secretly promoted the pan-heresy of modernism. After the Council, the so-called spirit of Vatican II imposed this heresy on all theological schools, not by specific proclamation, but covertly, under the authority of the Pope and the Council. The modernists, through the so-called scientific historical-critical method, have succeeded in reviving heresies long condemned.
Saint Pius X called modernism the synthesis of all heresies and condemned it in his encyclical. Why is modernism the synthesis of all heresies? Because it contains the heresy of Arianism, which was rejected by the First Council of Nicaea in 325, and other heresies that covertly attacked the Nicene Creed. The Council clearly articulated and bindingly established the fundamental truth of the faith – the divinity of Christ. It is expressed in the phrase: God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father.
Current modernists, instead of preaching salvation in Jesus Christ, have introduced an erroneous teaching about so-called historical Christ and so-called Christ of faith, whom the first Christian community dreamt of. This statement is an utter nonsense. Historical-critical method in theology denies the redeeming death of Christ on the cross. German bishop Zöllitsch stated in 2009 that Christ did not die for our sins, but only in solidarity with those who were suffering. This is a blasphemy and perversion. Having been influenced by historical-critical theology, many authors deny Christ’s historical as well as actual resurrection. They lie in a suggestive manner and unabashedly claim that it is just a symbolic, superhistorical, eschatological, mystical etc. resurrection.
Historical resurrection of Jesus Christ is a proof of His divinity and with the same token, it confirms all that He had been teaching and doing, and it compels us to receive it in faith. The basic truth, namely that Jesus is Saviour, and rose from the dead, was the main premise of the apostolic preaching. Peter told the Jews: “You, with the help of wicked men, put Him to death by nailing Him to the cross... God has raised this Jesus to life, and we are all witnesses of it.” (Acts 2:22-24.32) The apostles suffered and sacrificed their lives in a testimony to the resurrected Jesus.
Modernist theory, serving as a basis of the fabrications dividing Christ into historical and non-historical, intentionally shifted the origin of gospels towards the end of the 2nd century. Why? Its goal was to cast doubts on the veracity of gospels and especially of the explicit testimony of the entire gospel that Jesus is true God and Saviour as it is clearly stated in the Gospel of John in particular. Only after the discovery of some papyrus scrolls, the heretics had to abandon their deceitful theories about the gospels.
Historical critics have also fabricated theories to challenge the gospel authors, especially the authorship of the letters of apostles Paul and John. They claim that the Apostle John wrote neither the gospel nor the letters. They invented lies about the Johannine gospel and Johannine and Pauline letters saying that they were written by someone else. They boycott even the testimony of Apostle John himself, who literally writes: “That which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched – this we proclaim.” (1Jn 1:1) Apostle Paul also testifies about writing of his letters in the following words: “See what large letters I use as I write to you with my own hand!” (Gal 6:11) “I, Paul, write this greeting in my own hand, which is the distinguishing mark in all my letters. This is how I write.” (2Thes 3:17) Pseudoscientific deceivers are not interested in the reality. It is boring to them. They need to be creative and are unbothered by the fact that they operate in a land of their dreams and pseudoscientific fabrications.
What can we briefly say about the authorship of the gospels? The gospels were written out of an urgent missionary need, in the days immediately following the sending of the Holy Spirit. At that time, 3,000 pilgrims from different parts of the Roman Empire were converted in one day.
The three main reasons why the gospels were written immediately after the sending of the Holy Spirit are:
1) It was necessary to lay a solid written foundation for mission, especially for mission in foreign territory. This was to ensure the unity of the proclamation of Christ’s teachings.
2) For reasons of authority, it was necessary for the gospel to be written by the apostles as eyewitnesses. They entrusted this task to the apostles John and Matthew. From the beginning, the gospels were copied and circulated in both Aramaic and Greek.
3) There was a need for sacred texts with the authority of the Scriptures for worship service. It was no longer enough for Christians to draw on the Old Testament. From the written testimony of the gospel came exegesis and instruction in Christian worship service on how to attain salvation through faith in Christ and also how to live according to Christ’s commandments.
The theory that the apostles first preached and then wrote the gospels suited the followers of contemporary modernism preached in all theological schools. As for the synoptists, the explanation is simple: Mark merely abridged the Gospel of Matthew, and Luke omitted something and added something.
Modernist heresies promote a purely human view of Scripture and of Jesus Christ. The transcendent plane is questioned or denied altogether.
The Vatican II declaration Nostra aetate opened the door to the antimission of paganism in the heart of the Church. Pseudo-pope Francis Bergoglio continues this antimission with his Amazon Synod, Pachamama demon enthronement, and self-dedication to Satan in Canada. In doing so, he can refer to the Second Vatican Council. The Council has so changed public sentiment and opinion in the Catholic Church that bishops, priests and believers have come to see this blatant apostasy as something quite normal. This spiritual blindness is the poisoned fruit of Vatican II.
John Paul II, in the spirit of the Second Vatican Council, organized a meeting in Assisi in 1986 with pagan religious leaders and prayed with them. But they do not recognize God as Father, they worship demons. With this gesture he expressed the heresy that Christianity and paganism are alternative paths to salvation.
The biggest shock today is that the pseudo-pope Bergoglio has introduced the principle of paradigm shift. On 1 November 2023, in the motu proprio Ad theologiam promovendam, he established that he can change the paradigms as he pleases, and at the same time declared that anything contrary to his decree is invalid. He is systematically destroying the fundamental pillars of the faith.
Subsequently, Bergoglio issued the so-called doctrinal declaration Fiducia supplicans, in which he legalized one of the gravest sins – sodomy, and even ordered to bless the unions of such people. With this sodomite anti-gospel, he abolished Catholic teaching and transformed the Catholic Church into a synagogue of Satan. He could only do this because of the change in thinking brought about by the spirit of Vatican II. This Council was wrongly given such authority, as if all the Councils before it had meant nothing. Under such spiritual terror, over a period of 60 years, conditions were created in which the pseudo-pope could already abolish the foundations of the Church and say that he was only implementing Vatican II.
This year marks the 1700th anniversary of the First Council of Nicaea. It is also the 60th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council. The Council of Nicaea condemned the heresy that questioned the divinity of Christ, and the heretic Arius himself. The Second Vatican Council, on the other hand, opened the door not only to the heresy of Arianism, but also to other heresies that questioned the divinity of Christ and the divine inspiration of Holy Scripture. Moreover, it also opened the door to the pagan invasion with the declaration Nostra aetate.
Bergoglio has legalized the sin of sodomy in Fiducia supplicans, thus denying sin as such. This undermines the entire Decalogue and the Christian creed. But then it is no longer Catholic doctrine or the Catholic Church! Bergoglio’s synodal way is an open rebellion against God and a radical rejection of Christ as the way of salvation. The Catholic who wants to be saved must separate himself from this false way and the sect that Bergoglio has founded, even if it masquerades as the Catholic Church. It is also necessary to call the Second Vatican Council heretical. As such it must be annulled. This Council radically contradicts the letter and spirit of the First Council of Nicaea.
May the celebration of the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea be the motive for the public annulment of the heretical Council under the name of “Vatican II”. Without these radical steps, there can be no true renewal of the Church.

+ Elijah
Patriarch of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate

+ Methodius OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
Secretary Bishops

11 March 2025