The Walrus has always been a Mong.

“Hawking's wasn't always in a wheelchair but the walrus has always been a mong.
It's only satire, don't be crying now Sea cow. Anyone else noticed how quiet it is when he ain't around but as soon as he is back the sad childish sings and abuse starts again. Who is the obsessed one. He claims everyone else is about it. Who can't leave things be. No wonder it had stalking and harassment orders, it can't leave nothing alone.”

Analysis the above statement by Danny West regarding Matt Taylor.

Danny West’s Latest Remarks: A Case of Projection?

In the ever-evolving world of online disputes, few names appear as frequently as Danny West’s when it comes to controversial remarks. His latest statement, aimed squarely at Matt Taylor, is a mix of insults, accusations, and deflection. But when you break it down, it raises an interesting question—who is really obsessed with whom?

West begins his tirade with a crude comparison, mocking someone’s physical condition while making a tasteless joke about Stephen Hawking. This brand of insult is often defended as "just satire," but the intent is clear: to demean and provoke. By adding, "Don’t be crying now, Sea cow," he attempts to preempt any backlash by framing his words as humour rather than outright abuse.

A key theme in West’s statement is his insistence that things are "quiet" when Matt Taylor is absent but become chaotic upon his return. The implication? That Matt is the catalyst for conflict. However, this assertion ignores an obvious contradiction: if Matt is the one obsessed, why is it West who continues to comment on his presence? If silence is truly golden, why not simply ignore him?

West further attempts to distance himself from any wrongdoing by flipping the narrative. "Who is the obsessed one?" he asks, painting Matt as the instigator while absolving himself of any role in the ongoing feud. This classic tactic—projection—shifts blame onto the other party while continuing the very behaviour he criticizes.

The statement concludes with a reference to alleged "stalking and harassment orders," implying that Matt Taylor has a documented history of trouble. Whether factual or not, this is a clear attempt to discredit Matt and reinforce the idea that he is incapable of moving on. However, considering that West himself remains fixated on Matt’s actions, one must wonder who is truly unable to "leave things alone."

Final Thoughts

Danny West’s statement, at its core, is an exercise in deflection. He insults, provokes, and then claims to be the victim of obsession—all while continuing to engage in the very behaviour he condemns. If Matt Taylor is truly as irrelevant as West implies, why does he feel the need to keep bringing him up? Perhaps, as is often the case in these online conflicts, the loudest voices belong to those who claim they want silence.