Premium Only Content

Debunking the “97% of scientists agree on climate change” myth | CERES Podcast Clips
In this clip from Episode 1 of the CERES Podcast, the CERES team leaders (Dr. Willie Soon, Dr. Ronan Connolly & Dr. Michael Connolly) take a deep dive into the origins of the claim that “97% of scientists agree on climate change”.
They show how and why the sausage of the “97% scientific consensus” claim was created. They then systematically go through the key studies that have claimed this and comprehensively demolish the claims.
They show the real “consensus” only is that 97% of scientists agree that “climate changes”. When you think about it, that’s actually a much less compelling or interesting claim – indeed, it’s something that the CERES team agrees with – the climate changes, and it always has. The CERES team have published multiple peer-reviewed papers on climate change (https://www.ceres-science.com/publications) – if there was no climate change, that would be a waste of time.
In terms of the trickier problem of figuring out what are the causes of these climate changes, the various surveys actually reveal that there is actually a lot of disagreement over how much is due to human activity vs. natural factors.
This is a fairly long clip because they go through in detail all the key “97%” studies. But, if you are wondering if the claim is true, or if somebody is insisting to you that it’s true, we recommend watching and sharing the full clip.
🔹 🔹 🔹 🔹
Chapters:
00:00 Where does the claim that “97% of scientists agree on climate change” come from?
06:06 The marketing value of a “95%, 96%, 97%” figure
09:03 The Oreskes (2004) and Doran & Zimmerman (2009) studies
12:32 What the surveys of scientists actually say: they just agree that climate changes, not on how much is human-caused vs. natural.
15:12 The Cook et al. (2013) study
19:37 The Lynas et al. (2021) study
28:19 Do we need to have a “scientific consensus”?
Link to the full podcast episode: https://rumble.com/v6q2d84-wildfires-to-weather-balloons-debunking-the-97-of-scientists-agree-myth-cer.html
-
17:45
CERES-Science
3 months agoEvaluating Climate Models and Observations: Q & A session (May 13, 2025, The Heritage Foundation)
1101 -
1:36:05
Side Scrollers Podcast
5 hours agoStreamer ATTACKS Men Then Cries Victim + Pronoun Rant Anniversary + More | Side Scrollers
33.2K -
12:06
Liberty Hangout
1 day agoDemocrat Woman Can't Define 'Woman'
49.6K79 -
LIVE
GritsGG
8 hours agoRumble Customs! 3515 Ws! 🫡!
363 watching -
38:39
Grant Stinchfield
6 hours ago $2.71 earnedHow Local TV News LOST Its Soul
39.4K4 -
2:09:51
Badlands Media
17 hours agoBadlands Daily: Sept. 1, 2025 – Trump vs. Big Pharma, Giuliani Crash, and Mortgage Fraud Fallout
76.4K51 -
1:12:35
theoriginalmarkz
7 hours agoCoffee with MarkZ. 09/01/2025
61.7K14 -
2:59:48
Wendy Bell Radio
12 hours agoSunday, Bloody Sunday
144K271 -
1:10:02
crgoodw1n
6 hours agoHAPPY LABOR DAY! Tactical shoosting W/ @BenderOdoyle Ask about !12hr !freshenup !discord
23.5K2 -
7:29:06
ENEMYOFDEATH2012
18 hours agoGod of War Playthrough Pt. 2 and some Fortnite
14.9K