Historically Illiterate Liar Jamie Raskin Goes Full Gun-Grabber Defining 'Well-Regulated Militia'

5 months ago
95

Posted • March 5, 2025: Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing about the eeeevvvvvvillll Republican plan to respect the Second Amendment rights of Americans and roll back unconstitutional gun laws. Rep. Jamie Raskin, who never fails to be wrong about everything, gave some remarks and -- true to form -- gets the Second Amendment totally wrong: Rep. Raskin: "The Supreme Court has been clear that the Second Amendment’s reference to a 'well-regulated militia' means well-regulated by the government." —— Of course, the 'well-regulated militia' clause does not mean that the government gets to restrict the use of or access to firearms. Raskin is either woefully ignorant, or a bald-faced liar. The SCOTUS settled the militia question back in 2008. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlNg4EyXwAAm6jv?format=png&name=900x900 —— William Paterson, Supreme Court justice, member of the Constitutional Convention, and signer of the U.S. Constitution, disagreed.

"What, indeed, is a militia but the people themselves prepared to act as soldiers for the purpose of resisting oppression and securing their rights." https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlNf9lmXoAAczkl?format=jpg&name=medium —— 'Well, what did he know about the Constitution?' - Jamie Raskin probably. Raskin is one of the bigger morons in Congress. And that’s saying something. That competition is STIFF. Like all Democrats, he'll just ignore the SCOTUS opinions he doesn't like. The Second Amendment is clear, and our rights shall not be infringed. Not by Raskin or anyone else. (…)

• More at: Twitchy - Historically Illiterate Liar Jamie Raskin Goes Full Gun-Grabber Defining 'Well-Regulated Militia'
https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2025/03/04/jamie-raskin-well-regulated-militia-means-gov-control-of-guns-n2409319

Loading comments...