Cicero on Oratory - LV LVI

Cicero on Oratory - LV LVI

In this discourse, Cicero emphasizes the essential relationship between law and oratory. He critiques the perception that one can excel in either field without the other, arguing that civil law is inherently significant and cannot be overshadowed by the embellishments of eloquence. Cicero points out that eloquence should enhance legal knowledge rather than detract from it, insisting that true oratory requires an understanding of legal principles.

Key Points:

The Importance of Eloquence in Law
Cicero discusses how eloquence enriches the understanding of civil law. He acknowledges a certain fear of losing the essence of legal knowledge while trying to embellish it with ornate language. Cicero believes that eloquence serves to showcase the significance of civil law.

Distinction Between Lawyer and Orator
Cicero argues that while lawyers can operate without eloquence, orators must have legal knowledge, defining a clear distinction where the mastery of each field is crucial yet interdependent. He suggests that one's ability as an orator is diminished without a foundation in law.

Cases of Legal Ignorance
The text reflects on examples of advocates who, despite lacking intricate legal knowledge, successfully argue significant cases. Cicero questions the reliance on eloquence in lieu of detailed legal understanding, presenting anecdotal evidence of cases where oratory might outshine legal expertise.

The Role of Legal Knowledge in Oratory
Cicero emphasizes that a firm background in law enhances a speaker's rhetorical prowess, particularly in legal debates. He addresses the tension between strict legal interpretations and the need for persuasive argumentation, ultimately arguing that effective advocacy may still rely heavily on eloquence.

Anecdote of Cicero and Galba
Cicero shares an anecdote involving the legal insights of two contemporaries, Cus and Galba, to illustrate the complexity and nuances of legal consultation. This example is used to demonstrate how eloquence can sometimes outweigh extensive legal knowledge in practical situations.