Premium Only Content

Post Procurement Fraud Prevents Rescission
Rescission in Michigan Requires Preprocurement Fraud
Post 4999
Lie About Where Vehicle Was Garaged After Policy Inception Not Basis for Rescission
This appeal turns on whether fraud occurred in relation to an April 26, 2018 renewal contract for a policy of insurance under the no-fault act issued by plaintiff, Encompass Indemnity Company ("Encompass").
In Samuel Tourkow, by David Tourkow v. Michael Thomas Fox, and Sweet Insurance Agency, formerly known as Verbiest Insurance Agency, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. Encompass Indemnity Company, et al, Nos. 367494, 367512, Court of Appeals of Michigan (February 12, 2025) resolved the claims.
The plaintiff, Encompass Indemnity Company, issued a no-fault insurance policy to Jon and Joyce Fox, with Michael Fox added as an additional insured. The dispute centers on whether fraud occurred in relation to the renewal of this policy on April 26, 2018.
Michael Fox was involved in an accident on December 26, 2018, which led to a lawsuit filed by David Tourkow on behalf of Samuel Tourkow. Encompass rescinded the policy, alleging material misrepresentations about the garaging location of Michael's vehicle. Michael then filed a third-party claim against Sweet Insurance Agency, alleging negligence.
The trial court initially granted summary disposition in favor of Encompass and Sweet, but this decision was appealed. The appellate court found that the trial court erred in its conclusions regarding preprocurement and postprocurement fraud and that Michael's due process rights were violated.
THE TRIAL COURT'S GRANT OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION IN FAVOR OF ENCOMPASS WAS ERRONEOUS
The Foxes argued the trial court erred by granting summary disposition in favor of Encompass and abused its discretion by declaring the April 26, 2018 renewal policy void ab initio.
The circumstances under which an insurer may invalidate an insurance contract based on fraud in Michigan now requires a court to separate fraud into two broad categories based on when it occurred:
fraud that occurred before the parties entered into an insurance contract (preprocurement fraud); and
fraud that occurred after the parties entered into an insurance contract (postprocurement fraud).
If fraud occurred before the parties entered into the insurance contract (preprocurement), then rescission is available as a remedy. If fraud occurred after the contract was signed, but before litigation began, then rescission is available as a remedy only if the fraud substantially breached the contract. Finally, if fraud occurred after litigation began-which necessarily also means that it occurred after the contract was signed- then rescission is not available as a remedy.
In sum, the trial court erred by granting summary disposition in favor of Encompass based on the trial court's erroneous conclusion that preprocurement fraud occurred in relation to the vehicle involved in the accident, a Ford F-150.
The Court of Appeals concluded that it follows that the trial court abused its discretion by holding the renewal policy was void ab initio on the basis of the alleged fraud. The decision in favor of Encompass was reversed.
The trial court erred by granting summary disposition in favor of Encompass.
ZALMA OPINION
Rescission is an equitable remedy based upon the concept of fairness. In most states a misrepresentation of a material fact, like where a vehicle is garaged, is grounds for rescission even if the misrepresentation was innocent or unintentional. In Michigan, however, the Court of Appeals explained that rescission requires evidence of fraud in the inception of the policy before the policy was issued. In this case, the fraud about the garaging of the vehicle happened after the policy was issued so there was no right to rescind in Michigan.
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe
Go to X @bzalma; Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg
-
8:02
Insurance Law
13 days agoContinuous Exposure to Breach of Contract Terms is an Occurrence
21 -
2:27:44
Side Scrollers Podcast
19 hours agoSilksong is “TRANS CODED” + YouTube GASLIGHTS Creators + Asmongold Stops Streaming | Side Scrollers
10.4K19 -
16:08
GritsGG
10 hours agoRank 1 Warzone Player VS Stream Snipers & a Cheater!
12K1 -
1:39:16
The HotSeat
14 hours ago👉 STOP Blaming Each Other — Look at the Media!
27.3K25 -
22:34
The Pascal Show
10 hours ago $1.78 earnedFEDERAL CHARGES?! Iryna Zarutska's Attacker Gets Hit With Federal Charges After Fatal Train Attack
12.1K13 -
LIVE
Lofi Girl
2 years agoSynthwave Radio 🌌 - beats to chill/game to
216 watching -
13:05
Mike Rowe
4 days agoIs College DEAD? Inside America’s #1 Trade School | Sheree Utash From #448 | The Way I Heard It
84.2K27 -
3:01:13
FreshandFit
7 hours agoAyesha Curry Never Wanted Steph Curry
69.9K12 -
23:28
DeVory Darkins
11 hours ago $12.60 earnedTrump official ANNIHILATES Democrats in heated debate as CNN gets caught sympathizing with criminals
30.2K74 -
1:02:26
The Nick DiPaolo Show Channel
13 hours agoPOC Murders Another White Woman | The Nick Di Paolo Show #1790
64K78