Del Bigtree: "Robert Kennedy Junior doesn't need to ...

6 months ago
294

Del Bigtree: "Robert Kennedy Junior doesn't need to eradicate any vaccine from the program. He just needs to show you how long the safety trial was. He just needs to make available to you and make sure that doctors give you true informed consent that these are known side effects, that we haven't done proper trials to know how long they would be. Had we done placebo trials, we would have answers to those things. How often are these things happening?"

"But remember, I just read 20 side effects of a list of about 60. And every single time, every injection, you are taking that risk of 60 different side effects for that one vaccine over and over and over again. 72 times and counting and growing, we are rolling the dice. If transverse myelitis is rare, and encephalitis is rare, and multiple sclerosis is rare, and thrombocytopenia is rare, and myocarditis is rare, and pericarditis is rare, how long before all those added together start moving out of the category of rare because they're all stacked on top of each other every time we do this? No one is trying to eradicate a vaccine program."

"What we're trying to do is say, we need to do studies. We have never looked at the entire vaccine program ever. We've never ever looked at those that got all 72 of their vaccines compared to those that got none. We asked the NIH to do that study, Robert Kennedy junior and I did, and a team of scientists. Why won't you do a retrospective study?"

"If a prospective study, meaning having a placebo group and denying them of your faith based religion that it is perfectly safe even before a trial, will you at least do a retrospective study of the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which has 10,000,000 people in it, tens of thousands of unvaccinated individuals, which the Institute of Medicine said is perfectly capable of doing a full, well powered study, comparative study between the unvaccinated and the vaccinated."

"Back in 02/2017, the NIH, Francis Collins and Tony Fauci said, we will never do that study. You're journalists. Your job like mine, like a detective, is to come up with motive. What would be the motive for the largest, most powerful scientific institution in the world, filled with the greatest scientific minds, to not do the most obvious comparative study."

"Do you think they haven't done it? Do you think they want me at this microphone today? Do you think they want Robert Kennedy Junior now the head of HHS because so many people now know the truth that you've never written about? Do you think they wanted to stop this? Do you think they don't realize if they'd had done a comparative study between the vaccinated individuals and the unvaccinated individuals and prove to the world that the vaccinated have less cancer, less ADD, ADHD, less lupus, less asthma, less autism."

"Don't you think you would have been printing that at the headline of every one of your newspapers? Don't you think they've run that study so that they could end this conversation forever? Come on. Where is your common sense? Where is your common duty as journalists to tell the world the truth?"

Loading comments...