EXCUSES BACKFIRE As Calls For Starmer To Quit ERUPT!

Right, so the brutal attack on a dance class in Southport back in July of last year, reached it’s culmination this week with the conviction of Axel Rudakubana, who pleaded guilty yesterday to instigating a course of events that appalled a nation. The guilty plea will come as small comfort to the families of those affected, the grief will still be raw, the anger that this was allowed to happen when Rudakubana was known to various services and agencies will no doubt drive wider anger in Southport on top of the grief and shock that community will naturally still be feeling and that is completely justified with massive questions now being asked of the Starmer government.
For as much as events like this should not be politicised however, that is unfortunately what Keir Starmer has done. Following an initial comment on Monday following that guilty plea, Starmer decided to take to the podium in Downing Street today to pontificate to the nation about it. His initial reaction last July was markedly unwelcome in Southport, his intervention today has made matters even worse with widespread calls for his resignation once again being made. As sure as night follows day, it seems Keir Starmer will cause offence, but he’s really done it this time.
Right, so a guilty plea has been entered by the 18 year old Axel Rudakubana for the killing of three little girls in a Southport dance class, a Taylor Swift themed party as it was. A community was wrecked by such a display of abject and depraved violence in their midst as any community would be, an entire nation was up in arms and sadly some had to take such matters into their own hands as misleading information at the time about the identity of the perpetrator quickly spread across social media.
Where such disgusting individuals quickly made out that the attacker was a Muslim who arrived by small boat as an asylum seeker in 2023, it soon emerged that this was absolute nonsense it was made up, only far right sociopaths would dream of inventing such a story and furthermore share it around, propagating the lies, especially when the likes of Laurence Fox and Andrew Tate were amongst them – big accounts causing a lot of damage and harm as they did. Announcing the identity of the guy, made up as that was, despite retaining the information that they were only 17 at the time should have been a red flag, since anyone accused of a crime under the age of 18 in this country has their identity kept confidential, but I suppose when you’re in the likes of the English Defence League, who were accused of being behind all the damage caused there, especially the attack on a hotel nearby housing asylum seekers, the genuine article now having had a target painted on them by petty racists, whilst also throwing bricks and torching ambulances in the wake of a vigil held for the deceased, truly patriotic actions, not. They fulfilled their racist aims, all off the back of grieving families and a community turned upside down.
Exceptions where it comes to naming guilty parties can be made though and it soon emerged that the perpetrator was Axel Rudakubana, who was not an asylum seeker, is not Muslim either, but is in fact Christian and was born in South Wales and is of Rwandan descent, Rwanda incidentally being a country where some 93% of the populace is Christian just an fyi for the knuckle draggers out there.
Keir Starmer’s name is already mud in Southport though. In the wake of the attack, he showed up to pay his respects and lay a wreath, it’s what politicians do isn’t it? He wasn’t exactly welcome though, heckled as he was, wouldn’t speak to anybody, and given his own rhetoric concerning asylum seekers and migrants, deservedly so at that by those wishing to hold him accountable for that reason. He was asked what he’d do, was jeered for making a photo op out of the tragedy, he didn’t address people’s concerns, he just walked away. And now he’s at it again.
Shameless as he is through and through he announced a big speech on the matter which was held this morning to little fanfare, where he’s managed to push the buttons of a nation all over again.
Following a display of gushing sympathy and sorry, naming the three little girls as he did so, something he couldn’t do to the faces of angry and grief stricken Southport residents back in July of last year, he announced there were difficult questions to answer and that the inquiry launched into the failures that allowed Axel Rudakubana to do what he did. Ah so you can launch an inquiry into the events which led to three children being murdered, but when it comes to a national inquiry on safeguarding of children from the other week, you couldn’t do that? I mean sure as I said at the time enough enquiries have been done already into such matters, you could always just act on the recommendations of the last one instead of just wasting more public cash on another, but here there’s public cash to spend it seems. How about the cash lost to the organisations and agencies which are going to be the reason at least in part of this failure?
How about he Prevent program for one? It’s a racist endeavour in and of itself, it is top down diktat from the government supposedly to keep the country safe, but has too much of an obsession with Muslim communities, the effect it has had on communities is to divide them by religious segregation as well as gender segregation and in 2 decades of being around, a Blairite failure as it is, it has failed to keep the country safe, it has failed to stop people being radicalised in communities, it has suppressed names, it has become synonymous with a modern day interpretation of the new blacks, no Irish, nor dogs mentality and as Film maker and Samosa Media Co-Founder Anwar Akhtar has said in light fo a film he had made on the Prevent Programme:
‘Racism in Britain has been given a green light to re-circuit itself and converging on Muslims, it’s OK to hate Muslims, everyone can join in the Muslim hating bandwagon and some of it is linked to the Prevent Programme.’
Those overseeing the program are not unbiased themselves and therefore when you consider that Rudakubana had been referred to Prevent three times in his early teens, when he was 13 and 14 years of age, that failure of Prevent is absolute, but it’s a Labour right devoted to program, so will any questions be asked of them, because they need to be?
Besides Prevent, Rudakubana had contact with the police, the youth justice system, social services, mental health services, all had failed it is said in the media, to identify the danger he posed to society, but given the services aside from Prevent he was involved with, this is also a sign of the failure of our community support systems. What were his youth issues? His mental health issues? Evidently he had them if he was known to these agencies, why were they not able to help them and then you consider he was going through this, early teens, middle of the Tory administration, austerity, cuts, anyone who’s tried to engage with any community service these days knows they are not what they were and it is the lack of funding and support that leads us here and as much as I will not excuse what Rudakubana did, I won’t excuse failures of those services, which have been run into the ground which may have led to led to his later actions? Government policy is almost certainly to blame as well and honestly if you just consider these issues, it’s common sense isn’t it? It’s obvious that cuts to services don’t improve them and we’ve had years of it and nothing Starmer is doing is changing that here, with his inquiry.
Starmer’s speech was an attempt fundamentally to talk up the need for justice and accountability. To cheer the guilty plea and demand answers for why this happened, but the trouble is, Keir Starmer exemplifies these failures.
He now claims that this could be a new form of terrorist attack, when the evidence on the face of it, is one of failure by those same underfunded services, though where he mentions Prevent, he doesn’t mention failing social care. This is not in any way excusing Rudakubana’s actions but it has to be considered a factor leading up to them and if Starmer is going to play the terrorist card, then these agencies need financial restoration and support to get them back on their feet. Where an apparent £600m is going into social care according to Reeves budget, that and then some is lost through tax and national insurance hikes because so many social care providers are privatised interests, so it’s all very well Starmer talking this up, but back it with the cash injections that will actually make a difference.
When talking of terrorist groups, Starmer brought up Al Qaeda, now actually running the government in Syria as they are, under the guise of HTS, which have British support. Make your mind Starmer, are you with them or against them?
There was the blaming of access to dangerous materials online and then there was the talk of changing the law and review counter extremism and we reach the crux of the matter, which is that this inquiry is going to be used as a blunt tool of censorship. He shut down blame on himself, which is unsurprising, because nothing is ever his fault and he never, ever says sorry. He praised the work of the Crown Prosecution Service, but at the time he was working there, he talks of an era of renewal, but what is functionally changing to help people as opposed to just clamping down on them and people watching the speech, well, they certainly picked up on it and if he was truly serious about this, he might have mention of a certain salute made by Elon Musk after Trump’s inauguration yesterday, to chicken to have a pop back at a guy who has threatened to throw as much money as it talks at the UK political system to bring you down Keith? Well perhaps he’s realised he needn’t spend a penny to do that.
The comments in response to Starmer’s speech have a running theme. People clearly feel lied to, that there was a cover up by Starmer and that he needs to go, that so many appear to be from the far right implies a certain fear that he might be coming for them, and frankly good on that score, you’ve got it coming, but it’s the other freedoms he looks set on curtailing that are eliciting just as many complaints, fear of more censorship, more control freakery, all things Starmer has become known for.
There are legitimate issues to address here, the legacy of these little girls should be that it never happens again, by ensuring no more victims and no more failures in the care system. If you’re going to name them Starmer, you should make sure of that, but we all know you won’t. You’ll use this for your own advantage, you’ll use this to launch a culture war to clamp down on freedom of speech and freedom of expression, I have no doubt your inquiry will highlight these as failings, an inquiry you’re launching because you were too craven and cowardly to launch one over child grooming, or indeed act upon the findings of any previous inquiry and I have no doubt that on those recommendations found this time to curtail our rights though, you’ll act on those in a heartbeat. We know what your version of dealing with issues is and that is to crush dissent. You’ve done it in your own party, now even your own MPs aren’t safe from being called in for questioning under police caution for taking part in a peace march and laying flowers as happened following the Gaza march in London on Saturday. Get all the details of the fallout from that for Starmer in this video recommendation here as your suggested next watch. Please do also hit like, share and subscribe to the channel so as to ensure you don’t miss out on new daily content and make sure you don’t miss out on new content dropping daily and I’ll hopefully catch you on the next vid. Cheers folks.