SICKO Starmer’s Benefits Slashing Exposes A MONSTER!

Right, so Keir Starmer has just given what is possibly his most bonkers and completely immoral interview to what passes as a British newspaper, but which most of us wouldn’t line a litter tray with lest it poison the cat, The S*n, which shall hereafter be referred to by it’s more accurate moniker of the Scum, because only pond life would choose to associate themselves with the evil Murdoch rag, but Starmer of course as we know absolutely loves kissing up to creepy Uncle Rupert.
Starmer talks of having the big balls necessary to slash benefits, of loving a fight and having had to fight to get where he is today, and of course this hate rag laps it up, but it’d be a shame to expose not only his lies and the fact that only a completely incompetent and impotent weakling that is hung like a gerbil would actually claim it requires big balls to slash benefits, slash the support to the poorest and lowest earners rather than take on the rich and powerful. Starmer has chosen the way of the weakling, not one of strength. He hasn’t got fight in him, he’s hiding from it and actually his big balls have got more of a kicking this week than an appraisal and all of it self inflicted and deserved at that.
Right, so to describe what Keir Starmer has been coughing up into the public domain by way of claims, allow me to invoke a comparison from the far more credible news source than The Scum, by which I mean Viz Comics, because where Keir Starmer has opined to said Murdoch hate rag and their supposed journalist Harry Cole, in a manner where he has basically described himself as Buster Gonad, what he’s actually delivered is more in line with something Roger Mellie the man on the telly might say.
Yes, he’s done another interview for the Murdoch Scum, they can’t get rid of him from Murdoch Towers it seems and still he’s there, sniffing around looking for an opportunity to talk to people who hate him if they read this rag, still hasn’t dawned on him I don’t think, but equally hate benefit claimants too, workshy shirkers who want something for nothing who could buy a house if they gave up drinking coffee and who have to lift their arms up ever time they step up the curb lest they bruise their knuckles.
Well, I’ve donned sunglasses, for you should never look directly at The S*n and in a piece titled ‘FIGHTING WORDS I’ve got the balls to take an axe to Britain’s benefits bill – we’ll be RUTHLESS with cuts if needed, vows Keir Starmer’ let the bragging begin.
Starmer is under the impression you need big balls to take on the benefit bill, that somehow it takes guts and courage to punch down on those less fortunate, that he a multimillionaire is doing what is justified and righteous, but politically speaking this is the easiest job in the world, to attack those who don’t fund you, those you look down on as less productive, those who are in receipt of top ups to already low wages and attacks on the long term sick and disabled which implies they are somehow worth less than others are. The benefits bill is what it is, it is symptomatic of the fact that work doesn’t pay and you have an entire generation now who work but can barely make ends meet, let alone fulfil the dream of owning a home or starting a family, who no longer view work as the way to get that, because they’re already working two or three jobs and getting no work life balance and no joy out of life around that because they still can’t afford to, therefore increasingly the social contract regarding work is broken, is eroding faster than ever and instead of answering that fundamental and necessary question, instead of building solutions to that, instead of ensuring work does pay, not just so you can by, but you can actually live, Starmer talks instead of attacking their meagre income again.
With regards to disability benefits, there has already been talk of seizing billions, changing the rules of claiming Personal Independence Payment ensuring more people get thrown off it, despite that enabling people to get to work if they are disabled, thereby making this a discriminatory move, but again missing the point of why these people have such health issues, many of them mental health issues and it’s all tied to the social contract being broken.
Of course I’m not the only person pointing all of this out, because Keir Starmer has also stated he loves to have a fight, despite not having the wherewithal to punch his way out of a wet paper bag and we know this, because he’s shown us:
Yes, well that speaks for itself doesn’t it! But equally it is left wing, or what few left wingers in the party under Starmer’s authoritarianism that have also pointed out the flaws in Starmer and Rachel from accounts Tory cuts thinking and this was obviously egged on by the odious Cole who according to the piece asked Starmer if he had the stomach or the balls to take on these rotten lefties, those who have been squeamish about cuts for years, to which Starmer said, yes, I love fights, I had to fight to get the leadership of the Labour Party and I had to fight to win the election.
Well having seen how Starmer fights, we know that’s a lie, but also because he never had to fight to become Labour leader or win the General Election, he lied each time there too. He promised Labour members he was continuity Corbyn, that the 2019 manifesto for change was a blueprint, but it all got dumped and once he became Labour leader, backed by the Israel Lobby, he set about proving he was anything but Corbyn instead, purging vast swathes of the membership or driving them to leave instead as he proved to be the total opposite. Where the mainstream media gave him years of cover over that and avoided criticising him the more unpopular the Tories became, he became the establishments choice, the next one they had decided in our sham of a democracy to make PM and he continues to serve those interests, winning the anyone but the Tories vote. Now he’s come under proper scrutiny everyone hates him. The left for not being what he said he’d be, the right for being seen as a lefty even though he absolutely isn’t and everyone else plus all of the above for being a rampant liar, his manifesto shredded and his leadership and competence highly questionable, the most hated PM in history in the first 100 days in office and his numbers are still plunging.
But lets get some positive news in here, because whilst Starmer acts like Billy Big Balls over benefit cuts when the reality is more Tinky Winky, Labour have just lost in court over their plans to cut any of it!
In news that came out just two days ago, the High Court has found Labour’s consultation to slash billions from benefits to be unlawful.
The case was brought by disability activist Ellen Clifford, an excerpt from the Big Issue’s coverage reading:
‘In a judgment published this morning (16 January), Mr Justice Calver said that the judicial review, brought by disability activist Ellen Clifford, had “surmounted the substantial hurdle of establishing that the consultation was so unfair as to be unlawful”.
Repeatedly describing the DWP consultation in autumn 2023 as “misleading”, “rushed” and “unfair”, he said:
• The consultation documents failed to highlight the “substantial” loss of benefits facing those affected by the proposals.
• The consultation gave the “misleading impression” that changes were required to ensure deaf and disabled people could access employment support, when they could already choose to access this voluntarily.
• Despite the consultation presenting the changes as being solely about helping disabled people into work, in reality “costs savings was at least one of the two bases, if not the central basis, on which decisions would be taken on which policies would be taken forward by the government”.
• The eight-week consultation was unlawfully short in the circumstances.’
8 weeks to make decisions that would be life or death to thousands, average loss of income would be more than £400 a month for the disabled in particular and with 100,000 disabled people considered highly vulnerable, there was no mitigation for their particular vulnerability and I’m not going to use that word further having been told off in the past by Ellen Clifford herself for it, but what this court case has shone a light on is nothing has been learned by Starmer, Reeves, DWP boss Liz Kendall or her team from the DWP deaths caused by the Tories, instead a desire to continue with what they did before seemingly and Starmer talks of having the big balls needed to do this. Does he have the same fight in him in court or is it only reserved for the poorest, his own actually left wing MPs? Well, we’ve seen what fight he’s got in him already, the punchbag won. Starmer hasn’t got big balls, he’s a no balls, a man with shocking delusions of adequacy, supposedly a toolmakers son which to some people makes him a tool himself, but he can’t be, because he’s of no use to anyone, certainly not to those on low incomes and the disabled. He is in fact the human equivalent of a participation award, no thanks for coming, no thanks for trying, go home, I hope you step on a lego when you get there.
Congratulations to Ellen Clifford on her win a lot of disabled people and their carers owe you a debt of gratitude for this. For more on Labour’s plans to slash billions from the disabled, they can still go to the Supreme Court from here I suppose if they really are determined to keep trying to punch down, rather than bring in an overnight wealth tax and fix all this nonsense immediately, do check out this video recommendation here as your suggested next watch, please do hit like, share and subscribe to the channel to make sure you don’t miss out on new content dropping daily as well as supporting the channel which is very much appreciated and I will hopefully catch you on the next vid. Cheers folks.