‘They’re Trying to Wipe Us Off the Map.’ We Are Nearing Extinction

‘They’re Trying to Wipe Us Off the Map.’ We Are Nearing Extinction

Show more

FAO: its origin, formation and evolution 1945-1981
https://www.fao.org/4/p4228e/p4228e.pdf

Think-and-Grow-Rich-Napoleon-Hill-1937-original-version-1937
https://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/lonestar/r/files/static/v13Y/Think-And-Grow-Rich_2011-06.pdf

Today I want to talk about self sufficient and many are confused on what this actually means

What People need to realize you MUST be able to reduce your consumer ideology that has been rammed down your thought since you were introduced into the public indoctrination -
Many are forced to have 2 jobs to cover their never ending cost of living just to get another job as inflation and cost rise

Millions of men and women realize Having your own home for millions now h

What are the biggest expenses –
A. A home
B. Food
C. utilities

Now consider these option, if you gorw a garden, raise chickens or other sources of protein using your land – you will save thousand per year on food cost – these are facts.
Proper root cellar to store produce and Refrigeration will save you thousands of years in hydro costs
Building a greenhouse that is attached to your home also gives you fresh produce all year round in the northern climate –

To actually look at the numbers of these of grip preppers’ show – most are just grafter sight selling you their propaganda

I was a hunter, fisherman and a gather all my life. Spent most of my free time in Nature – in the mountains in the east kootenay’s of BC.
My home was not living in the old west, It was modern, Running water hot water, wood stove cooking stove,
But what made my home great was I grew our own food, Raised Pigs, cows, chickens, turkey and Ducks. Also I hunted Elk, Moose, White Tail, and Mule Deer for Meat,
These were added values where I did not have to pay my wages to buy food.
Now let’s explain this in layman terms

I produced as much of the basic food group, potatoes, tomatoes, onions, carrots turnips, Cabbage, Beats, ect . So these are basically my main crops,

I planted apple, pear, nectarine, peach, cherry trees every year,

So I grew a self sufficient food to live very comfortable.

But what made this work was my neighbors’ who also were on the same page.
I still had to buy oranges, pine apples coconuts as these were no typical vegetation in my area.

So the term self-sufficient is used as you live off the land, with no comforts.

This is the propaganda that MUST be corrected

We need to educate what self sufficient and purpose really is,

It is reducing your cost on consumer items that you may do yourself with working the land.

Best thing is not everyone specializes in everything So trade, barter comes into the scenario.

Its 2025 how we have come so far with technology.

Thermal heat for all year growing in greenhouses, alternate sources for power or hydro make this very easy.

Better wood stoves, more efficient.

The globalization or the power to be wants you reliant on them. In return you are enslaved in living. So you’re NOT living your surviving.

They formed a welfare state, and somehow they became the decision makers without your consent.

They knew exactly what to do

They used there brainwashing tools of radio, new, television, internet to slowly erode the family unit in stealth.

They removed the farmers, growers and turn the land into corporation, where you were forced to buy from them at the cost of safety, security

How farmers and everyone are affected by Globalisation?
The Corporation have benefited from enhanced access to international markets and modern technology, while others have experienced negative consequences such as the abandonment of traditional farming methods and the loss of their land and means of living due to these advancements.

2. It can facilitate the spread of sickness from animals to humans.
While their genetic diversity provides animals with natural disease resistance, intensive livestock farming can produce genetic similarities within flocks and herds.
This makes them more susceptible to pathogens and, when they are kept in close can then spread easily among them. Intensive livestock farming can effectively serve as a bridge for pathogens, allowing them to be passed from wild animals to farm animals and then to men and women.

10 things you should know about industrial farming
Problem – Reaction Solution – lets dive into this Industrial Farming Corporation Plan – UN Agenda 21
Industrial farming was created by the United Nation
The World Food Programme (WFP) is an international organization within the United Nations

Who runs the World food Program?

Cindy McCain is the Executive Director of the World Food Programme (WFP). She has controlled the direction for four decades.

Where is the headquarters of the Food and Agriculture Organization?
Rome Italy

The founding of FAO

There were three major steps in the founding of FAO: (i) the holding of the United Nations Conference on Food and Agriculture, at Hot Springs, Virginia; (ii) the setting up of a United Nations Interim Commission on Food and
Agriculture to make the necessary preparations for FAO's formal establishment; and (iii) the holding in Quebec of the First Session of the FAO Conference, at which the process of formation of the Organization was completed.

The Hot Springs Conference

As has already been indicated, a United Nations Conference on Food and Agriculture was called on the initiative of United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt at the Homestead Hotel, Hot Springs, Virginia, from 18 May to 3 June 1943. Representatives of 44 nations participated and signed the Final Act:

AUSTRALIA ETHIOPIA NEW ZEALAND
BELGIUM FRANCE NICARAGUA
BOLIVIA GREAT BRITAIN NORWAY
BRAZIL GREECE PANAMA
CANADA GUATEMALA PARAGUAY
CHILE HAITI PERU
CHINA HONDURAS PHILIPPINES
COLOMBIA ICELAND POLAND
COSTA RICA INDIA UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA
CUBA IRAN UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST
CZECHOSLOVAKIA IRAQ REPUBLICS
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC LIBERIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ECUADOR LLTXEMBOURG URUGUAY
EGYPT MEXICO VENEZUELA
EL SALVADOR NETHERLANDS YUGOSLAVIA

In addition, an official of DENMARK was present in a personal capacity.

The Conference was held while World War H had still not ended, and security
was tight. The term "United Nations" in the title of the Conference referred to the nations that were working together in the effort to win that war. These points are reflected in the opening sentence of the Declaration the Conference adopted:

From their logo it says FIAT PANIS!

What does the Latin word fiat mean?
You might think a fiat is just an Italian car, but it actually means a legal, authoritative decision that has absolute sanction. From the Latin for "let it be done," the word fiat is a binding edict issued by a person in command.

PANIS means bread in Latin

I will attached URL Website to download the PDF’s for your own personal research

https://www.fao.org/4/p4228e/p4228e.pdf
So if you have researched and comprehend who is behind Globalization this is jst more evidence how they conspired to enslave all the men and women.

Using their De-facto governments-backed intensive agriculture, also known as factory farming, has become a dominant force in the last five decades.

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations leading international efforts to defeat hunger

There stealth and propaganda the globalists who own the UN and all their franchises are all involved and complicit.
They use their skill make their plans like they’re going to benefit society but in fact they have an alternate agenda

Media, schoooooled , book, and regurgitated manipulation used?
In practice, media manipulation tactics may include the use of the use of rhetorical strategies including logical fallacies, deceptive content like disinformation, and propaganda techniques, and often involve the suppression of information
They used the Industrial Agriculture as the REACTION for a fast-growing world. Synthetic fertilizers, chemical pesticides and high-yield cereal hybrids promised to reduce hunger, accommodate growing populations and stimulate economic prosperity. Between 1960 and 2015, agricultural production more than tripled, resulting in an abundance of low-cost fare and averting global food shortages.

But not everything went as anticipated. Decades of industrial farming have taken a heavy toll on the environment and raised some serious concerns about the future of food production. “Efficient farming is not just a matter of production

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Programme Manager.
“It is also about environmental sustainability, public health and economic inclusivity.”

1 Externalized costs, such as the funds required to purify contaminated drinking water or to treat diseases related to poor nutrition, are also unaccounted for by the industry, meaning that communities and taxpayers are picking up the tab without even realizing it.

2. It fosters antimicrobial resistance.
In addition to preventing and treating disease, antimicrobials are commonly used to accelerate livestock growth. Over time, microorganisms develop resistance, making antimicrobials less effective as medicine. In fact, about 700,000 people die of resistant infections every year.
These diseases may cause more deaths than their Poison they created called cancer.

Their own documentation quotes this
According to the World Health Organization, antimicrobial resistance “threatens the achievements of modern medicine” and may precipitate “a post-antibiotic era, in which common infections and minor injuries can kill.”
3. Its use of pesticides may have adverse health effects.
Large volumes of chemical fertilizers and pesticides are used to increase agricultural yields and humans may be exposed to these potentially-toxic pesticides through the food they consume, resulting in adverse health effects.

Some pesticides have been proven to act as endocrine disruptors, potentially affecting reproductive functions, increasing the incidence of breast cancer, causing abnormal growth patterns and developmental delays in children, and altering immune function.

4. It contaminates water and soil and affects human health.
Agriculture plays a major role in pollution, releasing large volumes of manure, chemicals, antibiotics, and growth hormones into water sources. This poses risks to both aquatic ecosystems and human health. In fact, agriculture’s most common chemical contaminant, nitrate, can cause “blue baby syndrome”, which can lead to death in infants.

5. It has caused epidemics of obesity and chronic disease.
Industrial agriculture produces mainly commodity crops, which are then used in a wide variety of inexpensive, calorie-dense and widely available foods. Consequently, 60 per cent of all dietary energy is derived from just three cereal crops–rice, maize and wheat.

Although it has effectively lowered the proportion of people suffering from hunger, this calorie-based approach fails to meet nutritional recommendations, such as those for the consumption of fruits, vegetables and pulses. The popularity of processed, packaged and prepared foods has increased in almost all communities.

Obesity is also on the rise globally and many suffer from preventable diseases often related to diets, like heart disease, stroke, diabetes and some cancers.

6. It is an inefficient use of land.
In spite of an insufficient global supply of pulses, fruits and vegetables, livestock farming is ever more ubiquitous, perpetuating a self-sustaining cycle of supply and demand.
Between 1970 and 2011, livestock increased from 7.3 billion to 24.2 billion units, worldwide, with about 60 per cent of all agricultural land used for grazing. Agriculture has become less about producing food and more about generating animal feed, biofuels and industrial ingredients for processed food products.

Meanwhile, while there may be fewer people in the world who are undernourished, there are many more people who are now malnourished.

7. It entrenches inequality.
Although small farms make up 72 per cent of all farms, they occupy just 8 per cent of all agricultural land.
In contrast, large farms–which account for only 1 per cent of the world’s farms–occupy 65 per cent of agricultural land. This gives large farms disproportionate control, and there is little incentive to develop technologies that could benefit resource-poor small-hold farmers, including those in developing countries.

At the other end of the food supply chain, food that is affordable to the poor may be energy-dense but is invariably nutrient-poor.

Micronutrient deficiencies may impair cognitive development, lower resistance to disease, increase risks during childbirth and, ultimately, affect economic productivity.
The poor are effectively disadvantaged both as producers and consumers.

9. It is fundamentally at odds with environmental health.
In the early 20th century, the Haber-Bosch process–which would transform modern agriculture–used very high temperatures and pressure to extract nitrogen from the air, combine it with hydrogen, and produce ammonia, which is now the basis of the chemical fertilizer industry.

That effectively rendered nature’s own fertilization process (sun, healthy micro-biotic soils, crop rotation) obsolete.
Today, ammonia production consumes 1-2 per cent of the world’s total energy supply accounts for about 1.5 per cent of total global carbon dioxide emissions.

The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) supports a transition toward global food systems that provide net positive impacts on nutrition, the environment and farmer livelihoods.

Contributing to the One Planet Network Sustainable Food Systems Programme. UNEP has led the development of a guideline for collaborative policymaking and improved governance.

‘They’re Trying to Wipe Us Off the Map.’ Small Farmers Are Nearing Extinction

The family farm between the urban centers where most of us live.

But it has been declining for generations, and the closing days of small farms pummeled from every side: a trade war, severe weather associated with climate change fraud, tanking commodity prices related to globalization, political polarization, and corporate farming defined not by a silo and a red barn but technology and the efficiencies of scale.
__________________________________________

It is the worst crisis in decades. Farm bankruptcies were up 12 percent in the Midwest from July of 2018 to June of 2019; they’re up 50 percent in the Northwest. Tens of thousands have simply stopped farming, knowing that reorganization through bankruptcy won’t save them. The nation lost more than 100,000 farms between 2011 and 2018; 12,000 of those between 2017 and 2018 alone.

The Farm debt, at $416 billion, is at an all-time high. More than half of all farmers have lost money every year since since 2013, and lost more than $1,644 this year. Farm loan delinquencies are rising.
Suicides in farm communities are happening with alarming frequency.

Farmers aren’t the only workers in the American economy being displaced by technology, but when they lose their jobs, they also ejected from their homes and the land that’s been in their family for generations.

“It hits you so hard when you feel like you’re the one who is losing the legacy that your great-grandparents started,”

depression
suicide last
.
Farmers have always talked of looming disaster, but the duration and severity of the current crisis suggests an alarming and once unthinkable possibility — that independent farming is no longer a viable livelihood.

Small farms, defined as those bringing in less than $350,000 a year before expenses, accounted for just a quarter of food production in 2017, down from nearly half in 1991.

In the dairy industry, small farms accounted for just 10 percent of production.
The disappearance of the small farm would further hasten the decline of rural land in north America , which has been struggling to maintain an economic base for decades.

“Farm and ranch families are facing a great extinction,”

. “If we lose that rural lifestyle, we have really lost a big part of what made this country great.”

A perfect storm of factors has led to the recent crisis in the farm industry. After boom years in the beginning of the 21st century, prices for commodities like corn, soybeans, milk, and meat started falling in 2013.
The reason for these lowered prices are the twin forces upending much of the economy: technology and globalization.

Technology has made farms more efficient than ever before. But economies of scale meant that most of the benefits accrued to corporate farmers, who built up huge holdings as smaller farmers sold out.

Even as four million farms disappeared in the North America between 1948 and 2015, total farm output more than doubled.

Globalization brought more farmers into the international market for crops, flooding the market with soybeans and corn and cattle and milk, and with increased supply comes lower prices.

Global food production has increased 30 percent over the last decade, according to John Newton, the chief economist of the American Farm Bureau.

If that’s a good thing for feeding the planet, it also reduces what comes back to producers, whose costs don’t fall with prices.

President Trump’s trade war hasn’t helped matters. After the United States slapped tariffs on Chinese goods including steel and aluminum last year, China retaliated with 25 percent tariffs on agricultural imports from the U.S.. China then turned to other countries such as Brazil to replace American soybeans and corn. “This was a market that took years to develop,”

Trump “The CEO of the Corporation of the US – they call president has worked very hard to make our markets unstable.”

Agricultural exports between January and August this year were down 5 percent, or $5.6 billion dollars, from the same period last year. The Trump administration has made $16 billion in aid available to farmers affected by the trade war, though small farmers complain the bulk of the money has gone to huge producers with large crop losses.
Around 40 percent of the $88 billion in farm income expected this year is going to come in the form of federal aid and insurance, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation. Farm income absent that assistance, at $55 billion, is down 14 percent since last year and is half of what it was in 2013.
Smaller farms have found it especially hard to adapt to these changes, which they blame on government policy and a lack of antitrust enforcement.

The government is on the side of big farms, they say, and is ambivalent about whether small farms can succeed. “Get big or get out,”

Nixon’s secretary of agriculture, infamously told farmers in the 1970s. It’s a sentiment that Sonny Perdue, the agriculture secretary under President Trump, echoed recently.

In north America, the big get bigger and the small go out,” Perdue said, at the World Dairy Expo in Wisconsin in October.
The number of farms with more than 2,000 acres nearly doubled between 1987 and 2012, according to USDA data. The number of farms with 200 to 999 acres fell over that time period by 44 percent.

Many small farmers are routinely selling their crops for less than it costs to produce them. “It’s very intimidating, you work hard every day, and every day, it seems like you’re just always struggling,”

Prices are so low that farmers are trying to figure out other ways to come up with the money to keep their farm going.
But like many other rural areas around North America, the smaller township are being exterminated,

You hear stories of 80 year old men delivering newspapers;

GoFundMe accounts popping up everywhere
.
Farmers are having mental health problems because of their farm’s finances.

Farmer considering suicide —
Rural North America has been shrinking for decades, and the orchestrated Globalists created the Great Recession accelerated that contraction as rural manufacturing jobs disappeared and people moved to cities and suburbs seeking work.

That is indeed where the jobs are. Between 2008 and 2017, metropolitan areas that included central cities of at least 50,000 people accounted for 99 percent of all job and population growth, according to data crunched by David Swenson, an economist at Iowa State University. In the Midwest, 81 percent of rural counties saw population declines between 2008 and 2017, and in the Northeast, 85 percent of rural counties shrank over that time period.

So have the institutions that make a community. Around 4,400 schools in rural districts closed between 2011 and 2015, the most recent year for which there is data available, according to the National Center for Education Statistics; suburban districts, by contrast, added roughly 4,000 schools over that same time period. In Wisconsin’s dairy country alone, the Antigo School District, in north central Wisconsin, closed three elementary schools this year, and 44 schools have closed since 2018.

“I used to have a lot of neighbors, now I have almost no neighbors,” says George Naylor, an Iowa corn and soybean farmer who is trying to transition to organic farming to stay afloat.

Cochran is worried about the future of her rural Pennsylvania community as more farmers give up. Two neighbor farm auctions are scheduled soon. The dairy refrigeration supply business where she buys equipment is on the verge of collapse. Young people, seeing economic despair all around them, get out as quickly as they can. “I see this as a wholesale removal — or extermination — of our rural class,”

There’s nothing on the horizon to turn around these rural areas.

People are being forced into the 15 minute prisons called cities {are increasingly concentrating in a few metropolitan areas — by 2040, 70 percent of Americans will live in 15 states.
Canada Corporation is just a franchise and same agenda proceeds

The regions surrounding family farms are the next ghost towns.
“We have to think about what we really want rural North America to look like,”
“Do we want it to be abandoned small towns and farmers who can’t make a living, and a lot of really big farms that are polluting the groundwater?”

(Large farms, which have more animal waste to deal with because of their size, have been found to pollute groundwater and air.)
Most family farmers seem to agree on what led to their plight: government policy.

In the years after the New Deal, they set a price floor for farmers, essentially ensuring they received a minimum wage for the crops they produced.

But the government began rolling back this policy in the 1970s, and now the global market largely determines the price they get for their crops.

Big Corporations farms can make do with lower prices for crops by increasing their scale; a few cents per gallon of cow’s milk adds up if you have thousands of cows.

Smaller farmers warn that a country without local farmers can create problems in the food supply chain.
If one company is providing all the milk or cheese to an entire region, what happens when that plant gets contaminated or a storm isolates it from the rest of the country?
“It’s an incredibly fragile supply chain, and when it fails, it fails completely

Concentrating farmland among a few big Corporation is akin to feudalism,
It also diverts whatever profits might come from farming to faraway investors, aggravating the economic and geographic divisions that feed the nation’s political divide.

“There’s a strong reason to be deeply concerned when instead of having 10 mid-sized dairy farms producing income whose owners spend it in town, you replace that with a large Corporation farm owned by a set of investors whose profits go running off to New York
The best solution is government policy that cracks down on consolidation of the grocery stores and food processing facilities that buy food from farmers.

Existing antitrust law would allow the government to prevent big mergers that mean farmers have fewer places to sell their crops and that supplies are more expensive, but those laws go largely unenforced,
A moratorium on large food and grocery mergers.
Advocating for better antitrust enforcement across North America

We must connect and protect family farmers from monopoly power
Corporation have conspired to set low prices on mil, any many other crops. Even Beef, chicken.
One category of small farmers is thriving in the current marketplace: organic farms who can charge a premium for their crops and who can sell them locally.

There were more than 14,000 certified organic farmers in 2016, up 58 percent from 2011.
Unkown what the data is for 2020- 2024 – if you have anyof this data please share

But switching to organic is expensive option.
Small farmers get little assistance and goes to the farms with the most farmland and animals.
They’re not holding their breath that anything will change. “I sometimes feel,”

Nationalism is is a crutch and most do see this was programmed and indoctrinated for years

This removes individual self-sufficient

Lets get closer to home here – Alberta – or even closer our county, we have top down dictatorship

This is nationalism –you been brought into this propagandas right at your local level and individualism was removed

Unintentionally community – is individual man /women having land and they are responsible for their action.
People must learn to resist authority and take control over their lives- without these steps they will always be ruled by others.

No centralized power –

Decentralization of power down to the community, family, and ultimately to the individual to make their informed decision,

Keep the populace in potential crisis, how do we live without the government

It’s about self sufficient and independence we do not need you interfering in our lives

WE can take care of ourselves to a

When we live Closer to the land, grounded –

We have all the technology to create self sufficient homes and

Our own self –sufficiency will save us—

You have control over what you eat, control your future, and for those who have children you have control over your children, you can stop the brainwashing and indoctrination of your children from harm

We hear the phrase over and over you’ll own nothing and be happy

Well here is a plan – be self-sufficient and you’ll own everything –

Survival mind

They can’t create a new system without crashing this system and that is what is happening

Step to this – declare your independence –

Self-sufficiency a threat to the government and the Rulers of the World
1) Self-sufficiency (also called self-containment) is the state of not requiring any aid, support, or interaction, for survival; it is therefore a type of personal or collective autonomy. On a national scale, a totally self-sufficient economy that does not trade with the outside world is called an autarky.
2) The term self-sufficiency is usually applied to varieties of sustainable living in which nothing is consumed outside of what is produced by the self-sufficient individuals. Examples of attempts at self-sufficiency in North America include simple living, homesteading, off-the-grid, survivalism, DIY ethic and the back-to-the-land movement.
3) Practices that enable or aid self-sufficiency include autonomous building, permaculture, sustainable agriculture, and renewable energy. The term is also applied to limited forms of self-sufficiency, for example growing one's own food or becoming economically independent of state subsidies.
Based on those definitions my answer is YES….but…
Government exists for the sake of providing security and sustaining resources for the people living under it.
For it to work properly people must believe in its ability to do it.
Self sufficient can only apply successfully to a “people “and not just one individual. Most deals, trades, and wars seem to come down to accumulating more people, land, resources, and security.
When up against a government, state, city, tribe, or even a rather large family ,an individual's quest for self sufficiency alone is bound to put him in peril.
Humans need each other eventually and no matter what kind of civilization you live with.
Your desire to be self sufficient or a survivalist would have to be one with guidelines that did not affect the lives of those who live close to you and are accustomed to living a different lifestyle.
One can read the history books and documents from ancient people and know that assimilating survivalist mentality with a seditary lifestyle is harder than it sounds.
The threat of individualistic self-sufficiency is only a threat when a larger people lose belief in the idea of Nationality and decide return to hunter/gathering, pastoral, or agricultural living.

Those are the ways the ancients lived initially ….those three ways may be seen as self-sufficient; however they are entirely different ways to survive!

For example Native Americans never believed in the concept of land ownership, the world belongs to all who dwelled upon it, and Europeans just didn't “get it.”

The survivalist mentality is rarely harmonious eventually a new governing body would have make laws , provide defense, and secure resources for the people again.

Show less