STUNNINGLY Stupid Move By Starmer Shows Panic In The Ranks!

Right, so Keir Starmer has been ably demonstrating that he’s really not up to the job of running the country. He’s like that turtle sitting on top of a fencepost analogy, in that you know he didn’t get there by himself, he clearly doesn’t belong there, he doesn’t know what to do whilst he’s up there, he’s been completely elevated far above his ability to function and you’re just left wondering what kind of idiot thought putting him there was a good idea to begin with.
Of course we already know a good deal of who got him where he is today, it required a lot of right wing, pro Zionist influence and money, it required rampant dishonesty about everything he stood for and now he’s been exposed for it, his government’s approval rating sits at just 14% less than 6 months after winning a landslide at the General Election. He’s now been exposed, he thinks it doesn’t matter, but with rumblings of dissent and backroom talk about having to ditch him, lame duck that he is, the fact he has now done something so epically stupid in a bid to reverse his flailing fortunes and the economy he’s overseen the tanking of, shows this is a government that is out of ideas already, that wanted the job and all the press coverage and prestige that came with it, but no idea what to do with it. Perhaps Starmer isn’t the only turtle on a fencepost here.
Right, so stupidity when it comes to politics might as well be Starmer’s middle name, but given that it’s actually Rodney, cue the plonker jokes because right now he’s earning them.
The economy we know has overall flatlined since Labour came to power, actually declining slightly by 0.1%. Rachel Reeves pulled a George Osborne and where small signs of economic growth were beginning to appear, Osbornomics was used to kill it stone dead. If Labour had kept it’s manifesto commitments this would never have happened, but they had to concoct a story about a £22bn financial black hole, which we all knew about because the OBR had detailed it months before the election, yet Reeves is adamant she didn’t and therefore there was the excuse for more austerity to be meted out. Cuts to department spending yet again after 14 years of the Tories leaving such budgets already on their knees, attacks on the disabled, comments coming from all manner of right wing parties saying you can’t all be disabled, but again, after 14 years of the Tories making people sicker, not to mention the lasting effects of the incompetence shown during the pandemic, I don’t doubt those numbers. Inflation is rising again and the government bond ticker for 30 year bonds, the interest the government pays to bondholders on its own borrowing hit a 26 year high, so economically more inept than Liz Truss and that is terrifying. Lack of investment in schools is creating a new generation of people poorer and sicker than their parents, homelessness is rising again and the cherry on the cake was massive national insurance hikes on employers, which will be passed on to employees, costing them wage rises or worse their jobs entirely. It’s a recipe for disaster by a government determined to do nothing different from what came before, but taking us for fools by saying they’re all about change.
Well now Starmer has truly jumped the shark, because in light of all of this, admission of being wrong and reversing course completely out of the question, because he can never admit to being wrong and seemingly giving up on his customer service Chancellor who passes herself off as an economist, he’s decided to ask UK regulators how to trigger some growth.
Growth was supposed to be the number one goal of this government and they haven’t a clue how to do this and you’d think being out of power for 14 years would given them ample time to come up with some growth strategies. Did Ed Miliband not devise any growth strategies? Did Jeremy Corbyn not devise any? Well, I’m damn sure Corbyn did, rebalancing the economy to make the rich pay more having enriched the party with small donations from supporters, meant he could have done that, but Starmer chose the way of Blair, to kiss the backsides of the millionaires and billionaires and tell the membership to get lost, either forcibly on trumped up charges of racism, or by making them leave in utter disgust when he got exposed to them what a right wing liar he was. He can’t do that, he can’t tax the rich, they own him and he put himself in that position taking over Labour at the time he did.
So now, with the same tired old right wing policies that have already failed, failing him and Reeves as well, he’s now asking the regulators for ideas to boost growth.
It is an admission that this Labour Party under Starmer and Reeves have no economic credibility or talent at all. They don’t know what they’re doing, they have no plan B and rightfully they are getting rinsed for it. Starmer’s literal number one pledge was growth, but now he’s exposed for having no idea in reality for how to deliver it and having been in power for such a short time, evidently never did. The man is walking pack of lies and he’s just lied his way to the top with no idea of what to do now he’s got there. Turtle on a fencepost.
Of course the pliant mainstream media are helping him out here. The BBC went with a headline of ‘Starmer asks UK regulators for ideas to boost growth’ which is fairly tame, but doesn’t press the stupidity of the situation when Starmer should never need to resort to such a thing. Sky News, were far more hilarious in their online headline, spouting absolute drivel by saying ‘Starmer throws down gauntlet to watchdogs with growth edict’ Oh shut up you berks. He hasn’t thrown down a gauntlet, he’s going around with a begging bowl desperate for ideas because he hasn’t got any, but rather than do what would clearly be best for the country and resign and let someone else who might have some ideas have a go, because he’s completely spent, not having much in the tank to begin with, he’d rather cling on and do nothing except keep on failing.
That isn’t to say that there aren’t rumours of a leadership challenge coming if Starmer doesn’t reverse gear. The two names circulating at the moment to have a tilt at the top job being Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting. Streeting is one of the most detested Labour politicians of all, but he’s also a bad pick given that locally in his constituency they ran such a strong campaign in the General Election building around an independent candidate in Leanne Mohamad, Streeting’s majority was all but wiped out. He’s dead meat come 2029 and I don’t think anything Labour will do will change that, when this guy is hell bent on privatising the NHS. The other candidate is Angela Rayner, who whilst once was beloved of the left, she’s shown her true colours since, has lost that base and on current projections is set to lose her seat as well in 2029 to Nigel Farage’s next set of con artists in waiting to run the country, especially if Elon Musk succeeds in buying our democracy because again, Starmer, as reliant on the rich as he’s made Labour, failed to back a spending cap on political donations despite the obvious risk posed.
Anyway, let’s get to these regulators, the UK regulators, the likes of OFWAT, Ofgem, the Financial Conduct Authority, the Competition Markets Authority, the Environment Agency, the toothless entities that are never able to go far enough to stop the likes of water authorities and the big energy giants from bleeding us dry, are being asked to find ways to boost growth, because Starmer doesn’t know how.
Last month Rachel Reeves made the claim that financial regulations stifle growth, so as a regulator would they agree or disagree with Reeves here? Do they think their remits are too stifling for those they provide oversight over? The problem is, we’ve been here before. Deregulation, less oversight is never going to a good idea because it will be exploited. It brings with it an elevated financial instability or risk and we know this already because softly softly levels of regulation led to the 2008 global financial crisis. Reeves is arguing that we go back to that, I fancy regulators would suggest much the same, they are government appointed after all, but should they do that, they provide Reeves and Starmer with a scapegoat when things inevitably still go wrong. Deregulation may increase profits, may increase growth, but we know the price of this failing and for the sake of easier option, safer options, it isn’t worth the risk, it can never be worth the risk, but Im expecting this is where we’ll end up heading.
Downing Street has demanded they come back with growth proposals by the middle of January, but I imagine this is what we’ll see.
We can’t afford more economic failure and certainly not on that scale. The CBI are saying the UK is in for the steepest decline in business activity in 4 years beginning in the New Year, such are the ramifications of Starmer’s failure. A government that posited itself on growth is going to immediately throw the country into recession by the look of things.
Economic growth is in and of itself, the wrong goal, because growth can only be finite and can be achieved through exploitation of others and resources a healthy economy is different and is a better way of looking at it, but in the here and now, whether you prefer the phrase health or growth for the economy, it all begins with more money in the pockets of ordinary working class people who go out and spend, who by doing so help businesses flourish, create jobs instead of destroying them as Starmer and Reeves have, but that only comes from taxing us less at the bottom and hitting those at the top who hoard so much of the nations wealth, this 6th richest economy on Earth, the wealth of which hardly any of us see, because it’s in the bank accounts of others, it is they that must be taxed, a wealth tax, to raise the funds to rebalance the economy. That is the only solution at this point, everything has been bled dry, those who actually have the money now must pay, but when they include politicians and political parties amongst their investments, how can that possibly happen without radical change to move us away from bought and paid for in it for themselves politicians the likes of which we see in Labour under Starmer, the Tories obviously and also, in what should be obviously, Reform UK Ltd, Nigel Farage’s private company passing itself off as a political party. I’m a Green, I’m a socialist, my bias is nailed on there. They want a wealth tax, it really is the only way to rebalancing the economy so it works for us again and not for them. Starmer is going to fail harder than ever than ever this year, he might not see of it in power.
This is easily Starmer’s biggest problem domestically, but on foreign affairs he’s faring no better either and I’m not talking about his Zionist loyalties to the state of Israel here either as the US have gone ape over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as US ambassador for the UK, so much so they’ve branded him a moron! Get the details of that story in this video recommendation here as your suggested next watch. Please do also like, share and subscribe to the channel if you haven’t already done so so you don’t miss new daily content, it also supports the channel too which is very much appreciated and I’ll hopefully catch you on the next vid. Cheers folks.